To investigate the feasibility of tumor type prediction with MRI radiomic image features of different brain metastases in a multiclass machine learning approach for patients with unknown primary lesion at the time of diagnosis. Materials and methods: This single-center retrospective analysis included radiomic features of 658 brain metastases from T1-weighted contrast material-enhanced, T1-weighted nonenhanced, and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images in 189 patients (101 women, 88 men; mean age, 61 years; age range, 32-85 years). Images were acquired over a 9-year period (from September 2007 through December 2016) with different MRI units, reflecting heterogeneous image data. Included metastases originated from breast cancer (n = 143), small cell lung cancer (n = 151), non-small cell lung cancer (n = 225), gastrointestinal cancer (n = 50), and melanoma (n = 89). A total of 1423 quantitative image features and basic clinical data were evaluated by using random forest machine learning algorithms. Validation was performed with model-external fivefold cross validation. Comparative analysis of 10 randomly drawn cross-validation sets verified the stability of the results. The classifier performance was compared with predictions from a respective conventional reading by two radiologists. Results: Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the five-class problem ranged between 0.64 (for non-small cell lung cancer) and 0.82 (for melanoma); all P values were less than .01. Prediction performance of the classifier was superior to the radiologists' readings. Highest differences were observed for melanoma, with a 17-percentage-point gain in sensitivity compared with the sensitivity of both readers; P values were less than .02. Conclusion: Quantitative features of routine brain MR images used in a machine learning classifier provided high discriminatory accuracy in predicting the tumor type of brain metastases.

Stereotactic radiotherapy with its forms of intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), intracranial fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is today a guideline-recommended treatment for malignant or benign tumors as well as neurological or vascular functional disorders. The working groups for radiosurgery and stereotactic radiotherapy of the German Society for Radiation Oncology (DEGRO) and for physics and technology in stereotactic radiotherapy of the German Society for Medical Physics (DGMP) have established a consensus statement about the definition and minimal quality requirements for stereotactic radiotherapy to achieve best clinical outcome and treatment quality in the implementation into routine clinical practice.

This review details and discusses the technological quality requirements to ensure the desired quality for stereotactic radiotherapy using photon external beam radiotherapy as defined by the DEGRO Working Group Radiosurgery and Stereotactic Radiotherapy and the DGMP Working Group for Physics and Technology in Stereotactic Radiotherapy. The covered aspects of this review are 1) imaging for target volume definition, 2) patient positioning and target volume localization, 3) motion management, 4) collimation of the irradiation and beam directions, 5) dose calculation, 6) treatment unit accuracy, and 7) dedicated quality assurance measures. For each part, an expert review for current state-of-the-art techniques and their particular technological quality requirement to reach the necessary accuracy for stereotactic radiotherapy divided into intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery in one single fraction (SRS), intracranial fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT), and extracranial stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is presented. All recommendations and suggestions for all mentioned aspects of stereotactic radiotherapy are formulated and related uncertainties and potential sources of error discussed. Additionally, further research and development needs in terms of insufficient data and unsolved problems for stereotactic radiotherapy are identified, which will serve as The authors D. Schmitt and O. Blanck contributed equally to the manuscript.