To investigate the clinical usefulness of subtraction coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) in patients with severe calcification. A 320-row area detector CT system was used in this study. The subjects were 78 patients (47 men and 31 women, 739 years of age) with an Agatston score of >300 who were able to undergo prospective one-beat scanning during a single breath-hold. The CCTA findings were compared against invasive coronary angiography. The diagnostic capabilities of CCTA for the severely calcified segments with and without the additional information provided by subtraction CCTA were compared. Severe calcification was observed in 174 (31.9%) of the 546 segments, and non-assessable regions were observed in 74 (13.6%) of the segments. The addition of subtraction CCTA information improved the diagnostic accuracy for segments with severe calcification from 67.8 to 82.8% on a per-segment basis and from 70.1 to 82.1% on a per-patient basis, with non-assessable segments considered to be stenotic. When non-assessable segments were considered to be an incorrect diagnosis, the diagnostic accuracy was improved from 48.3 to 75.9% on a per-segment basis and from 43.3 to 79.1% on a per-patient basis. In addition, when evaluation was limited to non-assessable segments, subtraction CCTA provided a diagnostic accuracy of 81.1% when non-assessable segments were considered to be stenotic or 66.2% when non-assessable segments were considered to be an incorrect diagnosis. Subtraction CCTA improves the diagnostic capabilities of CCTA in patients with severe calcification.

In conventional coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), metal artifacts are frequently observed where stents are located, making it difficult to evaluate in-stent restenosis. This study was conducted to investigate whether subtraction CCTA can improve diagnostic accuracy in the evaluation of in-stent restenosis. Subtraction CCTA was performed using 320-row CT in 398 patients with previously placed stents who were able to hold their breath for 25 s and in whom mid-diastolic prospective one-beat scanning was possible. Among these patients, 126 patients (94 men and 32 women, age 74 ± 8 years) with 370 stents who also underwent invasive coronary angiography (ICA) were selected as the subjects of this study. With ICA findings considered the gold standard, conventional CCTA was compared against subtraction CCTA to determine whether subtraction can improve diagnostic accuracy in the evaluation of in-stent restenosis. When non-assessable stents were considered to be stenotic, the diagnostic accuracy in the evaluation of in-stent restenosis was 62.7 % for conventional CCTA and 89.5 % for subtraction CCTA. When the non-assessable stents were considered to be non-stenotic the diagnostic accuracy was 90.3 % for conventional CCTA and 94.31 % for subtraction CCTA. When subtraction CCTA was used to evaluate only the 138 stents that were judged to be non-assessable by conventional CCTA, 116 of these stents were judged to be assessable, and the findings for 109 of them agreed with those obtained by ICA. Even for stents with an internal diameter of 2.5-3 mm, the lumen can be evaluated in more than 80 % of patients. Subtraction CCTA provides significantly higher diagnostic accuracy than conventional CCTA in the evaluation of in-stent restenosis.

No abstract

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to retrospectively measure and compare estimated radiation doses between consecutive patient cohorts who underwent coronary imaging CT with 64- and 320-MDCT scanners. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Subjects without arrhythmia (n = 4475) underwent imaging with 64-MDCT (n = 770) and 320-MDCT (n = 3705) scanners and were classified into one of five subgroups according to the patient heart rate and the image acquisition strategy. For all patients, image quality was subjectively evaluated using a 3-point scale. Estimated radiation dose and image quality were compared between subjects stratified by CT scanner and by subgroups imaged with each technology. RESULTS. For patients with a heart rate of 60 beats/min or less, the estimated radiation dose was halved (3.8 ± 2.0 vs 7.6 ± 2.6 mSv) when the 320-MDCT scanner (n = 2787) replaced the 64-MDCT scanner (n = 511). For the entire cohort, image quality score was significantly better (2.9 ± 0.4 vs 2.8 ± 0.5; p < 0.0001) and the effective dose was significantly lower (4.9 ± 3.3 vs 9.9 ± 5.4 mSv; p < 0.0001) for 320-MDCT scanners, compared with 64-MDCT scanners. CONCLUSION. Wide area-detector coronary CT angiography protocols have reduced radiation dose, with image quality maintained at the same level, compared with 64-MDCT technologies.

No abstract