No abstract

Background: The main etiologies of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were often hepatitis B virus (HBV) or C and alcohol, rarely autoimmune and biliary diseases. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has been an emerging role that could lead to chronic liver disease, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, cirrhosis, and eventually HCC in recent years. The aim of our study is to investigate and compare the clinical features of HCC in patients with NAFLD and HBV, including age, gender, cirrhosis, liver function tests, largest tumor size, and cancer stage at the time of diagnosis. The survival outcome was compared between the two groups and the significant predictors of mortality were also analyzed in all patients with HCC. Methods: Most patients with HCC were recruited from the database of Cancer Registries in Taipei City Hospital, Ren-Ai Branch, from 2011 to 2017; and the other patients consecutively from the HCC multidisciplinary conference between January 2018 and December 2019. NAFLD was defined as nonviral hepatitis B (negative HBsAg and either positive anti-HBs or negative anti-HBc), nonviral hepatitis C (negative antihepatitis C virus [HCV]), nonalcoholic (alcohol consumption of <30 g/d for men and <20 g/d for women) liver disease, or present or past histological or ultrasonographic evidence of fatty liver. Totally, 23 NAFLD-related and 156 HBV-related HCC patients were enrolled in our study for further analysis. Results: NAFLD-related HCC patients were significantly older (median age: 70.0 [61.0–79.0] years vs. 63.0 [56.0–72.0] years, p = 0.012) and heavier (median body mass index [BMI]: 26.6 [24.2–30] kg/m2 vs. 24.8 [22.0–27.1] kg/m2, p = 0.044) than those with HBV-related HCC. They were also more susceptible to diabetes mellitus (DM), and 60.9% (14 of 23) of them had this comorbidity compared with 29.5% (46 of 156) of those with HBV-related HCC (p = 0.003). Only 34.8% (8 of 23) and 71.2% (111 of 156) of patients with NAFLD- and HBV-related HCC were cirrhotic, respectively (p = 0.001). However, gender, tobacco use, international normalized ratio, albumin, creatinine, and cholesterol levels were not significantly different between the two groups. Tumor characteristics such as the Barcelona clinic liver cancer stage, largest tumor size, tumor number, extrahepatic metastasis, and treatment modalities had no significant difference between such groups. According to the Kaplan–Meier method analysis, the overall survival was not significantly different between these two patient groups (log-rank test, p = 0.101). To evaluate which patient group would lead to poor prognosis, we analyzed the survival of all patients through multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression after controlling other factors that may influence the hazard ratio. The analysis revealed that NAFLD and HBV infection as the cause of HCC are not risk factors of poor prognosis. Conclusion: In conclusion, our study showed NAFLD-related HCC patients were older, heavier, and more had DM than HBV-related. In addition, more NAFLD-related HCC patients were noncirrhotic than HBV-related. The survival rate was similar between NAFLD and HBV-related HCC patients.

Our findings suggest that the severity of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related liver injury is associated with patient age at biopsy. Both serum iron indices and hepatic iron deposition show correlation with serum indices of chronic liver disease but are not related to grade and stage of liver histology.

The aim of this analysis is to describe the baseline characteristics of patients who are prescribed teriparatide for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in a real-world setting in East Asia. Patients and Methods: The Asia and Latin America Fracture Observational Study (ALAFOS) is a prospective, multinational, observational study designed to evaluate realworld use of teriparatide in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in 20 countries across Asia, Latin America, the Middle East, and Russia. This subregional analysis focuses on the East Asian subpopulation of the ALAFOS study. Here we report baseline clinical characteristics, details regarding the history of fractures, risk factors for osteoporosis, comorbidities, osteoporosis treatment, and health-related quality of life in patients enrolled in China, Hong Kong, South Korea, and Taiwan. Results: The East Asian subgroup of ALAFOS included 1136 postmenopausal women, constituting 37.5% (1136/3031) of the overall ALAFOS patient population. The mean (SD) age was 75.0 (9.6) years. The mean (SD) bone mineral density T-scores were −3.11 (1.54), −2.58 (1.11), and −2.86 (1.09) at the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck, respectively; 69.6% of patients had experienced at least one fragility fracture and 40.4% had experienced ≥2 fragility fractures after 40 years of age. Overall, 63.3% of patients had used medications for osteoporosis in the past. The mean (SD) EQ-5D-5LVisual Analog Scale (VAS) score at baseline was 59.7 (20.8); the mean (SD) back pain numeric rating scale score for worst pain in the last 24 hrs was 5.2 (3.2). Conclusion:Our results indicate that patients who are prescribed teriparatide in East Asia were elderly women with severe osteoporosis, low bone mineral density, high prevalence of fractures, back pain and poor health-related quality of life. Most of the patients received teriparatide as a second-line treatment.