Purpose: The physical properties of proton therapy allow for decreased dose delivery to nontarget structures. The purpose of this study was to determine if this translates into a clinical benefit by comparing acute and chronic morbidity between patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma who are treated with intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and those treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Materials and Methods: Patients receiving IMPT for nasopharyngeal cancer from 2011-13 were matched in a 2:1 IMPT to IMRT ratio. Matching criteria were, in order, T-stage, N-stage, radiation dose, chemotherapy type, World Health Organization classification, sex, and age. Results: Ten patients treated with IMPT and 20 matched patients treated with IMRT were included. By the end of treatment, 2 IMPT-treated patients (20%) and 13 IMRTtreated patients (65%) required gastrostomy tube (GT) insertion (P ¼ .020). Patients receiving IMPT had significantly lower mean doses to the oral cavity, brainstem, whole brain, and mandible. Increased mean dose to the oral cavity was associated with a higher rate of GT placement (P , .001), but mean dose to the brainstem, whole brain, and mandible was not. Partitioning analysis showed that no patient required GT insertion if the mean oral cavity dose was ,26 Gy, but all patients with a mean oral cavity dose. 41.8 Gy required GT insertion. Treatment type (IMPT versus IMRT), induction chemotherapy (yes versus no), mean oral cavity dose, mean brainstem dose, and mean mandible dose were entered into the multivariable model. Only higher mean oral cavity dose remained significantly associated with higher GT rates on multivariable analysis http://theijpt.org
(1) Background: We compared the outcomes of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with IMPT and VMAT. (2) Methods: We performed a retrospective propensity score matching analysis (1:1) of patients treated with IMPT (years: 2016–2018) and VMAT (2014–2018). Survival was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to identify the independent predictors of survival. Binary toxicity endpoint analyses were performed using a Cox model and logistic regression. (3) Results: Eighty patients who received IMPT and VMAT were included. The median follow-up time was 24.1 months in the IMPT group. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not statistically different between the two groups but potentially better in IMPT group. In multivariate analysis, advanced N-stage and body weight loss (BWL; >7%) during radiotherapy were associated with decreased PFS. The IMPT group had significantly less requirement for nasogastric (NG) tube placement and BWL during treatment. The mean oral cavity dose was the only predictive factor in stepwise regression analysis, and IMPT required a significantly lower mean dose. However, IMPT increased the grade 3 radiation dermatitis. (4) Conclusions: IMPT is associated with reduced rates of NG tube insertion and BWL through reducing oral mean dose, potentially producing better oncologic outcomes.
The physiological function of the Mu rhythm (8–13 Hz in the central region) is still unclear, particularly its role in visuomotor performance in sports (shooting vs. golf putting), as both the complexity of the motor skills (i.e., simple vs. complex visuomotor skills) and the skill level (e.g., novices vs. experts or low-skilled vs. highly skilled) may modulate Mu rhythm. To gain a broader understanding of the association between Mu rhythm and visuomotor skill performance, a study design that considers both a control moderator (the difference in skill level) and the ability to manipulate Mu rhythm (i.e., either increase or decrease Mu rhythm) is required. To achieve this, we recruited 30 novice golfers who were randomly assigned to either the increased Mu rhythm group (IMG), decreased Mu rhythm group (DMG), or sham group (SG) and used electroencephalographic-neurofeedback training (EEG-NFT) to manipulate Mu rhythm during a golf putting task (complex visuomotor skill). The aim was to determine whether the complexity of the motor skill was a potential moderator of Mu rhythm. We mainly found that Mu power was significantly decreased in the DMG following EEG-NFT, which lead to increased motor control and improved performance. We suggest that (1) the complexity of the motor skill, rather than the difference in skill level, may be a potential moderator of Mu rhythm and visuomotor performance, as our results were not consistent with a previous study that reported that increased Mu rhythm improved shooting performance (a simple visuomotor task) in novices.
Aim: Psychiatric disorders are easily underestimated and under-recognized by physicians. The aim of the present study was to investigate the change in accuracy of recognizing psychiatric symptoms.
Methods:Consecutive 5-year consultation-liaison data were collected and patients with one of the five common psychiatric diagnoses, including depressive disorders, substance use disorders, delirium, anxiety disorders and psychotic disorders, were chosen for analysis. The primary care physician's initial impression of a psychiatric diagnosis was recorded based on their reason for referral on the referral sheets. Accurate recognition was defined as matching of the physician's initial impression with the psychiatrist's final diagnosis. Mentioning the core symptoms of psychiatric diagnostic criteria or common synonyms would be considered as correct recognition.
Results:The overall accuracy of recognition was 41.5% and there was no significant change during this 5-year period. Substance use disorders were the one diagnosis with the highest agreement, followed by delirium, depressive disorders, anxiety disorders, and psychotic disorders. As for the factors associated with accurate recognition, male patients or those with multiple physical illnesses were more likely to have their psychiatric symptoms recognized correctly.Conclusions: Without comprehensive postgraduate psychiatric education, the accuracy of recognizing psychiatric symptoms does not improve year by year. Education should focus on common psychiatric problems among medical inpatients, especially those easily misdiagnosed, such as depression and delirium.
Background In this study, we aimed to investigate the impact of surgical procedures on the body image of head and neck cancer patients treated with radiotherapy and with or without radical surgery.MethodsA cross-sectional survey of 150 patients with head and neck cancer was conducted. Sixty patients had nasopharyngeal cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy without surgery, and 90 patients had oral cavity cancer treated with radical surgery plus adjuvant radiotherapy. All participants completed a 10-item Body Image Scale (BIS) questionnaire to assess body image dissatisfaction. Among all patients, the socio-demographic and clinical variables were age, gender, partnership, education, employment, and radical surgery. In surgically-treated patients, the clinical variables were facial skin sacrificed, mouth angle sacrificed, glossectomy, maxillectomy, and mandibulectomy. ANOVAs, t-tests, and multiple regressions were used to evaluate the relationships between these variables and BIS results.ResultsIn all patients, radical surgery was the strongest independent predictor of BIS scores. Surgically-treated patients had significantly worse BIS scores than the patients without surgery. In surgically-treated patients, facial skin sacrificed, mouth angle sacrificed, maxillectomy, and mandibulectomy were significantly associated with body image. According to multivariable analyses, inferior maxillectomy and segmental mandibulectomy were independent prognosticators of a poor BIS score in surgically-treated patients.ConclusionRadical surgery for head and neck cancer patients has a significant impact on their body image, especially for those undergoing facial bone destructive surgery.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.