Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) are important environmental contaminants, yet relatively few analytical reference standards exist for this class. Nontarget analyses performed by means of high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) are increasingly common for the discovery and identification of PFASs in environmental and biological samples. The certainty of PFAS identifications made via HRMS must be communicated through a reliable and harmonized approach. Here, we present a confidence scale along with identification criteria specific to suspect or nontarget analysis of PFASs by means of nontarget HRMS. Confidence levels range from level 1a—“Confirmed by Reference Standard,” and level 1b—“Indistinguishable from Reference Standard,” to level 5—“Exact Masses of Interest,” which are identified by suspect screening or data filtering, two common forms of feature prioritization. This confidence scale is consistent with general criteria for communicating confidence in the identification of small organic molecules by HRMS (e.g., through a match to analytical reference standards, library MS/MS, and/or retention times) but incorporates the specific conventions and tools used in PFAS classification and analysis (e.g., detection of homologous series and specific ranges of mass defects). Our scale clarifies the level of certainty in PFAS identification and, in doing so, facilitates more efficient identification.

Information is needed on the concentration of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in foams on surface waters impacted by aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF). Nine pairs of foam and underlying bulk water were collected from a single freshwater lake impacted by PFAS and analyzed for PFAS by liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-QToF) and for dissolved organic carbon (DOC). The DOC of two foam:bulk water pairs was characterized by 1H NMR. Foams were comprised of 16 PFAS with concentrations as high as 97 000 ng/L (PFOS) along with longer-chain, more hydrophobic PFAS. Only five PFAS (PFOS and shorter chain lengths) were quantified in underlying bulk waters. Enrichment factors (foam:bulk water) ranged from 10 (PFHxA) up to 2830 (PFOS). Foams impacted by AFFF gave the greatest concentrations and number of PFAS classes with PFOS concentrations exceeding the EPA health advisory level (70 ng/L). PFAS concentrations were significantly below published critical micelle concentrations and constituted <0.1% of overall DOC concentrations in foam, indicating that PFAS are a minor fraction of DOC and that DOC likely plays a central role in foam formation. Estimates indicate that foam ingestion is a potentially important route of exposure for children and adults when they are in surface waters where foam is present.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract