Background Surgical site infection is a major perioperative issue. The morbidity of surgical site infection is high in major digestive surgery, such as pancreaticoduodenectomy. The comprehensive risk factors, including anesthetic factors, for surgical site infection in pancreaticoduodenectomy are unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the perioperative and anesthetic risk factors of surgical site infection in pancreaticoduodenectomy. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study conducted in a single tertiary care center. A total of 326 consecutive patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy between January 2009 and March 2018 were evaluated. Patients who underwent resection of other organs were excluded. The primary outcome was the incidence of surgical site infection, based on a Clavien-Dindo classification of grade 2 or higher. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate the association between surgical site infection and perioperative and anesthetic factors. Results Of the 326 patients, 116 (35.6%) were women. The median age was 70 years (interquartile range; 64-75). The median duration of surgery was 10.9 hours (interquartile range; 9.5-12.4). Surgical site infection occurred in 60 patients (18.4%). The multivariable analysis revealed that the use of desflurane as a maintenance anesthetic was associated with a significantly lower risk of surgical site infection than sevoflurane (odds ratio, 0.503; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.260-0.973). In contrast, the duration of surgery (odds ratio, 1.162; 95% CI, 1.017-1.328), cerebrovascular disease (odds ratio, 3.544; 95% CI, 1.326-9.469), and ischemic heart disease (odds ratio, 10.839; 95% CI, 1.887-62.249) were identified as significant risk factors of surgical site infection.

An 80‐year‐old woman presented with loss of appetite. At age 78, she was diagnosed as familial neuronal intranuclear inclusion disease (NIID) based on (i) leukoencephalopathy with hyperintensities along the corticomedullary junction on diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) revealed by brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), (ii) skin biopsy samples showing ubiquitin‐positive intranuclear inclusions in adipocytes, and (iii) family history. Her cognitive function was preserved while apathy was apparent. However, on this admission, her cognitive function got worse. Afterward, the patient developed subcortical hemorrhage, and the risk for the hemorrhage was not identified. NIID might be associated with intracranial hemorrhage. In addition, brain MRI after the bleeding showed the rapid expansion of hyperintense lesions on DWI even in the frontal lobe where bleeding was irrelevant. Intracranial hemorrhage might have affected the enlarged hyperintense lesions.