Background Most adults do not engage in sufficient physical activity to maintain good health. Smartphone apps are increasingly used to support physical activity but typically focus on tracking behaviors with no support for the complex process of behavior change. Tracking features do not engage all users, and apps could better reach their targets by engaging users in reflecting their reasons, capabilities, and opportunities to change. Motivational interviewing supports this active engagement in self-reflection and self-regulation by fostering psychological needs proposed by the self-determination theory (ie, autonomy, competence, and relatedness). However, it is unknown whether digitalized motivational interviewing in a smartphone app engages users in this process. Objective This study aimed to describe the theory- and evidence-based development of the Precious app and to examine how digitalized motivational interviewing using a smartphone app engages users in the behavior change process. Specifically, we aimed to determine if use of the Precious app elicits change talk in participants and how they perceive autonomy support in the app. Methods A multidisciplinary team built the Precious app to support engagement in the behavior change process. The Precious app targets reflective processes with motivational interviewing and spontaneous processes with gamified tools, and builds on the principles of self-determination theory and control theory by using 7 relational techniques and 12 behavior change techniques. The feasibility of the app was tested among 12 adults, who were asked to interact with the prototype and think aloud. Semistructured interviews allowed participants to extend their statements. Participants’ interactions with the app were video recorded, transcribed, and analyzed with deductive thematic analysis to identify the theoretical themes related to autonomy support and change talk. Results Participants valued the autonomy supportive features in the Precious app (eg, freedom to pursue personally relevant goals and receive tailored feedback). We identified the following five themes based on the theory-based theme autonomy support: valuing the chance to choose, concern about lack of autonomy, expecting controlling features, autonomous goals, and autonomy supportive feedback. The motivational interviewing features actively engaged participants in reflecting their outcome goals and reasons for activity, producing several types of change talk and very little sustain talk. The types of change talk identified were desire, need, reasons, ability, commitment, and taking steps toward change. Conclusions The Precious app takes a unique approach to engage users in the behavior change process by targeting both reflective and spontaneous processes. It allows motivational interviewing in a mobile form, supports psychological needs with relational techniques, and targets intrinsic motivation with gamified elements. The motivational interviewing approach shows promise, but the impact of its interactive features and tailored feedback needs to be studied over time. The Precious app is undergoing testing in a series of n-of-1 randomized controlled trials.
BACKGROUND Most adults do not engage in sufficient physical activity to maintain good health. Smartphone apps are increasingly used to support physical activity but typically focus on tracking behaviors with no support for the complex process of behavior change. Tracking features do not engage all users, and apps could better reach their targets by engaging users in reflecting their reasons, capabilities, and opportunities to change. Motivational interviewing supports this active engagement in self-reflection and self-regulation by fostering psychological needs proposed by the self-determination theory (ie, autonomy, competence, and relatedness). However, it is unknown whether digitalized motivational interviewing in a smartphone app engages users in this process. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to describe the theory- and evidence-based development of the Precious app and to examine how digitalized motivational interviewing using a smartphone app engages users in the behavior change process. Specifically, we aimed to determine if use of the Precious app elicits change talk in participants and how they perceive autonomy support in the app. METHODS A multidisciplinary team built the Precious app to support engagement in the behavior change process. The Precious app targets reflective processes with motivational interviewing and spontaneous processes with gamified tools, and builds on the principles of self-determination theory and control theory by using 7 relational techniques and 12 behavior change techniques. The feasibility of the app was tested among 12 adults, who were asked to interact with the prototype and think aloud. Semistructured interviews allowed participants to extend their statements. Participants’ interactions with the app were video recorded, transcribed, and analyzed with deductive thematic analysis to identify the theoretical themes related to autonomy support and change talk. RESULTS Participants valued the autonomy supportive features in the Precious app (eg, freedom to pursue personally relevant goals and receive tailored feedback). We identified the following five themes based on the theory-based theme autonomy support: valuing the chance to choose, concern about lack of autonomy, expecting controlling features, autonomous goals, and autonomy supportive feedback. The motivational interviewing features actively engaged participants in reflecting their outcome goals and reasons for activity, producing several types of change talk and very little sustain talk. The types of change talk identified were desire, need, reasons, ability, commitment, and taking steps toward change. CONCLUSIONS The Precious app takes a unique approach to engage users in the behavior change process by targeting both reflective and spontaneous processes. It allows motivational interviewing in a mobile form, supports psychological needs with relational techniques, and targets intrinsic motivation with gamified elements. The motivational interviewing approach shows promise, but the impact of its interactive features and tailored feedback needs to be studied over time. The Precious app is undergoing testing in a series of n-of-1 randomized controlled trials.
BACKGROUND Insufficient physical activity is an increasing public health concern. New technologies may help to change physical activity levels while also enabling the identification of key predictors with high accuracy. The Precious smartphone app was developed to investigate the effect of specific, modular intervention elements on physical activity, and to examine theory-based predictors within individuals. OBJECTIVE This study pilot tested a fully automated factorial N-of-1 RCT with the Precious app and examined if (1) digitalized motivational interviewing (dMI) and (2) heart-rate variability-based biofeedback features increase objectively recorded steps. The secondary aim was to assess whether daily self-efficacy and motivation predict within-person variability in daily steps. METHODS Fifteen adults took part in a 40-day factorial N-of-1 randomized controlled trial. They installed two study apps onto their phones: app 1 to receive intervention elements on individually randomized days and app 2 to collect Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) data on self-efficacy, motivation, perceived barriers, pain and illness. Steps were tracked through Xiaomi Mi Band activity bracelets. The factorial design included seven two-day biofeedback interventions with a Firstbeat bodyguard 2 heart-rate variability sensor, and seven two-day dMI interventions, a washout-day after each intervention, and 11 control days. EMA questions were sent twice per day. The effects of self-efficacy, motivation, and the interventions on subsequent steps were analyzed using within-person dynamic regression models and with aggregated data using longitudinal multilevel modeling (level 1: daily observations, level 2: participants). The analyses adjusted for covariates that also predict daily steps, i.e. within- and between-person perceived barriers, pain or illness, time trends and recurring events. RESULTS All participants finished the study, and adherence to activity bracelet and EMA measurements was high. The implementation of the factorial design was successful, with the dMI features used on average 5.1 times of the 7 available interventions. Biofeedback interventions were used on average 5.7 times out of 7, though three participants used this feature a day later than suggested and one missed all suggested timings. Neither within- nor between-persons analyses revealed and significant intervention effects on step counts. Self-efficacy predicted steps in four individuals. Motivation predicted steps in three individuals. Aggregated data from 14 participants showed group-level effects: daily self-efficacy (B=.462, p<.001), motivation (B=.390, p<.001), and pain or illness (B=-1524, p<.001) were the strongest predictors of daily steps in all participants. CONCLUSIONS The automated factorial N-of-1 trial with the Precious app was mostly feasible and acceptable, especially the automated delivery of the dMI components, while self-conducted biofeedback measurements were more difficult to time correctly. The findings suggest that changes in self-efficacy and motivation may have same-day effects on physical activity, but effects vary between individuals. This study provides recommendations based on the lessons learned on the implementation of factorial N-of-1 RCTs. CLINICALTRIAL The trial was not formally pre-registered, as conventions for registration of factorial n-of-1 experimental studies had not been established prior to this study’s commencement in 2016. However, a dated publicly available version of the study protocol was published just after the start of data collection and prior to any data analyses (Helf et al., 2016, pp. 13–17).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.