It is expected that the number and variety of engineered nanoparticles will increase rapidly over the next few years, and there is a need for new methods to quickly test the potential toxicity of these materials. Because experimental evaluation of the safety of chemicals is expensive and time-consuming, computational methods have been found to be efficient alternatives for predicting the potential toxicity and environmental impact of new nanomaterials before mass production. Here, we show that the quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) method commonly used to predict the physicochemical properties of chemical compounds can be applied to predict the toxicity of various metal oxides. Based on experimental testing, we have developed a model to describe the cytotoxicity of 17 different types of metal oxide nanoparticles to bacteria Escherichia coli. The model reliably predicts the toxicity of all considered compounds, and the methodology is expected to provide guidance for the future design of safe nanomaterials.

The production of nanomaterials increases every year exponentially and therefore the probability these novel materials that they could cause adverse outcomes for human health and the environment also expands rapidly. We proposed two types of mechanisms of toxic action that are collectively applied in a nano-QSAR model, which provides governance over the toxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles to the human keratinocyte cell line (HaCaT). The combined experimental-theoretical studies allowed the development of an interpretative nano-QSAR model describing the toxicity of 18 nano-metal oxides to the HaCaT cell line, which is a common in vitro model for keratinocyte response during toxic dermal exposure. The comparison of the toxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles to bacteria Escherichia coli (prokaryotic system) and a human keratinocyte cell line (eukaryotic system), resulted in the hypothesis that different modes of toxic action occur between prokaryotic and eukaryotic systems.

The most significant achievements and challenges relating to an application of quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) approach in the risk assessment of nanometer‐sized materials are highlighted. Recent advances are discussed in the context of “classical” QSAR methodology. The possible ways for the structural characterization of compounds existing at the nanoscale (at least one dimension of 100 nm or less) are briefly reviewed. The applicability of the existing toxicological data for developing QSAR models is evaluated. Finally, the existing models are presented. The need to develop new interpretative descriptors for the nanosystems is also highlighted. It is suggested that, due to high variability in the molecular structures and different mechanisms of toxicity, individual classes of nanoparticles should be modeled separately.

No abstract

Many metal oxide nanoparticles are able to cause persistent stress to live organisms, including humans, when discharged to the environment. To understand the mechanism of metal oxide nanoparticles' toxicity and reduce the number of experiments, the development of predictive toxicity models is important. In this study, performed on a series of nanoparticles, the comparative quantitative-structure activity relationship (nano-QSAR) analyses of their toxicity towards E. coli and HaCaT cells were established. A new approach for representation of nanoparticles' structure is presented. For description of the supramolecular structure of nanoparticles the "liquid drop" model was applied. It is expected that a novel, proposed approach could be of general use for predictions related to nanomaterials. In addition, in our study fragmental simplex descriptors and several ligand-metal binding characteristics were calculated. The developed nano-QSAR models were validated and reliably predict the toxicity of all studied metal oxide nanoparticles. Based on the comparative analysis of contributed properties in both models the LDM-based descriptors were revealed to have an almost similar level of contribution to toxicity in both cases, while other parameters (van der Waals interactions, electronegativity and metal-ligand binding characteristics) have unequal contribution levels. In addition, the models developed here suggest different mechanisms of nanotoxicity for these two types of cells.

Physico-chemical characterization of nanoparticles in the context of theirs transport and fate in the environment is an important challenge for risk assessment of nanomaterials. One of the main characteristics that define the behavior of nanoparticles in solution is zeta potential (ζ). In this paper we have demonstrated the relationship between zeta potential and a series of intrinsic physico-chemical features of 15 metal oxide nanoparticles revealed by computational study. The developed here Quantitative Structure-Property Relationship model (nano-QSPR) was capable to predict ζ of metal oxide nanoparticles utilizing only two descriptors: (i) the spherical size of nanoparticlesa parameter from numerical analysis of Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) images and (ii) the energy of the highest occupied molecular orbital per metal atom -a theoretical descriptor calculated by quantum mechanics at semiempirical level of theory (PM6 method). The obtained consensus model is characterized by reasonably well predictivity (Q 2 ext =0.87). Therefore, the developed model can be utilized to in silico evaluation of properties of novel engineered nanoparticles. This study is a first step in developing a comprehensive and computationally-based system to predict physico-chemical properties that are responsible for aggregation phenomena in metal oxide nanoparticles.

No abstract

No abstract