The language of ageism is rooted in both explicit actions and implicit attitudes which make it highly complex and difficult to identify. Continued examination of linguistic encoding is needed in order to recognize and rectify language-based age discrimination.

No abstract

No abstract

College students' attitudes about the pervasive thin ideal have been well-studied, but the relationship between the thin ideal and youth ideal in young adults forming life-long health attitudes is understudied. This cross-sectional study examined body image, aging anxiety, ageism, and gender in a sample of 485 undergraduate students. Results from this study demonstrate associations among components of objectified body consciousness (surveillance, shame, and control), body image avoidance, aging anxiety (fear of older people, psychological concerns, physical appearance, and fear of losses), ageism, and gender. Educational efforts that address body image in relation to aging anxiety and ageism are discussed.

This article provides an integrative presentation regarding ageism within the professional culture of gerontological research by examining the operationalization of subjective age, a construct most commonly assessed by asking an individual to report how "old" they feel. According to the life span perspective [Baltes, P. B. (1987). Theoretical propositions of lifespan developmental psychology: On the dynamics between growth and decline. Developmental Psychology, 23, 611-626] and the life course perspective [Elder Jr, G. H. (1975). Age differentiation and the life course. Annual Review of Sociology, 1(1), 165-190.], growing older represents a complex, multidirectional process that encompasses maintenance, growth and decline as well as cultural factors that influence development. Viewing the construct of subjective age from these perspectives casts doubt on the validity of its operationalization. This article argues that operationalizing subjective age in this manner contributes to the dominant societal view of aging as decline by perpetuating the use of the term "old" as an undesirable state. As well, we purport that as gerontological researchers and scholars our professional code of ethics requires us to examine the unintentional communication and perpetuation of ageism by focusing attention on our own use of language.