Japanese fertile men had a semen quality at the level of Danish men, who have been reported to have the lowest among investigated men in Europe. The low level of semen quality of the fertile Japanese men may be due to lifestyle or other environmental factors; however, ethnic differences caused by different genetic variation or combinations cannot be ruled out by this study.

To characterize gastrointestinal cancer survivors' ability to psychologically adjust, we examined the relationship between psychological characteristics (quality of life (QOL), anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress symptoms) and self-efficacy (perceived ability to initiate coping strategies). Forty-seven subjects (32 males and 15 females) were recruited from outpatient clinics or general surgical wards after readmission for therapy unrelated to cancer. All had undergone treatment for gastrointestinal cancer. Japanese version of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy--General (FACT-G), Japanese version of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Japanese version of Impact of Event Scale--Revised (IES-R), and The Self-Efficacy Scale for Advanced Cancer (SEAC) were administered. Correlation analyses revealed a statistically significant positive correlation between three subscales of SEAC and QOL (total of FACT-G value) and a significant negative correlation between anxiety, depression (the total of HADS value), post-traumatic stress symptoms (the total of IES-R value), and SEAC. In multiple regression analysis, the influence from Affect Regulation Efficacy (subscale of SEAC) was the largest in anxiety and post-traumatic stress symptoms while the influence from Activities of Daily Living Efficacy (subscale of SEAC) was the largest in QOL and depression. Our findings revealed that a strong relationship between self-efficacy and psychological adjustment, and that there should be several psychological intervention forms performed at various treatment stages to enhance self-efficacy in this population of gastrointestinal cancer survivors. These results also imply the effectiveness of interventions on self-efficacy for gastrointestinal cancer survivors and the influence of psychological factors such as QOL, anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress symptoms.

No abstract

This study sought to characterize the psychological status of digestive cancer patients, and to investigate the relationship between psychological characteristics and clinical factors. Subjects were 85 inpatients scheduled to undergo surgery for digestive cancer and 26 control patients. The Japanese versions of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Zung's Self Rating Depression Scale (SDS) were administered for all subjects before surgery, before discharge, and 6 months after discharge. Changes in HADS and SDS scores across the three examination days for three groups of subjects (advanced-phase, early phase, and control groups) were compared. The mean scores of anxiety and depression were significantly higher in the advanced-phase group than in the other two groups. Examination day showed a significant effect on depression; depression increased from before surgery to before discharge, and did not return to the preoperative level at 6 months after discharge, but no significant effect on anxiety. As for the relationship between psychological trends and clinical factors, anxiety in the 'middle age' and 'chemotherapy' groups was more severe than in the 'elderly' and 'no chemotherapy' groups. Depression in the 'medical treatment equipment', 'chemotherapy', and 'long-term hospitalization' groups was more severe than in the 'no equipment', 'no chemotherapy', and 'standard-term hospitalization' groups. These results suggest that we should pay careful attention to cancer patients undergoing surgery, especially young patients who are constantly at risk of anxiety, and assess their depression taking into account their disease and treatment conditions, especially after the time when their discharge is determined.

The purpose of this study was to assess the pre- and postoperative quality of life (QOL) of patients with gastrointestinal cancer and to investigate the relationship between QOL and various psychological and clinical factors. Eighty-five patients who underwent surgery for gastrointestinal cancer and 26 control patients undergoing surgery for digestive diseases other than cancer were interviewed. Two tests were administered to assess QOL and psychological status respectively: the Japanese-language version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 and the Japanese-language version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Each test was administered before surgery, before discharge, and 6 months after discharge. Gastrointestinal tumors were localized to the stomach, colon, or rectum in 88% of cases and classified as advanced stage or early stage according to staging protocols. Changes in EORTC QLQ-C30 subscale scores over time were compared among advanced stage, early stage, and control patients. All groups showed significant changes in subscale scores of QOL; the scores of the advanced-stage group indicated worse QOL than the early-stage and control groups in a lot of areas. The physical function (PF2) QOL subscore was influenced by diagnosis, postoperative complications, medical equipment at discharge, and the length of admission and negatively correlated with depression and anxiety. These results suggest that QOL in gastrointestinal cancer patients is variable over time and is influenced by various clinical factors. Therefore, consideration of these clinical factors is paramount to the optimal care of gastrointestinal cancer patients.