Background Hospital settings are at increased risk of spreading Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections, hence non-pharmaceutical prevention interventions (NPPIs) and prioritized vaccination of healthcare workers and resident patients are critical. The status of COVID-19 hospital acquired infections (HAIs) in low-income settings is unclear. We aimed to identify and summarize the existing evidence on COVID-19 HAIs amongst patients, prior to the rollout of vaccines in countries worldwide. Methods We conducted a scoping review of English peer-reviewed literature in PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus using a combination of selected search terms. Full texts articles presenting results on COVID-19 HAIs in hospitalised patients before the rollout of vaccines in countries worldwide were eligible. Data extracted from eligible articles included estimates of COVID-19 HAIs, country, and type of hospital setting, and was summarized narratively. Quality assessment of included articles was not possible. Results Literature searches generated a total of 5920 articles, and 45 were eligible for analysis. Eligible articles were from Europe, North America, Asia, and Brazil and none were from low-income countries. The proportion of COVID-19 HAIs ranged from 0% when strict NPPIs were applied, to 65% otherwise. The estimates of COVID-19 HAIs did not differ by country but were lower in studies conducted after implementation of NPPIs and in specialized hospital settings for operative surgery. Studies conducted before the implementation of NPPIs or in long-term care and psychiatric wards often reported high estimates of HAI. Although there was no clear trend in general wards, those situated in academic hospitals managed to reduce HAI rates under strict NPPI protocols. Operative surgery settings, unlike psychiatric settings, effectively prevented COVID-19 HAI using tailored NPPIs. Conclusion The available evidence shows a high risk of COVID-19 HAIs, the feasibility of preventing HAIs in different healthcare settings and the importance of appropriately tailored NPPIs. There were no data from low-income settings, therefore, it is unclear whether the reported NPPI approaches could be equally effective elsewhere. We recommend routine monitoring of COVID-19 HAIs in countries with low vaccination coverage, to identify and close gaps in NPPIs and understand gains made from vaccinating healthcare workers and hospitalized patients.

IntroductionResearch has shown an association between increased disclosure of HIV status by pregnant and breastfeeding women and improved clinical health and that of their infant. Increasing awareness about their male partner’s HIV status will no doubt lead to even better outcomes at the population level. Male partner involvement is important for improving outcomes of prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV (MTCT) as it improves social support and commitment from both parents of the baby to ensure sustained good health. Although lack of knowledge of the HIV status of a male partner is of great concern, limited research has been done to determine whether it remains one of the barriers to reaching the proposed goals of eliminating MTCT in pregnant or postpartum women. Our aim is to determine if lack of knowledge of a male partner’s HIV status is a significant risk factor for HIV incidence and poor HIV clinical outcomes among pregnant women and postpartum women and their infants.Methods and analysisA systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental and observational studies will be conducted. The review will focus on knowledge of male partner’s HIV status in the 21 priority countries most affected by HIV in Africa. We will search electronic databases such as PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane library, Science Direct, CINAHL, LILACS and SciELO databases from January 2011 to December 2021. We will also search the Pan African and WHO clinical trial registries and conference archives. We will conduct a quality assessment of eligible studies and evaluate the heterogeneity of the pooled studies using the I2 statistic. The statistical analysis will be performed using STATA statistical software V.16.Ethics and disseminationThe study will use publicly available data and ethics exemption has been obtained from Human Research Ethics Committees, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University. The protocol was registered on Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, registration number CRD42021247686, in May 2021. Findings of this systematic review will be disseminated in peer-review journals including various media platforms, that is, webinars, symposia, conferences or congresses.PROSPERO registration numberRegistration number CRD42021247686.