p57KIP2 is a potent tight-binding inhibitor of several G1 cyclin/Cdk complexes, and is a negative regulator of cell proliferation. The gene encoding p57KIP2 is located at 11p15.5 (ref. 2), a region implicated in both sporadic cancers and Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome, a cancer-predisposing syndrome, making it a tumour-suppressor candidate. Several types of childhood tumours including Wilms' tumour, adrenocortical carcinoma and rhabdomyosarcoma exhibit a specific loss of maternal 11p15 alleles, suggesting that genomic imprinting is involved. Genetic analysis of the Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome indicated maternal carriers, as well as suggesting a role of genomic imprinting. Previously, we and others demonstrated that p57KIP2 is imprinted and that only the maternal allele is expressed in both mice and humans. Here we describe p57KIP2 mutations in patients with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. Among nine patients we examined, two were heterozygous for different mutations in this gene-a missense mutation in the Cdk inhibitory domain resulting in loss of most of the protein, and a frameshift resulting in disruption of the QT domain. The missense mutation was transmitted from the patient's carrier mother, indicating that the expressed maternal allele was mutant and that the repressed paternal allele was normal. Consequently, little or no active p57KIP2 should exist and this probably causes the overgrowth in this BWS patient.
The human UBE3A gene shows brain-specific partial imprinting, and lack of a maternally inherited allele causes Angelman syndrome (AS), which is characterized by neurobehavioral anomalies. In several AS model mice, imprinted Ube3a expression is detected predominantly in the hippocampus, cerebellar Purkinje cells and the olfactory bulb. Therefore, imprinting of mouse Ube3a is thought to be region-specific with different levels of silencing of the paternal Ube3a allele in different brain regions. To determine cell types of imprinted Ube3a expression, we analyzed its imprinting status in embryonic brain cells by using primary cortical cell cultures. RT-PCR and immunofluorescence were performed to determine the allelic expression of the gene. The Ube3a gene encodes two RNA transcripts in the brain, sense and antisense. The sense transcript was expressed maternally in neurons but biallelically in glial cells in the embryonic brain, whereas the antisense transcript was expressed only in neurons and only from the paternal allele. Our data present evidence of brain cell type-specific imprinting, i.e. neuron-specific imprinting of Ube3a in primary brain cell cultures. Reciprocal imprinting of sense and antisense transcripts present only in neurons suggests that the neuron-specific imprinting mechanism is related to the lineage determination of neural stem cells.
Approximately half of all human genes have CpG islands (CGIs)around their promoter regions. Although CGIs usually escape methylation, those on Chromosome X in females and those in the vicinity of imprinted genes are exceptions: They have both methylated and unmethylated alleles to display a “composite” pattern in methylation analysis. In addition, aberrant methylation of CGIs is known to often occur in cancer cells. Here we developed a simple HpaII-McrBC PCR method for discrimination of full, null, incomplete, and composite methylation patterns, and applied it to all computationally identified CGIs on human Chromosome 21q. This comprehensive analysis revealed that, although most CGIs (103 out of 149)escape methylation, a sizable fraction (31 out of 149)are fully methylated even in normal peripheral blood cells. Furthermore, we identified seven CGIs showing the composite methylation, and demonstrated that three of them are indeed methylated monoallelically. Further analyses using informative pedigrees revealed that two of the three are subject to maternal allele-specific methylation. Intriguingly, the other CGI is methylated in an allele-specific but parental-origin-independent manner. Thus, the cell seems to have a broader repertoire of methylating CGIs than previously thought, and our approach may contribute to uncover novel modes of allelic methylation
p57KIP2 is a potent tight-binding inhibitor of several G1 cyclin/Cdk complexes, and is a negative regulator of cell proliferation. The gene encoding human p57KIP is located on chromosome 11p15.5 (ref. 2), a region implicated in both sporadic cancers and Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome, a familial cancer syndrome, marking it a tumour suppressor candidate. Several types of childhood tumours including Wilm's tumour, adrenocortical carcinoma and rhabdomyosarcoma display a specific loss of maternal 11p15 alleles, suggesting that genomic imprinting plays an important part. Genetic analysis of the Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome has indicated maternal carriers as well as suggested a role in genomic imprinting. Here, as a first step towards elucidating the genesis of human cancers in this region, we showed that a mouse homologue of p57KIP2 is genomically imprinted. The paternally inherited allele is transcriptionally repressed and methylated. This murine gene maps to the distal region of chromosome 7, within a cluster of imprinted genes, including insulin-2, insulin-like growth factor-2, H19 and Mash2 (refs 14-18).
9Biomolecular Engineering Research Institute (BERI), Japan O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) repairs the cytotoxic and mutagenic O6-alkylguanine produced by alkylating agents such as chemotherapeutic agents and mutagens. Recent studies have shown that in a subset of tumors, MGMT expression is inversely linked to hypermethylation of the CpG island in the promoter region; however, how the epigenetic silencing mechanism works, as it relates to hypermethylation, was still unclear. To understand the mechanism, we examined the detailed methylation status of the whole island with bisulfitesequencing in 19 MGMT non-expressed cancer cell lines. We found two highly methylated regions in the island. One was upstream of exon 1, including minimal promoter, and the other was downstream, including enhancer. Reporter gene assay showed that methylation of both the upstream and downstream regions suppressed luciferase activity drastically. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assay revealed that histone H3 lysine 9 was hypermethylated throughout the island in the MGMT negative line, whereas acetylation on H3 and H4 and methylation on H3 lysine 4 were at significantly high levels outside the minimal promoter in the MGMT-expressed line. Furthermore, MeCP2 preferentially bound to the CpG-methylated island in the MGMT negative line. Given these results, we propose a model for gene silencing of MGMT that is dependent on the epigenetic state in cancer.
We have developed a powerful genomic scanning method, termed "restriction landmark genomic scanning," that is useful for analysis of the genomic DNA of higher organisms using restriction sites as landmarks. Genomic DNA is radioactively labeled at cleavage sites specific for a rare cleaving restriction enzyme and then size-fractionated in one dimension. The fractionated DNA is further digested with another more frequently occurring enzyme and separated in the second dimension. This procedure gives a two-dimensional pattern with thousands of scattered spots corresponding to sites for the rust enzyme, indicating that the genome of mammals can be scanned at =1-megabase intervals. The position and intensity of a spot reflect its locus and the copy number of the corresponding restriction site, respectively, based on the nature of the end-labeling system. Therefore, this method is widely applicable to genome mapping or detection of alterations in a genome.Genomic DNA analysis is essential for clarifying the characteristics of mammalian DNA. However, the genomes of these organisms are very large. For example, the mammalian genome is about 3 x 109 base pairs (bp), which is 1000 times that of Escherichia coli. The first step in analyzing large genomes requires the scanning of many landmarks. Southern blotting has been used for this purpose (1); however, usually only one locus on the genome can be detected with a single probe. Therefore, when this method is applied to scanning a genome, it must be repeated many times with many probes. Several Southern blot repetitions might be theoretically sufficient for some purposes, if a repetitive sequence is used as a probe (2, 3). However, bands (spots) corresponding to loci cannot be separated in these systems.In this paper, we introduce a concept termed "restriction landmark," in which each restriction enzyme recognition site can be used as a landmark. Based on this concept, we developed a restriction landmark genomic scanning (RLGS) method, which employs (i) direct end labeling of the genomic DNA digested with a restriction enzyme and (ii) highresolution, two-dimensional electrophoresis. Using this method, we simultaneously separated and detected thousands of signals (spots) derived from restriction sites. Thus, we could locate landmarks on mammalian genomes at intervals averaging -1 megabase pair (Mbp). MATERIALS AND METHODSDNA Preparation. Genomic DNA was extracted from each sample as described (4). 1 Ci = 37 GBq) for 30 min at 370C in 100 Al of 50 mM Tris HCI (pH 7.4), 100 mM NaCI, 10 mM dithiothreitol, 0.16 ,uM dXTP[aS], and 33 tM ddYTP [aS]. To inactivate the enzyme, this reaction mixture was incubated at 650C for 1 hr. When the average size of the DNA fragments was more than several hundred kilobase pairs, an additional digestion was performed using restriction enzyme B. (iv) One microgram ofthe DNA from step iii was fractionated on a 50 x 20 x 0.1 cm agarose gel (0.8-1% Seakem GTG agarose; FMC) and then electrophoresed in 1x TAM buffer (50 mM Tris-acetate, pH 7....
We have developed a new genome scanning method (restriction landmark genomic scanning (RLGS), based on the new concept of using restriction enzyme sites as landmarks. RLGS employs direct end labeling of the genomic DNA digested with a restriction enzyme and two-dimensional electrophoresis with high-resolution. Its advantages are: (i) high-speed scanning ability, allowing simultaneous scanning of thousands of restriction landmarks; (ii) extension of the scanning field using different kinds of landmarks in an additional series of electrophoresis; (iii) application to any type of organism because of direct-labeling of restriction enzyme sites and no hybridization procedure; and (iv) reflection of the copy number of the restriction landmark by the spot intensity which enables distinction of haploid and diploid genomic DNAs. The RLGS method has various applications because it can be used to scan for physical genomic DNA states, such as amplification, deletion and methylation. The copy number of the locus of a restriction landmark can be estimated by the spot intensity to find either an amplified or deleted region. The methylation state of genomic DNA can also be discovered by use of a methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme sites as a restriction landmark (restriction landmark genomic scanning for screening methylated sites, RLGS-M). This article introduces the basic principle of RLGS and its applications to the analysis of cancer, mouse mutant DNAs and tissue-specific methylation, showing the usefulness of RLGS for a variety of biological fields.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.