HA regimens lasting <14 days induce many beneficial physiological and perceptual adaptations to high ambient temperatures, and improve subsequent exercise performance and capacity in the heat; however, the extent of the adaptations is greatest when HA regimens lasting longer than 14 days are adopted. Large methodological differences in the HA literature mean that there is still uncertainty regarding the magnitude and time course of potential adaptation for a number of physiological and perceptual variables.

The aim of this study was to establish the criterion validity of the SmartJump contact mat in assessing vertical jump height (VJH) and peak power (PP). Twenty-three participants (15 men, age = 26 ± 6 years; 8 women, age = 26 ± 9 years) completed a maximal effort vertical jump using 3 different jump types (countermovement jump [CMJ], countermovement with arms [CMJA], and squat jump [SJ]). Data were simultaneously collected on both the contact mat and force platform. Vertical jump height was calculated using the time in air (TIA) method with both force platform (TIA(platform)) and contact mat (TIA(mat)) data and the takeoff velocity (TOV) method using the force platform (TOV(platform)) data. Peak power was calculated using a validated equation. The results showed that VJH and PP calculated using the TIA(mat) method were significantly greater than that calculated from the TIA(platform) and TOV(platform) methods for all jump types (VJH: p< 0.001, PP: p < 0.001). The results from this study show clear discrepancies between apparatus and calculation methods that may have implications for practitioners and should be considered when assessing VJH and PP in the field.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract