ObjectiveTo assess the efficacy and safety of transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE) combined with lenvatinib plus sintilimab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Patients and MethodsThe data of patients with unresectable HCC administered a combination therapy with TACE and lenvatinib plus sintilimab were retrospectively assessed. Patients received lenvatinib orally once daily 2 weeks before TACE, followed by sintilimab administration at 200 mg intravenously on day 1 of a 21-day therapeutic cycle after TACE. The primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DOR) by the modified RECIST criteria.ResultsMedian duration of follow-up was 12.5 months (95%CI 9.1 to 14.8 months). ORR was 46.7% (28/60). Median DOR in confirmed responders was 10.0 months (95%CI 9.0-11.0 months). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 13.3 months (95%CI 11.9-14.7 months). Median overall survival (OS) was 23.6 months (95%CI 22.2-25.0 months).ConclusionsTACE combined with lenvatinib plus sintilimab is a promising therapeutic regimen in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

BackgroundMolecular targeted therapy combined with immunotherapy significantly improves the prognosis of patients with advanced liver cancer. Additionally, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) can improve the prognosis of patients with advanced liver cancer. This real-world study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of HAIC combined with molecular targeted therapy and immunotherapy in the treatment of primary unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC).MethodsA total of 135 patients with uHCC were enrolled in this study. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary endpoint. The efficacy of the combination therapy was assessed based on the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) guidelines. Overall survival (OS), adverse events (AEs) and surgical conversion rate were the secondary endpoints. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to examine independent prognostic factors. For sensitivity analysis, inverse probability weighting (IPW) was used to balance the influence of the tested confounding factors between groups to verify the robustness of conversion surgery for survival benefits. The E-values were estimated to assess robustness to unmeasured confounders.ResultsThe median number of therapies was three. Approximately 60% of the patients had portal vein tumour thrombosis (PVTT). The most common targeted drugs were lenvatinib and bevacizumab, whereas the most common immunotherapy drug was sintilimab. The overall objective response rate (ORR) was 54.1%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 94.6%. A total of 97 (72%) patients experienced AEs of grades 3–4. Fatigue, pain and fever were the most common symptoms of grade 3-4 AEs. The median PFS was 28 months and 7 months in the successful and unsuccessful conversion groups, respectively. The median OS was 30 months and 15 months in the successful and unsuccessful conversion groups, respectively. Successful conversion surgery, sex, hapatic vein invasion, BCLC stage, baseline tumour size, AFP levels and maximum therapeutic response were independent prognostic factors for PFS. Successful conversion surgery, number of interventions, hapatic vein invasion and total bilirubin levels were independent prognostic factors for OS. After IPTW, no standardised differences exceeding 0.1 were found. IPW-adjusted Kaplan–Meier curves showed that successful conversion surgery was an independent prognostic factor for both PFS and OS. The E-values of successful conversion surgery were 7.57 and 6.53 for OS and PFS, respectively, which indicated a relatively robust impact of successful conversion surgery on the prognosis of patients.ConclusionPatients with primary uHCC undergoing HAIC combined with immunotherapy and molecular targeted therapy have a higher tumour regression rate and the side effects are manageable. Patients undergoing surgery after combination therapy have survival benefits.

Purpose MET is a notable driver gene in the diversity of aberrations with clinical relevance, including exon 14 skipping, copy number gain, point mutations, and gene fusions. Compared with the former two, MET fusions are severely under‐reported, leaving a series of unanswered questions. In this study, we addressed this gap by characterizing MET fusions in a large, real‐world Chinese cancer population. Methods We retrospectively included patients with solid tumors who had DNA‐based genome profiles acquired through targeted sequencing from August 2015 to May 2021. MET fusion‐positive (MET+) patients were subsequently selected for clinical and molecular characterization. Results We screened 79,803 patients across 27 tumor types and detected 155 putative MET fusions from 122 patients, resulting in an overall prevalence of 0.15%. Lung cancer comprised the majority of MET+ patients (92, 75.4%). Prevalence was markedly higher in liver cancer, biliary tract cancer, and renal cancer (range 0.52%–0.60%). It was lower in ovarian cancer (0.06%). A substantial proportion (48/58, 82.8%) of unique partners were reported for the first time. High heterogeneity was observed for partners, with ST7, HLA‐DRB1, and KIF5B as the three most common partners. Mutational landscape analysis of lung adenocarcinoma (n = 32) revealed a high prevalence of TP53 in MET+ alterations, EGFR L858R, EGFR L861Q, and MET amplification. Conclusion To our knowledge, this is currently the largest study in characterizing MET fusions. Our findings warrant that further clinical validation and mechanistic study may translate into therapeutic avenues for MET+ cancer patients.

This study aimed to investigate the incidence rate and risk factors for hepatic encephalopathy (HE) among unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) patients with liver cirrhosis who received sorafenib or lenvatinib treatment. Patients and Methods: uHCC patients with cirrhosis who received first-line sorafenib or lenvatinib treatment between September 2014 and February 2021 were continually reviewed in our single-center retrospective study. The Hepatic Encephalopathy Scoring Algorithm was used to evaluate the occurrence and grade of HE during treatment, and logistic regression models were used to further explore the risk factors for HE. Results: A total of 454 eligible patients were enrolled in our study, with 214 and 240 patients in the sorafenib and lenvatinib groups, respectively. At time of data cut-off (2021-12), the incidence of HE in sorafenib group (4.2%, 95% CI:2-7%) was significantly lower than that in lenvatinib group (11.3%,95% CI:7-15%) (p = 0.006), with alcoholic cirrhosis [OR: 5.857 (95%

3064 Background: MET is a driver gene notable in its diversity of clinically relevant aberrations, including exon 14 skipping, copy number gain, point mutations, and gene fusions. Compared with the former two, MET fusions are severely under-reported, leaving unanswered a series of fundamental questions. In this study, we addressed this knowledge gap by screening for and characterizing MET fusions in a real-world, multi-center population of Chinese cancer patients. Methods: We retrospectively included patients with solid tumors and available genome profiles acquired between August 2015 to May 2021. MET fusion-positive ( MET+) patients were subsequently selected for clinical and molecular characterization. Results: A total of 79816 patients across 27 tumor types were screened. We detected 155 putative MET fusions from 122 patients, resulting in an overall prevalence of 0.15%. Lung cancer comprised the majority of MET+ patients (92, 75.4%). Prevalence was markedly higher in liver, biliary tract cancer, and renal cancer (range 0.52%-0.60%) and lower in ovarian cancer (0.06%). A substantial proportion (48/58, 82.8%) of unique partners were reported for the first time. The fusion partners also turned out to be highly heterogeneous, with ST7, HLA-DRB1, and KIF5B as the three most common partners. Mutational landscape analysis of lung adenocarcinoma patients (n = 32) revealed high prevalence of aberrant TP53 in MET+ patients as well as EGFR L858R, L861Q and MET amplification as concurrent alterations. Conclusions: This study is, to our knowledge, currently the largest in characterizing MET fusions. Our findings warrant further clinical validation and mechanistic study that may translate into therapeutic avenues for MET fusion-positive cancer patients.