Peri-implantitis is considered to be a multifactorial process involving bacterial contamination of the implant surface. A previous study demonstrated that a combination of toluidine blue O (100 microgram/ml) and irradiation with a diode soft laser with a wavelength of 905 nm results in an elimination of Porphyromonas gingivalis (P. gingivalis), Prevotella intermedia (P. intermedia), and Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans (A. actinomycetemcomitans) on different implant surfaces (machined, plasma-flame-sprayed, etched, hydroxyapatite-coated). The aim of this study was to examine the laser effect in vivo. In 15 patients with IMZ implants who showed clinical and radiographic signs of peri-implantitis, toluidine blue O was applied to the implant surface for 1 min and the surface was then irradiated with a diode soft laser with a wavelength of 690 nm for 60 s. Bacterial samples were taken before and after application of the dye and after lasing. The cultures were evaluated semiquantitatively for A. actinomycetemcomitans, P. gingivalis, and P. intermedia. It was found that the combined treatment reduced the bacterial counts by 2 log steps on average. The application of TBO and laser resulted in a significant reduction (P<0.0001) of the initial values in all 3 groups of bacteria. Complete elimination of bacteria was not achieved.

Tooth-borne anchorage may be one of the greatest limitations of modern orthodontic treatment, because teeth move in response to forces. Previous investigators have placed temporary implants in the median-sagittal palate in order to establish maximum anchorage. This area, however, may be characterized by relatively low vertical bone support. The aim of this study was therefore to find an alternative palatal implant site which offers a higher amount of bone support. This study comprised 22 patients wishing for maximum anchorage underwent presurgical diagnostic evaluation by means of low-dose dental CT. The measuring results regarding vertical bone volume and the position of the neighbouring tooth roots were used as the basis for further treatment. The statistical data analysis indicated an area suitable for implant placement in the group of patients examined. This area was located 6 to 9 mm posterior to the incisive foramen and 3 to 6 mm paramedian, under avoidance of the mid-palatal suture. The patients showed such a great range of variation in vertical bone volume that a preoperative diagnostic evaluation also seems to be recommendable when very short implants are used in order to avoid perforations of the lower nasal duct.

CT is superior to dental radiography in the detection of dental vertical root fractures.

Oral implantology is an established subspecialty of restorative dental and oral surgery. While an extensive body of evidence on the fundamentals of osseointegration and associated factors has been published, marketing-oriented analyses based on representative public opinion polls of implant acceptance, patient-perceived cost and patient satisfaction are scarce. In this study, an attempt was made to address these points by questioning a representative sample of 1000 adults in the household setting. The interviewees were presented with 14 questions. Of those familiar with implants as one of the treatment alternatives, 61% reported they would accept implants if the need arose. Implant acceptance was highest among males and interviewees below the age of 30 years. The interest in implants increased with increasing family incomes. Four percent of those questioned already had implants. Twenty-five percent knew someone who had undergone implant treatment. All those questioned found implant-supported rehabilitation to be very expensive. Many of them blamed the dentists for the high cost. One detail was particularly evident: satisfaction among implanted patients was clearly higher than satisfaction rates perceived by them from what they were told about implants by others. First-hand experiences with implants proved to be less biased than reported second-hand information.

No abstract