No abstract

BackgroundOne of the most important decisions that emergency department (ED) physicians make is patient disposition (admission vs discharge).ObjectivesTo determine how ED physicians perceive their discharge decisions for high-acuity patients and the impact on adverse events (adverse outcomes associated with healthcare management).MethodsWe conducted a real-time survey of staff ED physicians discharging consecutive patients from high-acuity areas of a tertiary care ED. We asked open-ended questions about rationale for discharge decisions and use of clinical judgement versus evidence. We searched for 30-day flagged outcomes (deaths, unscheduled admissions, ED or clinic visits). Three trained blinded ED physicians independently reviewed these for adverse events and preventability. We resolved disagreements by consensus. We used descriptive statistics and 95% CIs.ResultsWe interviewed 88.9% (32/36) of possible ED physicians for 366 discharge decisions. Respondents were mostly male (71.9%) and experienced (53.1% >10 years). ED physicians stated they used clinical judgement in 87.6% of decisions and evidence in 12.4%. There were 69 flagged outcomes (18.8%) and 10 adverse events (2.7%, 95% CI 1.1 to 4.5%). All adverse events were preventable (1 death, 4 admissions, 5 return ED visits). No significant associations occurred between decision-making rationale and adverse events.ConclusionsExperienced ED physicians most often relied on clinical acumen rather than evidence-based guidelines when discharging patients from ED high-acuity areas. Neither approach was associated with adverse events. In order to improve the safety of discharge decisions, further research should focus on decision support solutions and feedback interventions.

Health Care Workers (HCWs) are the backbone of Ontario’s COVID-19 pandemic response and are a key vaccination priority group. About 80% of Ontario HCWs intend to receive COVID-19 vaccine.1 Challenges include the logistics of delivering the vaccine to this mobile and diverse group and improving vaccine confidence in the remaining 20%. These challenges can be overcome by allaying safety concerns and highlighting personal benefits; tailoring messages to factors associated with lower intention (e.g. age, gender, ethnicity and work setting); employing trusted leaders to set the tone and peers to build social norms; and leveraging public health organizations and health institutions as existing channels of influence.

Objectives Partner notification services for reportable sexually transmitted infections vary based on jurisdiction, resources, type of infection, and whether an outbreak has been reported. The objective of this study was to determine whether case finding increased after implementation of enhanced notification and follow-up activities for contacts of cases of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Central Zone, the largest health authority in Nova Scotia, Canada. Methods Enhanced contact tracing by public health professionals was implemented in May 2015. N. gonorrhoeae multiantigen sequence typing (NG-MAST) was conducted on all positive specimens. Epidemiologic and NG-MAST information for reported gonorrhea cases were captured and analyzed. Case numbers, rates, and NG-MAST results in the preintervention and postintervention periods were compared. Laboratory testing data were extracted and analyzed for association with reported incidence. Results There was a significant increase in the number of reported gonorrhea cases per month when comparing the preintervention and postintervention periods. The reported gonorrhea rate in 2016 was 2.9 times that in 2014. This increase was not associated with changes in testing rates and was more pronounced among women than men. Larger groups of cases sharing the same NG-MAST profiles were detected postintervention. Conclusions The implementation of an enhanced contact tracing program for N. gonorrhoeae resulted in increased case finding and a notable increase in the reported rate of cases per 100,000 population. Owing to these findings, the practice of enhanced partner notification was continued as standard public health practice in Central Zone. An understanding of case finding efforts is required when interpreting observed trends in rates of N. gonorrhoeae, as early infection is highly asymptomatic in women and can be asymptomatic in men.