A significant subpopulation of neurons in rat nucleus accumbens (NAc) coexpress dopamine D1 and D2 receptors, which can form a D1-D2 receptor complex, but their relevance in addiction is not known. The existence of the D1-D2 heteromer in the striatum of rat and monkey was established using in situ PLA, in situ FRET and co-immunoprecipitation. In rat, D1-D2 receptor heteromer activation led to place aversion and abolished cocaine CPP and locomotor sensitization, cocaine intravenous self-administration and reinstatement of cocaine seeking, as well as inhibited sucrose preference and abolished the motivation to seek palatable food. Selective disruption of this heteromer by a specific interfering peptide induced reward-like effects and enhanced the above cocaine-induced effects, including at a subthreshold dose of cocaine. The D1-D2 heteromer activated Cdk5/Thr75-DARPP-32 and attenuated cocaine-induced pERK and ΔFosB accumulation, together with inhibition of cocaine-enhanced local field potentials in NAc, blocking thus the signaling pathway activated by cocaine: D1R/cAMP/PKA/Thr34-DARPP-32/pERK with ΔFosB accumulation. In conclusion, our results show that the D1-D2 heteromer exerted tonic inhibitory control of basal natural and cocaine reward, and therefore initiates a fundamental physiologic function that limits the liability to develop cocaine addiction.

Decreases in brain dopamine (DA) lead to catalepsy, quantified by the time a rat remains with its forepaws resting on a suspended horizontal bar. Low doses of the DA D2 receptor-preferring antagonist haloperidol repeatedly injected in a particular environment lead to gradual day-to-day increases in catalepsy (catalepsy sensitization) and subsequent testing following an injection of saline reveal conditioned catalepsy. We tested the hypothesis that D1-like and D2 receptors play different roles in catalepsy sensitization and in acquisition and expression of conditioned catalepsy. Rats were repeatedly treated with the DA D1-like receptor antagonist SCH 23990 (0.05, 0.1 and 0.25 mg/kg i.p.), the D2 receptor-preferring antagonist haloperidol (0.1, 0.25 and 0.5 mg/kg i.p.) or a combination of the two drugs and tested for catalepsy each day in the same environment. Following 10 drug treatment days, rats were injected with saline and tested for conditioned catalepsy in the previously drug-paired environment. Haloperidol did not elicit cataleptic responses in the initial session; however, rats developed sensitization with repeated testing. Significant catalepsy sensitization was not observed in rats repeatedly tested with SCH 23390. When rats were injected and tested with saline following haloperidol sensitization they exhibited conditioned catalepsy in the test environment; conditioned catalepsy was not seen following SCH 23390. Rats treated with 0.05 mg/kg SCH 23390+0.25 mg/kg haloperidol showed catalepsy sensitization but failed to show conditioned catalepsy. Conversely, SCH 23390 (0.05 mg/kg) given on the test day after sensitization to haloperidol (0.25 mg/kg) failed to block conditioned catalepsy. Repeated antagonism of D2 receptors leads to catalepsy sensitization with repeated testing in a specific environment. Conditioned catalepsy requires intact D1-like receptor function during sensitization sessions but not during test sessions. In conclusion, repeated antagonism of D2, but not D1-like receptors leads to catalepsy sensitization with repeated testing in a specific environment. Conditioned catalepsy requires functional D1-like receptors during sensitization sessions but not during test sessions.

Dopamine D(3) receptors (Drd3) have been implicated in the control of responding by drug-related conditioned incentive stimuli. We review recent studies of the effects of Drd3 antagonists or partial agonists on the control of self-administration of intravenous (IV) cocaine, IV morphine and oral ethanol on reward-rich and lean schedules, in reinstatement tests, on second-order schedules and on the acquisition and expression of conditioned place preference (CPP) and conditioned motor activity. For comparison, related studies where conditioned stimuli are based on nutritional reward also are considered. When self-administration depends more heavily on conditioned cues for its maintenance, for example on second-order schedules or lean ratio schedules, Drd3 antagonists or partial agonists reduce responding. Although data are limited, similar effects may be seen for responding for cues based on drugs or nutritional rewards. Drd3 agents also block the ability of conditioned cues to reinstate responding for cocaine or food. Published results suggest that Drd3 plays a more important role in the expression than in the acquisition of a CPP or conditioned motor activity. The mechanism mediating the role of Drd3 in the control of responding by conditioned incentive stimuli remains unknown but it has been found that Drd3 receptors increase in number in the nucleus accumbens during conditioning. Perhaps Drd3 participates in the molecular mechanisms underlying the role of dopamine and of dopamine receptor subtypes in reward-related incentive learning.

No abstract

No abstract