Implementing an oncology financial navigation program is feasible, provides concrete assistance in navigating the cost of care, and mitigates anxiety about costs in a subset of patients. Future work will focus on measuring the program's impact on financial and clinical outcomes.
Our understanding of the internal history of Egypt from 664 to 332 bc rests on a limited patchwork of hieroglyphic inscriptions and cursive texts in hieratic or demotic, Aramaic or Greek. By contrast, Egypt’s place in the wider world has to be reconstructed from foreign sources—Assyrian, Babylonian, Hebrew, and Greek—supplemented by Egyptian artefacts from the Mediterranean and Near East. At the interface sits the account of Egypt written by Herodotus in the fifth century bc. The ways in which this diversity of evidence has shaped modern interpretation of Egyptian history in this period are here explored.
e18079 Background: Although financial toxicity is associated with poorer clinical outcomes in cancer survivors, few studies have attempted to address this toxicity. We developed a financial navigation program in collaboration with our partners (Consumer Education and Training Services (CENTS) and Patient Advocate Foundation (PAF)) to improve patients’ knowledge about cancer treatment costs, provide financial counseling, and help with out-of-pocket expenses. We conducted a pilot study to assess feasibility and early impact of this program. Methods: Patients (pts) within 1 year of a solid tumor diagnosis and 6 months of chemotherapy and/or radiation were recruited at the Seattle Cancer Care Alliance. Pts received a financial education course followed by monthly contact with a CENTS financial counselor and PAF case manager for 6 months. We measured program adherence, self-reported financial burden, anxiety about costs, program satisfaction, and type and amount of assistance provided. Results: We consented 34 pts (median age 60.5), the majority of whom were white (85%) and commercially insured (50%). Participants (n = 20) and non-participants (n = 14 who withdrew or were lost to follow up early on) did not differ in age, race, gender, education, income, or insurance type. Debt, income declines, and loans were reported by 55%, 55%, and 30% of pts. High financial burden and anxiety about costs (4 or 5; Likert scale) were reported by 37% and 47% of pts. High satisfaction with the education course, CENTS counselors, and PAF case managers were reported by 73%, 80%, and 91% of pts. CENTS counselors assisted pts most often with budgeting, retirement planning, and medical bill questions. PAF case managers assisted pts with gaps in insurance, debt or cost of living issues, and employment rights and disability applications. A total of $7,667 ($1,267 for pts and $6,400 for institutions) was obtained through charitable entities. Conclusions: Our findings confirm that a financial navigation program is feasible to implement, associated with high satisfaction, and provides concrete assistance to pts in navigating the cost of cancer care. Future work will focus on improving program adherence and measuring its impact on financial and clinical outcomes.
174 Background: Few studies have reported on interventions to alleviate financial toxicity (FT) in cancer patients (pts) and informal caregivers (cgs). We developed a financial navigation program in collaboration with Consumer Education and Training Services (CENTS), Patient Advocate Foundation (PAF), and Family Reach Foundation (FRF), to offer financial coaching, insurance navigation, and assistance with unpaid non-medical bills. We conducted a pilot study to assess feasibility of enrolling cgs with pts and to describe the assistance provided. Methods: Pts with any stage solid tumor actively receiving treatment (tx) at the Seattle Cancer Care Alliance were asked to identify a cg who could participate. Pts or pt/cg dyads received an online financial education course and monthly contact for 6 months (mo) with CENTS and PAF. Subjects were referred to FRF for assistance in paying non-medical bills. We describe pt and cg characteristics, and assistance provided by the program. Results: Of 54 pts approached, 30 (median age 59.5, 61% white, 97% stage III/IV disease) were consented. Most pts (53%) had income ≤ $25,000, and all were insured (48% commercial, 28% Medicare, 21% Medicaid). 18 cgs (67% spouse/partner) were consented. At consent, 55% of pts reported debt in the prior 3 mo. Mean score using the COST PRO FT measure (range 0-44, lower score = higher FT) was 17.4 at baseline. After pts’ physical health, out-of-pocket costs were the most stressful aspects of tx for cgs. Cgs with high financial burden from caregiving more often reported taking on new debt, dipping into retirement accounts, or changing their jobs or hours. CENTS coaches assisted with budgeting, updating wills, and employment rights counsel. PAF case managers assisted with financial assistance for drugs, cost of living (e.g. transportation), disability applications, and secured $6,950 in debt relief. FRF dispersed $4,133, primarily for housing expenses. Conclusions: Implementing a financial navigation program that engages both pts and cgs is feasible. This lower income, financially stressed population received $11,000 in financial assistance. Future work will focus on evaluating the impact of this program on financial and psychosocial outcomes in pts and cgs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.