An increase in immunosuppressive myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) is associated with disease progression and treatment resistance in multiple myeloma (MM). We investigated the mechanisms underlying MDSC induction, and sought to discover a strategy for prevention of MDSC induction in MM. Using a transwell co-culture system, four of nine examined human myeloma-derived cell lines (HMCLs) were potent in inducing monocytic (M)-MDSCs from normal peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). As the results, we identified that secretion of CC motif chemokine ligand 5 (CCL5) and macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) by myeloma cells is a prerequisite for induction of MDSCs in MM. The immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) compounds, such as lenalidomide (LEN) and pomalidomide (POM), were identified as potent inhibitors of MDSC induction through bidirectional molecular effects of cereblon (CRBN)-dependent and-independent downregulation of CCL5 and MIF in myeloma cells; and downregulation of CC motif chemokine receptor 5, a receptor for CCL5, and induction of interferon regulatory factor 8, a critical transcription factor for monocytic differentiation, in PBMCs. In the present study of the molecular mechanisms underlying MDSC induction, we identified a novel effect of LEN and POM of inhibiting MDSC induction via overlapping regulatory effects in myeloma cells and normal PBMCs.

Despite the recent therapeutic progress, the prognoses of diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCLs) that concomitantly overexpress c-MYC and BCL2, i.e., double hit lymphoma (DHL) and double expressing lymphoma (DEL), remain poor. This study examined triple targeting of c-MYC, BCL2 and the B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling pathway for DHL and DEL. We first used AZD5153, a novel bivalent inhibitor for bromodomain-containing 4 (BRD4), in DHL- and DEL-derived cell lines, because BRD4 regulates disease type-oriented key molecules for oncogenesis. AZD5153 was more effective than conventional monovalent BRD4 inhibitors, JQ1 and I-BET151, in inhibiting cell proliferation of a DHL-derived cell line and two DEL-derived cell lines, with at least 10-fold lower half growth inhibitory concentrations. AZD5153 caused G1/S cell cycle blockade, while the apoptosis-inducing effect was relatively modest. At the molecular level, AZD5153 was potent in downregulating various molecules for oncogenesis, such as c-MYC, AKT2 and MAP3K; those involved in the BCR signaling pathway, such as CD19, BLNK and CD79B; and those associated with B-cell development, such as IKZF1, IKZF3, PAX5, POU2AF1 and EBF1. In contrast, AZD5153 did not decrease anti-apoptotic BCL2 proteins, and did not activate pro-apoptotic BH3-only proteins, except BAD. To augment cell death induction, we added a novel BH3-mimicking BCL2 inhibitor AZD4320 to AZD5153, and found that these two agents had a mostly synergistic antitumor effect by increasing cells undergoing apoptosis in all three cell lines. These results provide a rationale for dual targeting of BRD4 and BCL2 using AZD5153 and AZD4320 as a therapeutic strategy against DHL and DEL.

Background: Since bromodomain-containing protein 4 (BRD4) facilitates the transcription of genes important for neoplastic cells in a cancer-type specific manner, BRD4-regulated molecules may also include therapeutic targets for mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), a treatment-refractory subtype of malignant lymphoma. Materials and Methods: In order to uncover direct BRD4regulated targets in MCL, we performed integrated analysis using the pathway database and the results of both geneexpression profiling and chromatin immunoprecipitation with parallel sequencing for BRD4. Results: Treatment with BRD4 inhibitor I-BET151 exerted a dose-dependent inhibitory effect on cell proliferation in MCL cell lines. BRD4 was found to directly regulate series of genes involved in the B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling pathway, including B-cell linker (BLNK), paired box 5 (PAX5), and IKAROS family zinc finger 3 (IKZF3), and several oncogenes, such as MYB. Indeed, the combinatory inhibition of BCR pathway and IKZF showed an additive antitumor effect. Conclusion: Concomitant targeting multiple BRD4regulated molecules may constitute a rational therapeutic strategy for MCL. The advent of immunochemotherapy consisting of cytotoxic agents and monoclonal antibodies, such as the antibody to CD20 rituximab, has markedly improved treatment outcomes for the majority of patients with B-cell lymphomas (BCLs). However, several hard-to-treat disease subtypes still exist for which the treatment outcome needs to be improved (1, 2). Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), originating from CD5positive naïve B-lymphocytes, is such a treatment-refractory disease subtype which comprises approximately 3% of all non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs). In addition to the diseasespecific chromosomal translocation t(11;14)(q13;q32) leading to cyclin D1 (CCND1) overexpression in approximately 90% of patients with MCL, there are additional genetic alterations. Abnormal overexpression of sex-determining region Y-box 11 (SOX11), a transcription factor, and cross talk with aberrant activation of several cell signaling pathways, including B-cell receptor (BCR), nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-ĸB), mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), and NOTCH, coordinately promote MCL development and progression (3, 4). Despite the involvement of those known molecular pathways and abnormalities, a promising therapeutic molecular target for MCL has not been defined. The sole inhibition of CCND1 is insufficient for the 77 This article is freely accessible online.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Ruxolitinib is a selective JAK1/2 inhibitor that is widely used for the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), including myelofibrosis and polycythemia vera (PV). Despite its clinical efficacy for MPNs, ruxolitinib possesses immunosuppressive properties that potentially increase the risks for opportunistic infection, such as mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) infection, and reactivation of occult viral infection. Herein, we report the case of a 76-year-old male with PV who developed tuberculosis peritonitis under ruxolitinib therapy for 28 weeks. While previous studies and case reports have suggested an increased risk of MTB infection of various organs during ruxolitinib treatment of MPNs, this case is apparently the first of tuberculosis peritonitis in a patient with MPN treated with ruxolitinib. A review of previous case reports suggests the need for careful observation for MTB from the relatively early phase of ruxolitinib treatment, given that the median duration from the start of ruxolitinib treatment to the emergence of MTB was 20 weeks (range: 3-88 weeks). Clinicians should consider tuberculosis peritonitis as a differential diagnosis when patients with MPN treated with ruxolitinib develop infectious abdominal symptoms.

BH resistance is mediated by overlapping mechanisms with overexpression of ABCB1 and MGST1, and is potentially accompanied by multidrug resistance in MCL.