Secukinumab was effective for psoriasis in two randomized trials, validating interleukin-17A as a therapeutic target. (Funded by Novartis Pharmaceuticals; ERASURE and FIXTURE ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT01365455 and NCT01358578, respectively.).
Secukinumab is superior to ustekinumab in clearing skin of subjects with moderate to severe psoriasis and improving health-related quality of life with a comparable safety profile over 16 weeks.
Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) are associated with invasion, angiogenesis, and poor prognosis in many human cancers. However, the role of TAMs in human basal cell carcinoma (BCC) remains elusive. We found that the number of TAMs infiltrating the tumor is correlated with the depth of invasion, microvessel density, and COX-2 expression in human BCC cells. TAMs also aggregate near COX-2 expressing BCC tumor nests. We hypothesize that TAMs might activate COX-2 in BCC cells and subsequently increase their invasion and angiogenesis. TAMs are a kind of M2 macrophage derived from macrophages exposed to Th2 cytokines. M2-polarized macrophages derived from peripheral blood monocytes were cocultured with BCC cells without direct contact. Coculture with the M2 macrophages induced COX-2-dependent invasion and angiogenesis of BCC cells. Human THP-1 cell line cells, after treated with phorbol myristate acetate (PMA), differentiated to macrophages with M2 functional profiles. Coculture with PMA-treated THP-1 macrophages induced COX-2-dependent release of matrix metalloproteinase-9 and subsequent increased invasion of BCC cells. Macrophages also induced COX-2-dependent secretion of basic fibroblast growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor-A, and increased angiogenesis in BCC cells.
Summary
Background
Guselkumab, an anti‐interleukin‐23 monoclonal antibody, has demonstrated significant efficacy in phase III psoriasis trials.
Objectives
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of guselkumab in patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis who had an inadequate response to ustekinumab.
Methods
In this phase III, randomized, double‐blind study, 871 patients received open‐label ustekinumab (45 mg or 90 mg) at weeks 0 and 4. At week 16, 268 patients with an inadequate response to ustekinumab [Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) ≥ 2] were randomized (double‐blind) to guselkumab 100 mg or to continue ustekinumab; 585 of 871 patients (67%) with IGA 0/1 at week 16 continued open‐label ustekinumab. The primary end point was the number of visits at which randomized patients achieved IGA 0/1 and at least a two‐grade improvement (from week 16) from week 28 to week 40. Improvement ≥ 90% or 100% in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90/100) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) of 0/1 were also assessed.
Results
The mean number of visits at which patients achieved IGA 0/1 and at least a two‐grade improvemen (week 28–40) was significantly greater in the guselkumab group vs. the randomized ustekinumab group (1·5 vs. 0·7; P < 0·001); greater proportions of patients in the guselkumab group achieved IGA 0/1 and at least a two‐grade improvement at week 28 (31·1% vs. 14·3%; P = 0·001) and week 52 (36·3% vs. 17·3%; P < 0·001). Greater proportions of patients treated with guselkumab achieved PASI 90, PASI 100 and DLQI 0/1 at week 52. After week 16, 64·4% of patients in the guselkumab group and 55·6% in the ustekinumab group had at least one adverse event (AE); infections were the most frequent AE type. Overall, 6·7% (n = 9) of patients in the guselkumab group had at least one serious AE compared with 4·5% (n = 6) for the ustekinumab group.
Conclusions
Patients treated with ustekinumab who did not achieve an IGA of 0/1 by week 16 derived significant benefit from switching to guselkumab.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.