Insulin-and glyburide-stimulated changes in cytosolic free calcium concentrations (QCa2+Ii) were studied in gluteal adipocytes obtained from six obese women (139±3% ideal body wt) and six healthy, normal weight age-and sex-matched controls. Biopsies were performed after an overnight fast and twice (at 3 and 6 h) during an insulin infusion (40 mU/m2 per min) (euglycemic clamp). In adipocytes obtained from normal subjects before insulin infusion, insulin (10 ng/ml) increased [Ca2+ji from 146±26 nM to 391±66 nM. Similar increases were evoked by 2 tiM glyburide (329±41 nM). After 3 h of insulin infusion, basal ICa2+ii rose to 234±21 nM, but the responses to insulin and glyburide were completely abolished. In vitro insulin-stimulated 2-deoxyglucose uptake was reduced by insulin and glucose infusion (25% stimulation before infusion, 5.4% at 3 h, and 0.85% at 6 h of infusion). Rat adipocytes were preincubated with 1-10 mM glucose and 10 ng/ml insulin for 24 h. Measurements of 2-deoxyglucose uptake demonstrated insulin resistance in these cells.Under these experimental conditions, increased levels of [Ca2+Ii that were no longer responsive to insulin were demonstrated. Verapamil in the preincubation medium prevented the development of insulin resistance.
The effects of macronutrient composition on fasting and postprandial activities of adipose tissue lipoprotein lipase (ATLPL) and skeletal muscle LPL (SMLPL) and on insulin sensitivity (S(I)) were studied in 25 normal-weight subjects. Each subject was fed a high-carbohydrate (HC) diet for 16 d and a high-fat (HF) diet for 16 d, in randomized order. On day 15 of each diet, biopsies for ATLPL and SMLPL were done in the fasted state and 6 h postprandially. On day 16 of each diet, a euglycemic clamp was used to measure S(I). There was no effect of diet composition on fasting ATLPL or SMLPL. With both diets and in both tissues, LPL increased significantly from fasting to 6 h postprandially. In adipose tissue only there was a significant difference between the 2 diets in LPL meal response (HC >HF, P = 0.024). There was no effect of diet composition on S(I). After the HC diet only, there were significant correlations between fasting SMLPL and S(I), but not ATLPL. After the HF diet, associations between insulin action and LPL were evident only in the postprandial state. In summary, 16 d of HC compared with HF feeding in normal-weight subjects increased the responsiveness of ATLPL to an HC compared with an HF meal. However, the same diets had no effect on fasting ATLPL or SMLPL, the responsiveness of SMLPL to a meal, or S(I). These data suggest that in normal-weight subjects habitual dietary carbohydrate intake may have a stronger effect on subcutaneous fat storage than does dietary fat intake.
Ten moderately obese women (body mass index 34.9 +/- 1.1 kg/m2, mean +/- SEM), had previously been through a 3-month weight loss program followed by 3 months of weight maintenance at the reduced weight. A euglycemic clamp for determination of insulin sensitivity was performed on each subject prior to weight loss, and another at the end of the weight maintenance phase. The mean weight loss for the group was 11.4 +/- 2.2 kg. The women were then seen for follow-up weights 12 months and 18 months after the conclusion of the weight maintenance period. All of the women except one had regained their weight by the time of the 12-month visit. It was found that the amount of weight regained both at 12 months and 18 months was correlated with the change in insulin sensitivity which occurred from the baseline study to after weight loss/maintenance. The data indicate that increased insulin sensitivity following sustained weight loss in obese women predicts weight regain.
Because increases in adipose tissue lipoprotein lipase (ATLPL) may be important in the pathogenesis of obesity, the response of ATLPL to insulin during maintenance of euglycemia was examined in 22 obese and 8 normal weight subjects. Basal levels of ATLPL per g fat tissue for the obese and control groups were 18.7 +/- 2.0 (+/- SEM) and 9.6 +/- 2.7 neq/g X min, respectively. Insulin and glucose infusion rapidly produced antilipolysis in both groups, as evidenced by large falls in FFA by 20 min. When the responses of ATLPL in absolute change from basal were compared between the obese and control groups, no significant differences were found. However, because of the higher baseline ATLPL values in the obese subjects, the percent change in ATLPL from basal was significantly blunted at the 80 (P = 0.02), 180 (P less than 0.05), and 360 (P = 0.005) min timepoints compared to those in the normal subjects. By 3 h into the infusion, the control group had a significant rise in ATLPL above the basal level (4.2 +/- 1.3 ngq/g X min; P = 0.01), whereas the obese group did not (2.3 +/- 1.9 neq/g X min; P = NS). However, by 6 h, the ATLPL per g response above baseline was significantly increased in both normal (19.2 +/- 6.5 neq/g X min; P = 0.01) and obese subjects (9.8 +/- 2.3; P less than 0.001). Because adipose cell size was greater in obese subjects, data were also expressed per 10(6) cells. Basal ATLPL per 10(6) cells [11.8 +/- 1.7 neq/10(6) cells X min (obese); 3.4 +/- 0.9 neq/10(6) cells X min (normal)] was a function of cell size (rs = 0.713; P less than 0.001), body mass index (rs = 0.565; P less than 0.005), and basal insulin levels (rs = 0.434; P less than 0.05). As with the ATLPL per g response, the increases in ATLPL per 10(6) cells above basal were significant at both the 3 and 6 h marks for the normal subjects, but only at the 6 h timepoint for the obese group. Both steady state insulin levels [342 +/- 24 microU/ml (obese); 251 +/- 27 microU/ml (normal)] and the glucose infusion rates needed to maintain euglycemia [319 +/- 23 mg/m2 X min (obese); 312 +/- 33 mg/m2 X min (normal)] did not correlate with changes in ATLPL. Thus, insulin responsiveness of ATLPL in obese subjects was delayed but preserved. This phenomenon may be important in maintenance of the obese state.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.