The Cambridge-based International English Language Testing System (IELTS) test is commonly used as one of the criteria in granting students admission to South African universities. It is therefore expected that the language structures elicited by the IELTS tests are representative of the language required in academic writing. Investigating aspects of language, such as the lexicon, should help to assess the validity of the IELTS test as a predictor of university performance. Lexical bundles are groups of words that frequently co-occur and therefore form recognisable clusters that become associated with particular styles of writing. Given that there are marked differences in the use of bundles both within genres and within academic disciplines, university students need to master the lexical bundles particular to their fields in order to display proficiency in the subject in their writing. The study reported on in this paper is based on a corpus of IELTS Task 2 writing tests as well as a corpus of essays, both of which were written by the same first-year psychology students. These corpora were developed to investigate the lexical bundles typical of these two types of academic genres in order to determine the degree of overlap, and therefore assess the validity of Task 2 of the IELTS test as a measure of the style of writing expected from undergraduate students. An analysis of the most frequently occurring 4-word lexical bundles within each corpus was conducted using WordSmith Tools, a computer programme designed for the investigation of aspects of vocabulary within large bodies of texts. The findings show that there are considerable differences in the lexical bundles used as a result of different basic requirements within each essay type. While Task 2 of the IELTS test requires students to present an opinion-based argument, academic essays are based on a number of sources obtained from the relevant literature. Consequently, following from the categorisation of lexical bundles reported in the literature, the lexical bundles in the IELTS test were found to be typical of spoken discourse, whereas those in academic essays are typical of written discourse. A possible implication of this finding is that the current style of the IELTS Task 2 writing test does not serve as a suitable predictor of university performance.
Investigations into the vocabulary size of mother-tongue speakers of English have led to a range of different findings. A survey of results reveals estimations which vary from 3 000 to 216 000 words. This paper examines possible reasons for the discrepancy in results, primarily, the assumptions made by researchers as to what constitutes a word and the issue of what it means to know a word. Some consideration is also given to the procedures followed in compiling a vocabulary test. 96
An aspect of vocabulary research that tends to be somewhat neglected is that based on qualitative investigation. While a number of studies have considered the differences in vocabulary size between first-language (L1) and additional language (AL) speakers of English, there has been relatively little in-depth investigation into the nature of the vocabulary differences between these groups. The aim of this paper is to shed light on some of the vocabulary features of both L1 and AL student writing in relation to published writing as a benchmark. This study is based on the results of a qualitative investigation conducted using a corpus-driven approach which focused on differences in the use of academic vocabulary by both L1 and AL groups across first-, second-and third-year psychology students. The method used to identify vocabulary differences was keyness analysis, in which vocabulary items are compared on the basis of significantly different frequencies. One of the patterns that emerged serves to support the assumption that L1 students have a better grasp of academic vocabulary than AL students, as there are a greater number of grammatical, semantic and collocational idiosyncrasies in AL writing. The analysis also confirms that high achievers tend to use a broader range of academic words than low achievers. Given the evidence that a good knowledge of academic vocabulary in particular is essential for success at the level of tertiary education, the results of this study contribute to the question of what the specific vocabulary needs of undergraduate students are within the university context.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.