Knowledge of the contribution of the thoracic spine movement, a requisite for UL functional movement, offers the potential for novel directions for research and management in rehabilitation. This systematic reviewed synthesized evidence of thoracic spine mobility during UL movement in athletes. Using three reviewers at each stage, key databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science) were searched up to 30/6/18. Eligibility criteria: adults age 18‐40 (reflecting athletic population) and studies assessing thoracic spine and UL movement. Quality assessment was evaluated using AXIS tool and GRADE for overall quality of evidence. Seven studies were included (n = 168, mean age 26.4 years, 33% males) with n = 20 in an athlete population. Main findings were: Unilateral and bilateral UL flexion resulted in 6.7‐8.0 and 12.0‐12.8° thoracic extension, respectively. Unilateral and bilateral UL abduction resulted in 3.0‐4.0 and 9.0‐15.0 and degrees, respectively. Other thoracic spine movement (lower and upper, rotation and lateral flexion) was variable across movement planes. Overall there was unequivocal evidence of thoracic spine movement, mainly extension during UL movement and notably at the end of elevation across all planes. Findings support further targeted high‐quality research and examination of thoracic mobility, an essential link in the kinetic chain, in practice.
T ransformational times. We're experiencing them like never before. No matter the industry, organizations everywhere are facing unprecedented market and economic pressures, adapting to new generations in the workforce and learning to survive amidst factors like the digital revolution and artificial intelligence.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.