published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers.
Link to publication
General rightsCopyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.• Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal.If the publication is distributed under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the "Taverne" license above, please follow below link for the End User
One
of the well-known observations in the Fischer–Tropsch
(FT) reaction is that the CH4 selectivity for cobalt catalysts
is always higher than the value expected on the basis of the Anderson–Schulz–Flory
(ASF) distribution. Depositing graphitic carbon on a cobalt catalyst
strongly suppresses this non-ASF CH4, while the formation
of higher hydrocarbons is much less affected. Carbon was laid down
on the cobalt catalyst via the Boudouard reaction. We provide evidence
that the amorphous carbon does not influence the FT reaction, as it
can be easily hydrogenated under reaction conditions. Graphitic carbon
is rapidly formed and cannot be removed. This unreactive form of carbon
is located on terrace sites and mainly decreases the CO conversion
by limiting CH4 formation. Despite nearly unchanged higher
hydrocarbon yield, the presence of graphitic carbon enhances the chain-growth
probability and strongly suppresses olefin hydrogenation. We demonstrate
that graphitic carbon will slowly deposit on the cobalt catalysts
during CO hydrogenation, thereby influencing CO conversion and the
FT product distribution in a way similar to that for predeposited
graphitic carbon. We also demonstrate that the buildup of graphitic
carbon by 13CO increases the rate of C–C coupling
during the 12C3H6 hydrogenation reaction,
whose products follow an ASF-type product distribution of the FT reaction.
We explain these results by a two-site model on the basis of insights
into structure sensitivity of the underlying reaction steps in the
FT mechanism: carbon formed on step-edge sites is involved in chain
growth or can migrate to terrace sites, where it is rapidly hydrogenated
to CH4. The primary olefinic FT products are predominantly
hydrogenated on terrace sites. Covering the terraces by graphitic
carbon increases the residence time of CHx intermediates, in line with decreased CH4 selectivity
and increased chain-growth rate.
published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers.
Link to publication
General rightsCopyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.• Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal.If the publication is distributed under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the "Taverne" license above, please follow below link for the End User
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.