The aim of the study was to characterize a variety of
microstructure development-levels and geotechnical property sequences of the late
Pleistocene–Holocene deposits in the Mekong River delta (MRD), and the paper
furthermore discusses the influences of delta formation mechanisms on them. The
survey associated the geotechnical engineering and the sedimentary geology of the
late Pleistocene–Holocene deposits at five sites and also undifferentiated
Pleistocene sediments. A cross-section which was rebuilt in the delta
progradation-direction and between the Mekong and Bassac rivers represents the
stratigraphy. Each sedimentary unit was formed under a different delta formation
mechanism and revealed a typical geotechnical property sequence. The mechanical
behaviors of the sediment succession in the tide-dominated delta with significant
fluvial-activity and material source tend to be more cohesionless soils and strengths
than those in the tide- and wave-dominated delta and even the coast. The particular
tendency of the mechanical behavior of the deposit succession can be reasonably
estimated from the delta formation mechanism. The characteristics of the clay
minerals from the Mekong River produced the argillaceous soil which does not have
extremely high plasticity. The microstructure development-levels are low to very high
indicating how to choose hydraulic conductivity value, k, for estimating
overconsolidation ratio, OCR, by the piezocone penetration tests (CPTU). The OCR of
sediments in the delta types strangely change with depth but none less than 1. The
post-depositional processes significantly influenced the microstructure development,
particularly the dehydrating and oxidizing processes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.