L1 elements represent the only currently active, autonomous retrotransposon in the human genome, and they make major contributions to human genetic instability. The vast majority of the 500 000 L1 elements in the genome are defective, and only a relatively few can contribute to the retrotransposition process. However, there is currently no comprehensive approach to identify the specific loci that are actively transcribed separate from the excess of L1-related sequences that are co-transcribed within genes. We have developed RNA-Seq procedures, as well as a 1200 bp 5΄ RACE product coupled with PACBio sequencing that can identify the specific L1 loci that contribute most of the L1-related RNA reads. At least 99% of L1-related sequences found in RNA do not arise from the L1 promoter, instead representing pieces of L1 incorporated in other cellular RNAs. In any given cell type a relatively few active L1 loci contribute to the ‘authentic’ L1 transcripts that arise from the L1 promoter, with significantly different loci seen expressed in different tissues.

Alu elements make up the largest family of human mobile elements, numbering 1.1 million copies and comprising 11% of the human genome. As a consequence of evolution and genetic drift, Alu elements of various sequence divergence exist throughout the human genome. Alu/Alu recombination has been shown to cause approximately 0.5% of new human genetic diseases and contribute to extensive genomic structural variation. To begin understanding the molecular mechanisms leading to these rearrangements in mammalian cells, we constructed Alu/Alu recombination reporter cell lines containing Alu elements ranging in sequence divergence from 0%-30% that allow detection of both Alu/Alu recombination and large non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) deletions that range from 1.0 to 1.9 kb in size. Introduction of as little as 0.7% sequence divergence between Alu elements resulted in a significant reduction in recombination, which indicates even small degrees of sequence divergence reduce the efficiency of homology-directed DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair. Further reduction in recombination was observed in a sequence divergence-dependent manner for diverged Alu/Alu recombination constructs with up to 10% sequence divergence. With greater levels of sequence divergence (15%-30%), we observed a significant increase in DSB repair due to a shift from Alu/Alu recombination to variable-length NHEJ which removes sequence between the two Alu elements. This increase in NHEJ deletions depends on the presence of Alu sequence homeology (similar but not identical sequences). Analysis of recombination products revealed that Alu/Alu recombination junctions occur more frequently in the first 100 bp of the Alu element within our reporter assay, just as they do in genomic Alu/Alu recombination events. This is the first extensive study characterizing the influence of Alu element sequence divergence on DNA repair, which will inform predictions regarding the effect of Alu element sequence divergence on both the rate and nature of DNA repair events.

BackgroundMobile group II introns insert site-specifically into DNA target sites by a mechanism termed retrohoming in which the excised intron RNA reverse splices into a DNA strand and is reverse transcribed by the intron-encoded protein. Retrohoming is mediated by a ribonucleoprotein particle that contains the intron-encoded protein and excised intron RNA, with target specificity determined largely by base pairing of the intron RNA to the DNA target sequence. This feature enabled the development of mobile group II introns into bacterial gene targeting vectors (“targetrons”) with programmable target specificity. Thus far, however, efficient group II intron-based gene targeting reactions have not been demonstrated in eukaryotes.Methodology/Principal FindingsBy using a plasmid-based Xenopus laevis oocyte microinjection assay, we show that group II intron RNPs can integrate efficiently into target DNAs in a eukaryotic nucleus, but the reaction is limited by low Mg2+ concentrations. By supplying additional Mg2+, site-specific integration occurs in up to 38% of plasmid target sites. The integration products isolated from X. laevis nuclei are sensitive to restriction enzymes specific for double-stranded DNA, indicating second-strand synthesis via host enzymes. We also show that group II intron RNPs containing either lariat or linear intron RNA can introduce a double-strand break into a plasmid target site, thereby stimulating homologous recombination with a co-transformed DNA fragment at frequencies up to 4.8% of target sites. Chromatinization of the target DNA inhibits both types of targeting reactions, presumably by impeding RNP access. However, by using similar RNP microinjection methods, we show efficient Mg2+-dependent group II intron integration into plasmid target sites in zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos and into plasmid and chromosomal target sites in Drosophila melanogster embryos, indicating that DNA replication can mitigate effects of chromatinization.Conclusions/SignificanceOur results provide an experimental foundation for the development of group II intron-based gene targeting methods for higher organisms.

Long interspersed elements 1 (L1) are active mobile elements that constitute almost 17% of the human genome. They amplify through a “copy-and-paste” mechanism termed retrotransposition, and de novo insertions related to these elements have been reported to cause 0.2% of genetic diseases. Our previous data demonstrated that the endonuclease complex ERCC1-XPF, which cleaves a 3′ DNA flap structure, limits L1 retrotransposition. Although the ERCC1-XPF endonuclease participates in several different DNA repair pathways, such as single-strand annealing, or in telomere maintenance, its recruitment to DNA lesions is best characterized in the nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway. To determine if the NER pathway prevents the insertion of retroelements in the genome, we monitored the retrotransposition efficiencies of engineered L1 elements in NER-deficient cells and in their complemented versions. Core proteins of the NER pathway, XPD and XPA, and the lesion binding protein, XPC, are involved in limiting L1 retrotransposition. In addition, sequence analysis of recovered de novo L1 inserts and their genomic locations in NER-deficient cells demonstrated the presence of abnormally large duplications at the site of insertion, suggesting that NER proteins may also play a role in the normal L1 insertion process. Here, we propose new functions for the NER pathway in the maintenance of genome integrity: limitation of insertional mutations caused by retrotransposons and the prevention of potentially mutagenic large genomic duplications at the site of retrotransposon insertion events.

Mobile group II introns retrohome by an RNP-based mechanism in which the excised intron lariat RNA fully reverse splices into a DNA site via 2 sequential transesterification reactions and is reverse transcribed by the associated intron-encoded protein. However, linear group II intron RNAs, which can arise by either hydrolytic splicing or debranching of lariat RNA, cannot carry out both reverse-splicing steps and were thus expected to be immobile. Here, we used facile microinjection assays in 2 eukaryotic systems, Xenopus laevis oocyte nuclei and Drosophila melanogaster embryos, to show that group II intron RNPs containing linear intron RNA can retrohome by carrying out the first step of reverse splicing into a DNA site, thereby ligating the 3 end of the intron RNA to the 5 end of the downstream exon DNA. The attached linear intron RNA is then reverse transcribed, yielding an intron cDNA whose free end is linked to the upstream exon DNA. Some of these retrohoming events result in the precise insertion of full-length intron. Most, however, yield aberrant 5 junctions with 5 exon resections, 5 intron truncations, and/or extra nucleotide residues, hallmarks of nonhomologous end-joining. Our findings reveal a mobility mechanism for linear group II intron RNAs, show how group II introns can co-opt different DNA repair pathways for retrohoming, and suggest that linear group II intron RNAs might be used for site-specific DNA integration in gene targeting.DNA repair ͉ gene targeting ͉ retrotransposition ͉ reverse transcriptase ͉ ribozyme M obile group II introns found in bacterial and organellar genomes are retroelements that consist of an autocatalytic intron RNA and an intron-encoded protein (IEP) with reverse transcriptase (RT) activity (1, 2). The intron RNA and IEP function together in a ribonucleoprotein particle (RNP) to promote the integration of the intron into specific DNA sites by a mechanism in which the intron RNA reverse splices directly into a DNA strand and is then reverse transcribed by the IEP (1). Group II introns use this mechanism both to retrohome to the ligated-exon junction (homing site) in intronless alleles at high frequency and to retrotranspose to ectopic sites that resemble the normal homing site at low frequency. These processes enabled the dispersal of mobile group II introns to diverse bacteria and may have been used for the invasion and proliferation of group II introns in the nuclear genomes of early eukaryotes, where they evolved into spliceosomal introns (1,3,4).Like spliceosomal introns, most group II introns splice via 2 sequential transesterification reactions that result in the formation of an intron lariat RNA (2). For mobile group II introns, the splicing reactions are assisted by the IEP, which binds specifically to the intron RNA to stabilize the catalytically active RNA structure (5). The IEP then remains bound to the excised intron lariat RNA in an RNP that promotes intron mobility (6). RNPs initiate intron mobility by recognizing DNA target sites using both the IEP and base p...