We have shown before that subjects exposed to a changed gravitoinertial environment produce exaggerated manual forces. From the observed pattern of findings, we argued that initial forces were exaggerated because of abnormal vestibular activity and peak forces because of degraded proprioceptive feedback. If so, only peak but not initial forces should be affected by water immersion, an environment that influences proprioceptive feedback but not vestibular activity. The present study was undertaken to scrutinize this prediction. Twelve subjects sat in a chair once immersed in water and once on dry land, while producing pre-trained isometric forces with a joystick. In a control experiment, subjects performed a four-choice reaction-time task. During the joystick task, produced initial forces were comparable in water and on land, while peak (+24%) and end forces (+22%) were significantly higher in water, as was their reaction time (+6%). During the control task, reaction time was comparable in water and on land. Our findings corroborate the above notion that initial forces increase when the vestibular system is stimulated (gravitoinertial change, visual field motion, but not water immersion), while peak forces increase when proprioceptive feedback is degraded (probably all three scenarios) and are not corrected until response end. Our findings further confirm the absence of cognitive slowing in simple-choice reaction tasks under shallow-water immersion conditions.

Hemodynamic responses to combined heavy dynamic leg exercise (hiP), breath holding (BH) and gravity-induced blood volume shifts direction were studied. Thirteen subjects were studied at normal gravity and 12 during parabolic flight, performing 20 s hiP or combined hiP&BH (stimulus period) from a baseline of 30 W at normal gravity (1 G(z+)). Heart rate and mean arterial pressure responses to BH were similar between gravity conditions, but stroke volume (SV) differed markedly between gravity conditions: at 1 G(z+) SV was higher [112 +/- 16 ml (mean +/- SD)] during BH, than during eupnea [101 +/- 17 ml (P < 0.05, N = 13)]. In weightlessness the corresponding SV values were 105 +/- 16 and 127 +/- 20 ml, respectively (P < 0.05, N = 6). Transthoracic electrical conductance (TTC) was used as index for intrathoracic volume. TTC fell significantly during BH. This decrease was attenuated in weightlessness. It is concluded that the transient microgravity temporarily reduces the efficiency of the muscle pump so that the deep inspiration at the onset of the high-intensity exercise and breath-hold period cannot augment venous return as it could during identical manoeuvres at normal gravity.