The availability of high-quality juveniles is a bottleneck in the farming of many marine fish species. Detrimental larvae-microbe interactions are a main reason for poor viability and quality in larval rearing. In this review, we explore the microbial community of fish larvae from an ecological and eco-physiological perspective, with the aim to develop the knowledge basis for microbial management. The larvae are exposed to a huge number of microbes from external and internal sources in intensive aquaculture, but their relative importance depend on the rearing technology used (especially flow-through vs. recirculating systems) and the retention time of the water in the fish tanks. Generally, focus has been on microbes entering the system, but microbes from growth within the system is normally a substantial part of the microbes encountered by larvae. Culture independent methods have revealed an unexpected high richness of bacterial species associated with larvae, with 100–250 operational taxonomic units associated with one individual. The microbiota of larvae changes rapidly until metamorphosis, most likely due to changes in the selection pressure in the digestive tract caused by changes in host-microbe and microbe-microbe interactions. Even though the microbiota of larvae is distinctly different from the microbiota of the water and the live food, the microbiota of the water strongly affects the microbiota of the larvae. We are in the early phase of understanding larvae-microbe interactions in vivo, but some studies with other animals than fish emphasize that we so far have underestimated the complexity of these interactions. We present examples demonstrating the diversity of these interactions. A large variety of microbial management methods exist, focusing on non-selective reduction of microbes, selective enhancement of microbes, and on improvement of the resistance of larvae against microbes. However, relatively few methods have been studied extensively. We believe that there is a lot to gain by increasing the diversity of approaches for microbial management. As many microbial management methods are perturbations of the microbial community, we argue that ecological theory is needed to foresee and test for longer term consequences in microbe-microbe and microbe-larvae interactions. We finally make some recommendations for future research and development.

No abstract

No abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the effect of the transfer from freshwater to seawater on the distal intestinal bacterial communities of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) and to evaluate the effect of dietary inclusion of Pediococcus acidilactici MA18/5M (at 1.19 × 106 CFU/g). In this context, fish health and antiviral response were also investigated. A 12-week feeding trial was conducted in a flow-through rearing system involving 6 weeks in freshwater and 6 weeks in seawater. Fish received a control and probiotic diet. The composition of the salmon gut bacterial communities was determined by high-throughput sequencing of digesta and mucosa samples from both the freshwater and seawater stage. The main phyla detected during both freshwater and seawater stages were Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Fusobacteria, and Actinobacteria. Significant differences were observed between the intestinal microbiota in the digesta and the mucosa. Both probiotic supplementation and the seawater transfer (SWT) had a substantial impact on the microbial communities, with most pronounced changes detected in the mucosal communities after SWT. This last finding together with a significantly higher antiviral response (mx-1 and tlr3 gene expression) in the distal intestine of fish fed the probiotic diet suggest a causal link between the microbiota modulation and activation of antiviral response. Feeding probiotics during the freshwater stage did not significantly increase survival after infectious pancreatic necrosis virus (IPNV) challenge after SWT, although higher survival was observed in one out of two replicate challenge tanks. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that both dietary probiotic supplementation and transfer from freshwater to seawater have an important role in modulating the bacterial communities in the distal intestine of Atlantic salmon. Furthermore, supplementation of the diet with P. acidilactici MA18/5M can modulate antiviral response.

Enterococci are among the most common human intestinal lactic acid bacteria, and they are known to produce bacteriocins. In this study, fecal enterococci were isolated from infants and screened for bacteriocin production. Bacteriocin-producing Enterococcus avium isolates were obtained, and a new pediocin-like bacteriocin was purified and characterized. This bacteriocin, termed avicin A, was found to be produced by isolates from two healthy infants. It was purified to homogeneity from culture supernatant by ion-exchange and reversed-phase chromatography, and part of its amino acid sequence was obtained. The sequence of a 7-kb DNA fragment of a bacteriocin locus was determined by PCR and DNA sequencing. The bacteriocin locus was organized into four operon-like structures consisting of (i) the structural genes encoding avicin A and its immunity protein, (ii) a divergicin-like bacteriocin (avicin B) gene, (iii) an ABC bacteriocin transporter gene and two regulatory genes (histamine protein kinase-and response regulator-encoding genes), and (iv) induction peptide pheromone-and transport accessory protein-encoding genes. It was shown that the production of avicin A was regulated by the peptide pheromone-inducible regulatory system. Avicin A shows very high levels of similarity to mundticin KS and enterocin CRL35. This bacteriocin showed strong antimicrobial activity against many species of Gram-positive bacteria, including the food-borne pathogen Listeria monocytogenes. The avicin A locus is the first bacteriocin locus identified in E. avium to be characterized at the molecular level.Bacteriocins are ribosomally synthesized antimicrobial peptides and proteins. Production of these compounds is widespread in Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria (23). Bacteriocins produced by lactic acid bacteria (LAB) have recently been classified into two major categories: the lantibiotics or lanthionine-containing bacteriocins (class I) and the nonlanthionine-containing bacteriocins (class II) (5). According to this classification, the former class III bacteriocins (large heatlabile bacteriocins) were considered nonbacteriocins and hence designated bacteriolysins. The class II bacteriocins are further subdivided into four subclasses: subclass IIa (pediocinlike bacteriocins), subclass IIb (two-peptide bacteriocins), subclass IIc (cyclic bacteriocins), and subclass IId (nonpediocin linear peptide bacteriocins). Class II bacteriocins are most commonly found in enterococci. The subclass IIa bacteriocins are known for their strong antilisterial activity, and they are distinguished by their N-terminal conserved YYGNG motif and two covalently S-S-linked cysteines separated by four amino acid residues (11).The production of subclass IIa bacteriocins usually requires four genes: a bacteriocin gene (which encodes the bacteriocin precursor), an immunity gene (which protects the producer from its bacteriocin), and the ABC transporter and transport accessory genes (31, 44). Bacteriocins are synthesized as biologically inactive prepeptides (pre...