This review summarizes evidence that most of cell protein degradation is maintained by pathways transferring energy from glucose to reduction of enzymic and nonenzymic proteins (redox-responsive). In contrast, a major subcomponent of proteolysis is simultaneously independent of the cell redox network (redox-unresponsive). Thus far, direct and indirect redox-responsive proteolytic effector mechanisms characterized by various investigators include: several classes of proteases, some peptide protease inhibitors, substrate conjugation systems, substrate redox and folding status, cytoskeletal-membrane kinesis, metal homeostasis, and others. The present focus involves redox control of sulfhydryl proteases and proteolytic pathways of mammalian muscle; however, other mechanisms, cell types, and species are also surveyed. The diversity of redox-responsive catabolic mechanisms reveals that the machinery of protein turnover evolved with fundamental dependencies upon the cell redox network, as observed in many species. The net redox status of a reversible proteolytic effector mechanism represents the balance between combined oxidative inactivating influences versus reductive activating influences. Similar to other proteins, redox-responsive proteolytic effectors appear to be oxidized by mixed disulfide formation, nitrosation, reactive oxygen species, and associations or reactions with metal ions and various pro-oxidative metabolites. Systems reducing the proteolytic machinery include major redox enzyme chains, such as thioredoxins or glutaredoxins, and perhaps various reductive metabolites, including glutathione and dihydrolipoic acid. Much of mammalian intracellular protein degradation is reversibly responsive to noninjurious experimental intervention in the reductive energy supply-demand balance. Proteolysis is reversibly inhibited by diamide or dehydroascorbic acid; and such antiproteolytic actions are strongly dependent on the cell glucose supply. However, gross redox-responsive proteolysis is not accompanied by ATP depletion or vice versa. Redox-responsive proteolysis includes Golgi-endoplasmic reticulum degradation, lysosomal degradation, and some amount of extravesicular degradation, all comprising more than half of total cell proteolysis. Speculatively, redox-dependent proteolysis exhibits features expected of a controlling influence coordinating distinct proteolytic processes under some intracellular conditions.
1. At least 95% of the total protein of A31-3T3 cell cultures undergoes turnover. 2. First-order exponential kinetics were used to provide a crude approximation of averaged protein synthesis, Ks, degradation, Kd, and net accumulation, Ka, as cells ceased growth at near-confluent density in unchanged Dulbecco's medium containing 10% serum. The values of the relationship Ka = Ks - Kd were : 5%/h = 6%/h - 1%/h in growing cells, and 0%/h = 3%/h - 3%/h in steady-state resting cells. 3. As determined by comparison of the progress of protein synthesis and net protein accumulation, the time course of increase in protein degradation coincided with the onset of an increase in lysosomal proteinase activity and decrease in thymidine incorporation after approx. 2 days of exponential growth. 4. After acute serum deprivation, rapid increases in protein degradation of less than 1%/h could be superimposed on the prevailing degradation rate in either growing or resting cells. The results indicate that two proteolytic mechanisms can be distinguished on the basis of the kinetics of their alterations. A slow mechanism changes in relation to proliferative status and lysosomal enzyme elevation. A prompt mechanism, previously described by others, changes before changes in cell-cycle distribution or lysosomal proteinase activity. 5. When the serum concentration of growing cultures was decreased to 1% or 0.25%, then cessation of growth was accompanied by a lower steady-state protein turnover rate of 2.0%/h or 1.5%/h respectively. When growth ceased under conditions of overcrowded cultures, or severe nutrient insufficiency, protein turnover did not attain a final steady state, but declined continually into the death of the culture.
Leaf wounding and the wound signaling peptide systemin induce expression of wound response genes while the fungal toxin fusicoccin (FC) induces expression of pathogenesis-related genes. Consistent with their functional differences, FC and systemin regulate the extracellular pH in opposite ways, with systemin inducing an alkalinization and FC an acidification response. Here we show that systemin, wounding and FC activate the same mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs; MPKs) MPK1 and 2 in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) leaves and L. peruvianum suspension-cultured cells. Wounding and FC activated an additional MAPK, MPK3. Pronounced differences were observed with regard to MAPK activation kinetics. FC induced prolonged, and systemin transient activity of the MAPKs. This shows that functionally different elicitors engage the same signaling components, yet induce signal-specific activation dynamics. A comparative analysis of pH effects and MAPK activity in response to specific treatments revealed that the kinetics of pH changes and MAPK activation did not correlate. Simultaneous application of FC and systemin did not lead to immediate pH changes but resulted in rapid increases in MAPK activity. Furthermore, changes in extracellular pH could be induced without concomitant MAPK activation by exchanging conditioned medium with fresh medium. This shows that changes in the extracellular pH are neither required nor sufficient for MAPK activation, suggesting that signaling pathways involving MAPKs and extracellular pH changes operate in parallel and are not part of the same linear pathway.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.