A topical microbicide reduces the probability of virus transmission when applied to the vagina or rectum of a person at risk of sexually acquiring HIV-1 infection. An effective microbicide could significantly reduce the global spread of HIV-1, particularly if women were able to use it covertly to protect themselves. A microbicide could target the incoming virus and either permanently inactivate it or reduce its infectivity, or it could block receptors on susceptible cells near the sites of transmission. We describe here how vaginal administration of the broadly neutralizing human monoclonal antibody b12 can protect macaques from simian-human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV) infection through the vagina. Only 3 of 12 animals receiving 5 mg b12 vaginally in either saline or a gel and then challenged vaginally (up to 2 h later) with SHIV-162P4 became infected. In contrast, infection occurred in 12 of 13 animals given various control agents under similar conditions. Lower amounts of b12 were less effective, suggesting that protection was dose dependent. These observations support the concept that viral entry inhibitors can help prevent the sexual transmission of HIV-1 to humans.

To study HIV-1 escape from a coreceptor antagonist, the R5 primary isolate CC1͞85 was passaged in peripheral blood mononuclear cells with increasing concentrations of the CCR5-specific small molecule inhibitor, AD101. By 19 passages, an escape mutant emerged with a >20,000-fold resistance to AD101. This virus was cross-resistant to a related inhibitor, SCH-C, and partially resistant to RANTES but still sensitive to CCR5-specific mAbs. The resistant phenotype was stable; the mutant virus retained AD101 resistance during nine additional passages of culture in the absence of inhibitor. Replication of the escape mutant in peripheral blood mononuclear cells completely depended on CCR5 expression and did not occur in cells from CCR5-⌬32 homozygous individuals. The escape mutant was unable to use CXCR4 or any other tested coreceptor to enter transfected cells. Acquisition of CXCR4 use is not the dominant in vitro escape pathway for a small molecule CCR5 entry inhibitor. Instead, HIV-1 acquires the ability to use CCR5 despite the inhibitor, first by requiring lower levels of CCR5 for entry and then probably by using the drug-bound form of the receptor.

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1

No abstract

We describe here a cell line-based assay for the evaluation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) neutralization. The assay is based on CEM.NKR cells, transfected to express the HIV-1 coreceptor CCR5 to supplement the endogenous expression of CD4 and the CXCR4 coreceptor. The resulting CEM.NKR-CCR5 cells efficiently replicate primary HIV-1 isolates of both R5 and X4 phenotypes. A comparison of the CEM.NKR-CCR5 cells with mitogen-activated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) in neutralization assays with sera from HIV-1-infected individuals or specific anti-HIV-1 monoclonal antibodies shows that the sensitivity of HIV-1 neutralization is similar in the two cell types. The CEM.NKR-CCR5 cell assay, however, is more convenient to perform and eliminates the donor-to-donor variation in HIV-1 replication efficiency, which is one of the principal drawbacks of the PBMC-based neutralization assay. We suggest that this new assay is suitable for the general measurement of HIV-1 neutralization by antibodies.

The effect on humoral immune responses of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) commenced during primary or chronic human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection was investigated. HAART inhibited the development of anti-gp120 antibodies when initiated during primary infection and could sometimes reduce antibody titers in patients treated within 2 years of HIV-1 infection. Conversely, antibody responses in patients infected for several years were less sensitive to HAART. Administering HAART during primary infection usually did not substantially affect the development of weak neutralizing antibody responses against autologous virus. However, 2 patients treated very early after infection did not develop neutralizing responses. In contrast, 3 of 4 patients intermittently adherent to therapy developed autologous neutralizing antibodies of unusually high titer, largely coincident with brief viremic periods. The induction of strong neutralizing antibody responses during primary HIV-1 infection might require the suppression of virus replication by HAART, to allow for the recovery of immune competency, followed by exposure to native envelope glycoproteins.

AD101 and SCH-C are two chemically related small molecules that inhibit the entry of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) via human CCR5. AD101 also inhibits HIV-1 entry via rhesus macaque CCR5, but SCH-C does not. Among the eight residues that differ between the human and macaque versions of the coreceptor, only one, methionine-198, accounts for the insensitivity of macaque CCR5 to inhibition by SCH-C. Thus, the macaque coreceptor engineered to contain the natural human CCR5 residue (isoleucine) at position 198 is sensitive to HIV-1 entry inhibition by SCH-C, whereas a human CCR5 mutant containing the corresponding macaque residue (methionine) is resistant. Position 198 is in CCR5 transmembrane (TM) helix 5 and is not located within the previously defined binding site for AD101 and SCH-C, which involves residues in TM helices 1, 2, 3, and 7. SCH-C binds to human CCR5 whether residue 198 is isoleucine or methionine, and it also binds to macaque CCR5. However, the binding of a conformation-dependent monoclonal antibody to human CCR5 is inhibited by SCH-C only when residue 198 is isoleucine. These observations, taken together, suggest that the antiviral effects of SCH-C and AD101 involve stabilization, or induction, of a CCR5 conformation that is not compatible with HIV-1 infection. However, SCH-C is unable to exert this effect on CCR5 conformation when residue 198 is methionine. The region of CCR5 near residue 198 has, therefore, an important influence on the conformational state of this receptor.

We have investigated whether the identity of the coreceptor (CCR5, CXCR4, or both) used by primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) isolates to enter CD4+ cells influences the sensitivity of these isolates to neutralization by monoclonal antibodies and CD4-based agents. Coreceptor usage was not an important determinant of neutralization titer for primary isolates in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. We also studied whether dualtropic primary isolates (able to use both CCR5 and CXCR4) were differentially sensitive to neutralization by the same antibodies when entering U87MG-CD4 cells stably expressing either CCR5 or CXCR4. Again, we found that the coreceptor used by a virus did not greatly affect its neutralization sensitivity. Similar results were obtained for CCR5- or CXCR4-expressing HOS cell lines engineered to express green fluorescent protein as a reporter of HIV-1 entry. Neutralizing antibodies are therefore unlikely to be the major selection pressure which drives the phenotypic evolution (change in coreceptor usage) of HIV-1 that can occur in vivo. In addition, the increase in neutralization sensitivity found when primary isolates adapt to growth in transformed cell lines in vitro has little to do with alterations in coreceptor usage.