The opioid risk tool (ORT) is a commonly employed measure of risk of aberrant drug related behaviors (ADRB) in patients with chronic pain prescribed opioid therapy. In this study the discriminant predictive validity of the ORT was evaluated in a unique cohort of patients with chronic nonmalignant pain (CNMP) on long-term opioid therapy (LTOT) that displayed no evidence of developing an opioid use disorder (OUD) and a sample of patients with CNMP that developed an OUD after commencing opioid therapy. Results revealed that the original ORT was able to discriminate between patients with and without OUDs (OR=1.624; CI 95%: 1.539-1.715, p< 0.001). A weighted ORT eliminating the gender specific history of preadolescent sexual abuse item revealed comparable results (OR= 1.648; CI 95%: 1.539-1.742, p< 0.001). A revised unweighted ORT (ORT-OUD) removing the history of preadolescent sexual abuse item was notably superior in predicting the development of OUD in patients with CNMP on LTOT (OR= 3.085; CI 95%: 2.725-3.493, p< 0.001) with high specificity (0.851; CI 95%: 0.811-0.885), sensitivity (0.854; 95% CI: 0,799-0.898), positive (0.757; CI 95%: 0.709-0.799) and negative (0.914; CI 95%: 0.885-0.937) predictive values. Perspective:The revised ORT (ORT-OUD) is the first tool developed on a unique cohort to predict the risk of developing an OUD in patients with CNMP receiving opioid therapy, as opposed to ADRB that can reflect a number of other issues. The ORT-OUD has clinical utility in providing clinicians a simple, validated method to rapidly screen for the risk of developing OUD in patients on or being considered for opioid therapy.
IntroductionCompetency-based educational models recommend trainee exposure to research, but the best methods for Graduate Medical Education (GME) programs to accomplish this have not been clarified. The objective of this study was to quantify published interventions to generate resident research and compare effectiveness among those interventions.Material and methodsA systematic review of English-language articles of studies of GME programs was performed, describing resident research interventions and quantifying the number of publications as an outcome.ResultsThe search produced 13,688 potentially relevant articles, and included 47 articles in the final synthesis. Publication effectiveness was calculated as publications per year. The top ten programs for publication effectiveness were compared to others for interventions chosen. Interventions were characterized as research director, protected time, research requirement, research mentor, curricula, research assistant, biostatistician, information technology support, research fund, pay-for-performance plans, and celebration of accomplishments. Total number of different interventions was not significantly associated with primary outcome (r = 0.20, p = 0.18). When comparing the top ten programs to the others, appointment of a research director was statistically more prevalent in those programs (70% vs. 30%, p = 0.02), while presence of a defined curriculum was more common (90% vs. 57%, p = 0.052) but not statistically significantly.ConclusionsLeadership interventions (directors, curricula) are associated with successful GME research efforts.
IntroductionSinus infections, sore throats, and upper respiratory tract infections (URI) are common reasons patients seek medical care. Well-established treatment guidelines exist for prescribing antibiotics in these clinical scenarios, but are not often followed.ObjectiveThe objective of this study is to determine practice patterns related to prescribing antibiotics for sinusitis, URI, and pharyngitis. The main hypothesis is that attending physicians improve their adherence to antibiotic guidelines with a learner present.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was performed on patients treated for URI, sinusitis, and pharyngitis at an ambulatory faculty practice. The use of relevant ICD-9 codes from January 1, 2008 to January 30, 2012 resulted in 1,548 patient encounters which were reviewed for guideline adherence. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression was performed for each outcome variable to determine if they influence antibiotic adherence. Variables studied were physician, presence of a learner, BMI, age, gender, day of the week, month, diabetes, immunosuppression, and COPD.ResultsMultivariate analysis showed the statistically significant variables were age (p=0.038) for pharyngitis and provider (p=0.013) for URI. There were no significant findings for sinusitis. Guideline adherence was 24% in patients with pharyngitis, 42% in acute sinusitis, 79% in URI, and 57% overall.ConclusionGuideline adherence varies depending on the treating physician and decreases when treating younger patients with pharyngitis. The presence of a learner did not improve prescribing habits. The reason for these findings remain unclear, but considerations for improvement could include following antibiotic adherence as a quality measure, giving patients handouts educating them about the impact of overprescribing antibiotics, and further education amongst faculty and residents about adhering to nationally recognized guidelines.
Reducing risk factors for patients with vascular disease can reduce the subsequent incidence of cerebro-cardiovascular disease. While physicians have had extensive training in the importance of atherosclerotic vascular disease risk factor modification, evidence suggests that they systematically miss opportunities for clinical prevention during routine practice. The aim of this study was to identify whether physicians felt confident in their knowledge and effectiveness regarding counseling patients to reduce cardiovascular risk and to determine barriers to prevention interventions in the office setting. Surveys were mailed to 509 physicians affiliated with an academic community hospital. Nonrespondents were sent reminders and a second survey. Comparisons were made using chi-square analysis. Two hundred and five surveys were returned (40.3%). Thirty-six percent of physicians felt knowledgeable about weight management techniques, compared to 3% who were confident that they succeeded in their practice (p < 0.001). Similar patterns were found for Tobacco Cessation (62% versus 14%, p = 0.001), Alcohol Reduction (46% versus 7%, p < 0.001), Stress Management (35% versus 5%, p < 0.001), Exercise (53% versus 10%, p < 0.001), Nutrition (36% versus 8%, p < 0.001), Diabetes Management (48% versus 23%, p < 0.001), Blood Pressure Management (57% versus 43%, p < 0.001) and Lipid Management (59% versus 38%, p < 0.001). We identified a significant gap between physician confidence in their knowledge about risk factors and their effectiveness at providing counseling and obtaining results in their office. Most physicians felt that the routine office follow-up visit was an ineffective method for instituting vascular risk factor reduction. Alternate settings for risk factor reduction may be needed for improving atherosclerosis prevention.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.