The results demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of measurement-based care for outpatients with moderate to severe major depression, suggesting that this approach can be incorporated in the clinical care of patients with major depression.

Context Antipsychotic drugs are limited in their ability to improve the overall outcome of schizophrenia. Adding psychosocial treatment may produce greater improvement in functional outcome than does medication treatment alone. Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of antipsychotic medication alone versus combined with psychosocial intervention on outcomes of early stage schizophrenia. Design, Setting, and Participants Randomized controlled trial of a clinical sample of 1268 patients with early stage schizophrenia, conducted at 10 clinical sites in China from 2005–2007. Intervention Patients were randomly assigned to antipsychotic medication treatment only or antipsychotic medication plus 12 months of psychosocial intervention, consisting of psycho-education, family intervention, skills training and cognitive-behavioral therapy, administered over 48 group sessions. Main Outcome Measures The rate of treatment discontinuation or change due to any cause, relapse or remission, and assessments of insight, treatment adherence, quality of life and social functioning. Results The rates of treatment discontinuation or change due to any cause were 32.8% in the combined treatment group and 46.8% in the medication alone group. Comparisons with medication treatment alone showed lower risk for any cause discontinuation with combined treatment (hazard ratios [HR], 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52–0.74; p<0.001); and lower risk for relapse with combined treatment (HR, 0.57; 95%CI, 0.44–0.74; p<0.001). The combined treatment group exhibited greater improvement in insight (p<0.001), social functioning (p=0.002), activities of daily living (p<0.001), and in 4 domains of quality of life as measured by Medical Outcome Study Short-Form 36-item questionnaire (all p-values<0.02). Furthermore, a significantly higher proportion of patients receiving combined treatment obtained employment or accessed education (p=0.001). Conclusions Compared to those receiving medications only, early stage schizophrenia patients receiving medications and psychosocial intervention had a lower rate of treatment discontinuation or change, lower risk of relapse, and improved insight, quality of life and social functioning.

Although morphine is the standard opioid analgesic for pain control and has been widely used, certain drug-induced adverse effects have been reported as intolerable and need to be addressed. Nalbuphine may have a few advantages over morphine in this respect. We aimed to describe the effect of nalbuphine as well as its saftey compared to morphine by analyzing published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with meta-analysis approach. We analysed 15 trials (820 patients). Overall, there was no evidence to show that the effect of pain relief had any difference between nalbuphine and morphine (pooled relative risks [RRs], 1.01; 95% CI, 0.91 to 1.11; P = 0.90). On the other hand, the incidences of pruritus, nausea, vomiting, respiratory depression were significantly lower in nalbuphine group compared with morphine group, and the pooled RRs were 0.78(95%CI, 0.602–0.997; P = 0.048) for nausea, 0.65(95%CI, 0.50–0.85; P = 0.001) for vomiting, 0.17(95%CI, 0.09–0.34; P < 0.0001) for pruritus, and 0.27(95%CI, 0.12–0.57; P = 0.0007) for respiratory depression. The analgesic efficacy of nalbuphine is comparable to morphine, but nalbuphine provides a better safety profile than morphine in the aspect of certain side-effects, especially related to pruritus and respiratory depression.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive and malignant glioma. Currently, a few modern surgical and medical therapeutic strategies are applied for GBM, but the prognosis of GBM patients remains poor, and the average median survival time is only 14.6 months. In this study, we for the first time found that the levels of miR-320a were decreased in both GBM patients and glioma cells. In GBM patients, elevated miR-320a expression was associated with better prognosis. In addition, insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R) was identified as a key direct target of miR-320a. Overexpression of miR-320a led to the inhibition of cell proliferation, migration, invasion, as well as tumorigenesis by targeting IGF-1R, and thus regulated the signaling pathways downstream, including PI3K/AKT and MAPK/ERK. In tumor orthotopic xenograft experiment, the tumor growth was depressed and survival time of mice model was prolonged when miR-320a was overexpressed. Therefore, our results suggested that miR-320a could suppress tumor development and growth by targeting IGF-1R, and miR-320a might serve as a new effective target for anti-cancer therapy strategies.