About 90% of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in the world is grown under rainfed conditions where drought is one of the major constraints limiting its productivity. Unlike the cultivated chickpea, wild Cicer species possesses sources of resistance to multiple stresses; we therefore evaluated perennial wild Cicer species for resistance to drought. C. anatolicum, C. microphyllum, C. montbretii, C. oxydon and C. songaricum were compared with special checks; C. echinospermum, C. pinnatifidum and C. reticulatum and five cultivated chickpeas. After the cultivated chickpeas were killed, accessions were evaluated using a 1-5 scale, where 1 = highly drought resistant (no visible drought effect and full recovery after three successive wiltings) and 5 = highly drought susceptible (leaves and branches dried out, no recovery at all). All accessions of perennial wild Cicer species were significantly superior to those annual wild species and the cultivated chickpeas including the best drought tolerant chickpea, ICC 4958 under drought conditions. Perennial wild Cicer species did not only recover after wilting and drying out above ground level, they also tolerated high temperatures up to 41.8°C. But, they do not cross with the cultivated chickpeas. C. anatolicum should be taken account in long term breeding programs because it has closer affinities to the first crossability group than the others.
Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockers are underutilized in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). We aimed to determine barriers against the use of RAAS blockers in these patients. Patients with stage 3-5 CKD referred to Hacettepe University Hospital Nephrology Unit during a 1 year period were evaluated for RAAS blocker use. Two hundred and seventy-nine patients (166 male, 113 female) were analyzed. The mean age of the patients was 56.7 AE 15.2 years, mean serum creatinine was 2.45 AE 1.44 mg/dL, and mean glomerular filtration rate was 33.3 AE 15.1 mL/min. The mean follow-up time was 22.0 AE 21.9 months and the clinical visit number was 4.0 AE 3.5. Angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers were used by 68.8% of all patients and 67.7% of diabetic patients at the time of analysis. In 82.1% of patients, RAAS blockers had either been used earlier or were being used. Hyperkalemia was the principal reason for both not starting and also discontinuing these drugs in patients with CKD. In 37.4% of patients, reasons for not starting RAAS blockers were unclear. This study showed that hyperkalemia is the major barrier against the use of RAAS blockers in patients with CKD. There was, however, a subset of patients who did not receive RAAS blockers even without clear contraindications.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES:In this study, we hypothesized that dietary salt intake may be related with inflammation and albuminuria independently from blood pressure (BP) in non-diabetic hypertensive patients. SUBJECTS/METHODS: A total of 224 patients with primary hypertension were included in the study. Serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, 24-h urine sodium and albumin excretion were measured in all patients. The subjects were divided into tertiles according to the level of 24-h urinary sodium excretion: low-salt-intake group (n ¼ 76, mean urine sodium: 111.7 ± 29.1 mmol/24 h), mediumsalt-intake group (n ¼ 77, mean urine sodium: 166.1 ± 16.3 mmol/24 h) and high-salt-intake group (n ¼ 71, mean urine sodium: 263.6±68.3 mmol/24 h). RESULTS: Systolic and diastolic BP measurements of patients were similar in the three salt-intake groups. CRP and urinary albumin levels were significantly higher in high-salt-intake group compared with medium-and low-salt-intake groups (P ¼ 0.0003 and P ¼ 0.001, respectively). CRP was positively correlated with 24-h urinary sodium excretion (r ¼ 0.28, P ¼ 0.0008) and albuminuria, whereas albuminuria was positively correlated with 24-h urinary sodium excretion (r ¼ 0.21, P ¼ 0.0002). Multiple regression analysis revealed that urinary sodium excretion was an independent predictor of both CRP and albuminuria. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that high salt intake is associated with enhanced inflammation and target organ damage reflected by increased albuminuria in treated hypertensive patients independent of any BP effect. Keywords: albuminuria; hypertension; inflammation; salt intake INTRODUCTION Salt intake is an important factor in the genesis of primary hypertension. Epidemiological and clinical data have showed that high salt intake is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular diseases and stroke. 1 Recent work has provided further evidence that high dietary salt intake may even partly cause blood pressure (BP) -independent target organ damage including left ventricular hypertrophy and microalbuminuria. [2][3][4] Microalbuminuria is a significant predictor of endothelial dysfunction and an independent marker of cardiovascular diseases in patients with primary hypertension. 5,6 Several studies have demonstrated that high salt intake is positively related to urinary albumin excretion and this relation may be independent of BP. 3,4,7 The mechanisms responsible for this effect are unclear. In animal models, dietary salt overload has been demonstrated to contribute to renal injury documented by albuminuria and decreased glomerular filtration rate with a minimally increased arterial pressure. 8,9 Inflammatory mechanisms have been proposed to have a role in this nephrotoxic effect of salt excess. 9-13 The role of inflammation in the initiation and progression of cardiovascular diseases is increasingly recognized. 14,15 Studies in hypertensive individuals have shown increased plasma and vascular tissue levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) and several inflammatory cytokines, suggesting a...
Background:Chronic kidney disease can lead to sarcopenia; however, no study has described sarcopenia in the patients undergoing renal transplantation.Objectives:The aim of the present study was to assess the prevalence of sarcopenia in renal transplant recipients (RTR) and to evaluate the demographic and metabolic risk factors associated with sarcopenia in these patients.Patients and Methods:Sarcopenia was diagnosed by measuring handgrip strength in 166 RTR (68 females and 98 males; mean age, 37.9 ± 11.9 years). Basal metabolic rate, fat mass, free-fat mass, total body water, body mass index, and calf circumference were determined, along with blood biochemistry, vitamin D levels, and glomerular filtration rate.Results:Among 166 patients, sarcopenia was present in 34 (20.5%). Handgrip, basal metabolic rate, free fat mass, and total body water were significantly lower in patients with sarcopenia in comparison with those without sarcopenia. There were no differences between patients with and without sarcopenia in terms of mean time since transplantation, the presence of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, coronary artery disease, hyperlipidemia, glomerular filtration rate, and body mass index. Univariate analysis revealed significant differences between patients with and without sarcopenia with respect to age (mean of 43.70 ± 13.97 and 36.37 ± 10.82 years, respectively; P = 0.007) and 25-OH vitamin D levels (median (IQR) of 12 (2-39) and 17.70 (3-68) μg/L, respectively; P = 0.024). There was a statistically significant positive correlation between vitamin D levels and handgrip strength (r = 0.334; P < 0.001). Multivariate regression analysis determined that age was an independent predictive variable of sarcopenia in RTR (β = 1.060; 95% CI, 1.017-1.105; and P = 0.006).Conclusions:Chronic renal disease contributes to sarcopenia, which may develop at an earlier age in RTR.
Hemodialysis leads to an increase in cTnI levels. However, the effect of increased cTnI levels on survival rates in hemodialysis patients with underlying coronary artery disease has not yet been determined. Prospective multi-center studies with large sample size are required to clarify this issue.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.