Background: Active surveillance (AS) of small, low-risk papillary thyroid cancers (PTCs) is increasingly being considered. There is limited understanding of why individuals with low-risk PTC may choose AS over traditional surgical management. Methods: We present a mixed-methods analysis of a prospective observational real-life decision-making study regarding the choice of thyroidectomy or AS for management of localized, low-risk PTCs <2 cm in maximum diameter (NCT03271892). Patients were provided standardized medical information and were interviewed after making their decision (which dictated disease management). We evaluated patients' levels of decision-self efficacy (confidence in medical decision-making ability) at the time information was presented and their level of decision satisfaction after finalizing their decision (using standardized questionnaires). We asked patients to explain the reason for their choice and qualitatively analyzed the results.

The perceptions of continued smoking after a cancer diagnosis among patients with cancer are strongly associated with smoking cessation. Counseling about the harms of continued smoking in patients with cancer, and in particular among those who have lower risk perceptions, should be considered when developing a smoking cessation program.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

179 Background: Smoking cessation is becoming an integral part of cancer survivorship. To help improve survivorship education, clinicians need an understanding of patient knowledge of the harms of continued smoking. Methods: Patients with various cancer subtypes were surveyed with respect to self-awareness of the harms of continued smoking on cancer outcomes. Multivariable logistic regression models assessed factors associated with the level of awareness. Results: Among 985 patients, 23% smoked at diagnosis; 34% quit > 1 year prior to diagnosis; 25% had lung, 30% had head and neck cancers; 77% received curative therapy. Many patients reported being unaware that smoking can negatively impact cancer surgery (65%), radiation (74%), chemo outcomes (64%), treatment efficacy (70%), cancer prognosis (54%) and second primary development (52%). Among all patients, those smoking at diagnosis were significantly more likely to be unaware of radiation (aOR = 1.73, 95% CI [1.16-2.57]) and chemo (aOR = 2.10 [1.17-3.79]) toxicities, cancer prognosis (aOR = 1.63 [1.16-2.29]) and second primary risk (aOR = 1.61 [1.14-2.26]). Those with poorer health status were more likely unaware of effects on prognosis (aOR = 1.56 [1.18-2.08]) and second primaries (aOR = 1.54 [1.14-2.08]). Patients with non-tobacco related cancers (non-TRCs) were more likely unaware smoking impacts cancer surgery (aOR = 1.45 [1.04-2.04]) and radiation (aOR = 1.37 [1.01-1.85]). Among smokers at diagnosis, those with non-TRCs (aOR = 4.00 [1.45-11.11]) were more likely unaware smoking can impact chemo outcomes. Awareness was not associated with stage, second-hand smoke exposure, cessation or interest in a smoking cessation program (SCP), but was associated with patients believing that a SCP would be beneficial to their health (aORs = 2.33-4.35, P < 0.03). Among smokers at diagnosis, believing that a SCP is beneficial (51%) was associated with both interest in an in-patient (aOR = 4.65 [2.15-10.03]) and ambulatory (aOR = 4.08 [2.14-7.79]) SCP. Conclusions: Many cancer patients were unaware of the harms of continued smoking; mainly smokers at diagnosis and those with non-TRCs. Patient education should focus on emphasizing awareness, which may help improve patient interest in smoking cessation.

251 Background: With improvements in cancer therapies, palliative patients with cancer now enjoy improved and sometimes prolonged survival. Continued smoking after a cancer diagnosis negatively impacts treatment response/toxicities, survival and quality of life and is influenced by SHS exposure. Little is known about the perceptions of palliative patients with cancer in comparison to patients who are considered potentially curative, on smoking after a cancer diagnosis and of SHS exposure. We assessed such potential differences in perception. Methods: Patients with cancer across all sites were surveyed with respect to their smoking habits and perceptions on how smoking and SHS influences cancer-related QofL, fatigue and overall survival (OS). Review of patient charts confirmed which patients were considered palliative versus potentially curative. Multivariable logistic regression models assessed for associations between treatment intent and patient perceptions, adjusted for significant co-variables. Results: Among 985 patients with cancer, 22% were considered palliative; 23% of surveyed patients smoked at diagnosis; 10% continued smoking at follow-up. Most patients perceived that continued smoking and SHS exposure negatively impacted QofL (continued smoking: 83%, SHS: 82%), fatigue (83%, 79%) and OS (86%, 81%). Palliative patients were more likely to believe that SHS worsened their cancer-related fatigue (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.65, 95% CI [1.05-2.56], P = 0.03) and worsened OS (unadjusted OR = 1.92, [1.12-3.33], P= 0.02; aOR = 1.56 [0.98-2.50], P = 0.06). Yet palliative/non-palliative status was not found to be associated with perceived benefits of smoking cessation on QofL, fatigue, or OS (P > 0.10, all comparisons). Conclusions: When compared with non-palliative patients, palliative patients with cancer perceived a greater negative impact of SHS on fatigue and survival, but had similar views of continued smoking after a cancer diagnosis. We are encouraged that palliative status did not lead to patients having diluted perceptions on the negative impact of smoking on cancer outcomes. Health care providers should continue to focus on the positive impacts of smoking cessation and SHS in this setting.

No abstract