Frequency-domain analyses of R-R intervals are used widely to estimate levels of autonomic neural traffic to the human heart. Because respiration modulates autonomic activity, we determined for nine healthy subjects the influence of breathing frequency and tidal volume on R-R interval power spectra (fast-Fourier transform method). We also surveyed published literature to determine current practices in this burgeoning field of scientific inquiry. Supine subjects breathed at rates of 6, 7.5, 10, 15, 17.1, 20, and 24 breaths/min and with nominal tidal volumes of 1,000 and 1,500 ml. R-R interval power at respiratory and low (0.06-0.14 Hz) frequencies declined significantly as breathing frequency increased. R-R interval power at respiratory frequencies was significantly greater at a tidal volume of 1,500 than 1,000 ml. Neither breathing frequency nor tidal volume influenced average R-R intervals significantly. Our review of studies reporting human R-R interval power spectra showed that 51% of the studies controlled respiratory rate, 11% controlled tidal volume, and 11% controlled both respiratory rate and tidal volume. The major implications of our analyses are that breathing parameters strongly influence low-frequency as well as respiratory frequency R-R interval power spectra and that this influence is largely ignored in published research.

Postflight orthostatic intolerance is experienced by virtually all astronauts but differs greatly in degree of severity. We studied cardiovascular responses to upright posture in 40 astronauts before and after spaceflights lasting up to 16 days. We separated individuals according to their ability to remain standing without assistance for 10 min on landing day. Astronauts who could not remain standing on landing day had significantly smaller increases in plasma norepinephrine levels with standing than did those who could remain standing (105 +/- 41 vs. 340 +/- 62 pg/ml; P = 0.05). In addition, they had significantly lower standing peripheral vascular resistance (23 +/- 3 vs. 34 +/- 3 mmHg.1l-1).min; P = 0.02) and greater decreases in systolic (-28 +/- 4 vs. -11 +/- 3 mmHg; P = 0.002) and diastolic (-14 +/- 7 vs. 3 +/- 2 mmHg; P = 0.0003) pressures. The presyncopal group also had significantly lower supine (16 +/- 1 vs. 21 +/- 2 mmHg.1l-1).min; P = 0.04) and standing (23 +/- 2 vs. 32 +/- 2 mmHg.1l-1).min; P = 0.038) vascular resistance, supine (66 +/- 2 vs. 73 +/- 2 mmHg; P = 0.008) and standing (69 +/- 4 vs. 77 +/- 2 mmHg; P = 0.007) diastolic pressure, and supine (109 +/- 3 vs. 114 +/- 2 mmHg; P = 0.05) and standing (99 +/- 4 vs. 108 +/- 3 mmHg; P = 0.006) systolic pressures before flight. This is the first study to clearly document these differences among presyncopal and nonpresyncopal astronauts after spaceflight and also offer the possibility of preflight prediction of postflight susceptibility. These results clearly point to hypoadrenergic responsiveness, possibly centrally mediated, as a contributing factor in postflight orthostatic intolerance. They may provide insights into autonomic dysfunction in Earthbound patients.

1. The notion that small, 'non-hypotensive' reductions of effective blood volume alter neither arterial pressure nor arterial baroreceptor activity is pervasive in the experimental literature. We tested two hypotheses: (a) that minute arterial pressure and cardiac autonomic outflow changes during hypovolaemia induced by lower body suction in humans are masked by alterations in breathing, and (b) that evidence for arterial baroreflex engagement might be obtained from measurements of thoracic aorta dimensions. 2. In two studies, responses to graded lower body suction at 0 (control), 5, 10, 15, 20 and 40 mmHg were examined in twelve and ten healthy young men, respectively. In the first, arterial pressure (photoplethysmograph), R-R interval, and respiratory sinus arrhythmia amplitude (complex demodulation) were measured during uncontrolled and controlled breathing (constant breathing frequency and tidal volume). In the second, cross-sectional areas of the ascending thoracic aorta were calculated from nuclear magnetic resonance images. 3. Lower body suction with controlled breathing resulted in an increased arterial pulse pressure at mild levels (5-20 mmHg; ANOVA, P < 0 05) and a decreased arterial pulse pressure at moderate levels (40 mmHg; ANOVA, P < 0 05). Both R-R intervals and respiratory sinus arrhythmia were negatively related to lower body suction level, whether group averages (general linear regression, r > 0 92) or individual subjects (orthogonal polynomials, 12 of 12 subjects) were assessed. 4. Aortic pulse area decreased progressively and significantly during mild lower body suction, with 47 % of the total decline occurring by 5 mmHg. 5. These results suggest that small reductions of effective blood volume reduce aortic baroreceptive areas and trigger haemodynamic adjustments which are so efficient that alterations in arterial pressure escape detection by conventional means.