The effects of isavuconazole (active moiety of isavuconazonium sulfate) on cardiac ion channels in vitro and cardiac repolarization clinically were assessed in a phase I, randomized, double‐blind study in healthy individuals who received isavuconazole (after 2‐day loading dose), at therapeutic or supratherapeutic doses daily for 11 days, moxifloxacin (400 mg q.d.), or placebo. A post‐hoc analysis of the phase III SECURE trial assessed effects on cardiac safety. L‐type Ca2+ channels were most sensitive to inhibition by isavuconazole. The 50% inhibitory concentrations for ion channels were higher than maximum serum concentrations of nonprotein‐bound isavuconazole in vivo. In the phase I study (n = 161), isavuconazole shortened the QT interval in a dose‐ and plasma concentration‐related manner. There were no serious treatment‐emergent adverse events; palpitations and tachycardia were observed in placebo and supratherapeutic isavuconazole groups; no cardiac safety signals were detected in the SECURE study (n = 257). Isavuconazole was associated with a shortened cardiac QT interval.
Peficitinib is an orally administered, once-daily Janus kinase inhibitor currently in development for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. It has been shown to be a P-glycoprotein (P-gp) substrate in vitro. The effects of verapamil, an inhibitor of the efflux pump P-gp, on the pharmacokinetic profile of peficitinib were assessed in this open-label, single-center, single-sequence, crossover drug-interaction study. Twenty-four healthy volunteers received a single 150-mg dose of peficitinib on days 1 and 12 of a 14-day treatment period and received verapamil 80 mg 3 times daily on days 5-14. Repeated-dose administration of verapamil increased mean peficitinib AUC , AUC , and C by 27%, 27%, and 39%, respectively, and also increased the mean AUC and C of peficitinib metabolites H1, H2, and H4. Coadministration of verapamil with peficitinib 150 mg was generally well tolerated. Overall, the most commonly reported adverse event was headache, which occurred in 5 subjects (21%); all reported adverse events were grade 1 severity, with the exception of 1 grade 2 incident of vomiting.
Background and ObjectivesFidaxomicin treatment of Clostridium difficile infection is known to produce minimal systemic exposure, as the antibacterial (antibiotic) remains primarily in the gut. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of single and multiple ascending doses of fidaxomicin were evaluated in healthy Japanese and Caucasian subjects.MethodsThirty-six healthy subjects were randomly assigned in a 3:1 ratio to receive either fidaxomicin or placebo. Cohort 1 (100 mg) and Cohort 2 (200 mg) comprised 12 Japanese subjects each and Cohort 3 (200 mg) comprised 12 Caucasian subjects. Subjects received a single dose of the study drug on Day 1 and received multiple doses for 10 days after a wash-out period.ResultsAfter multiple 200 mg dosing of fidaxomicin, both mean maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) in Japanese (8.7 ± 5.3 ng/mL) and Caucasian (7.0 ± 3.7 ng/mL) subjects and the area under the concentration–time curve (AUC) were higher in Japanese subjects (58.5 ± 36.7 ng·h/mL) than in Caucasian subjects (37.6 ± 15.7 ng·h/mL), although variation in both groups was large. The mean fecal concentrations of fidaxomicin in Japanese and Caucasian subjects were 2669 and 2181 μg/g, respectively. The possibly study drug-related adverse events were diarrhea (n = 1), feeling hot (n = 1), and hypersomnia (n = 2), which were mild in severity.ConclusionsIn both Japanese and Caucasian subjects, fidaxomicin demonstrated similarly minimal systemic absorption, and was mainly excreted in feces. Fidaxomicin was safe and well-tolerated in all subjects.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.