As a first step toward elucidating mechanisms involved in the sorting of synaptic vesicle proteins in neurons, we have used immunofluorescence microscopy to determine the distribution of two synaptic vesicle proteins, synapsin I and synaptophysin, in hippocampal neurons developing in culture. In mature cultures, synapsin I and synaptophysin immunoreactivity was concentrated in puncta that were restricted to sites where axons contacted neuronal cell bodies or dendrites. Electron-microscopic immunocytochemistry demonstrated that these puncta corresponded to vesicle-filled axonal varicosities that were exclusively presynaptic. At early stages of development, before cell-cell contact, both synapsin I and synaptophysin were preferentially localized in axons, where they were particularly concentrated in the distal axon and growth cone. In axons that did not contact other cells, immunostaining for these two proteins had a granular appearance, which persisted for at least 7 d, but focal accumulations of vesicles comparable to those seen at sites of synaptic contact were not observed. When neurons contacted one another, numerous puncta of synapsin I and synaptophysin formed within the first week in culture. Double-label immunofluorescence demonstrated that the two vesicle antigens were closely codistributed throughout these stages of development. These observations demonstrate that synaptic vesicle proteins assume a polarized distribution within nerve cells beginning early in development, as soon as the axon can be identified. In contrast, differences in microtubule polarity orientation that distinguish mature axons and dendrites, and that have been proposed to account for the selective sorting of some materials in nerve cells, first appear at a subsequent stage of development. The selective distribution of synaptic vesicle proteins to the axon occurs in isolated cells, independent of interactions with other cells. In contrast, the formation of large clusters of vesicles typical of presynaptic specializations requires contact with an appropriate postsynaptic target. Thus, in cultured hippocampal neurons, the localization of synaptic vesicles in presynaptic specializations is the result of sorting mechanisms intrinsic to individual neurons as well as to mechanisms mediated by cell-cell contact.

Hippocampal neurons in culture develop extensive axonal and dendritic arbors and form numerous synapses. Presynaptic specializations occur at sites of contact between axons and somata or dendrites but they do not appear until day 3 in culture, even though numerous contacts between cells develop within the first 24 hr (Fletcher et al., 1991). To determine whether this delay in the appearance of presynaptic specializations could be related to maturational events in the presynaptic axon or in the postsynaptic target, “heterochronic” cocultures were prepared by adding newly dissociated neurons to cultures containing mature neurons. The competence of axons to form presynaptic vesicle clusters in response to contact with the somata or dendrites of mature or immature neurons was determined by immunofluorescent staining for synapsin I or synaptophysin. After only 1 d of coculture, there was a fivefold increase in the number of synapses along the somata and dendrites of the mature neurons, compared to mature neurons cultured alone. If newly dissociated neurons were labeled with a fluorescent dye before coculture, dye-labeled axons frequently were colocalized with presynaptic specializations on mature cells. In contrast, when the axons of mature neurons contacted immature neurons, synapses were first observed only after coculture for 3 d. These results suggest that the axons of hippocampal neurons have the capacity to form presynaptic specializations soon after they emerge, provided they encounter appropriate targets, but that the cell bodies and dendrites of hippocampal neurons are not capable of inducing the formation of presynaptic specializations until they reach a critical stage of maturation.

An 11-kb fragment of Brucella abortus genomic DNA cloned into the BamHI site of pUC9 expressed a 60-kDa protein in Escherichia coli DH5-ot. Antibodies reactive with this 60-kDa protein were detected by Western blot (immunoblot) analysis in sera from mice, cattle, and goats experimentally infected with B. abortus, in sera from mice experimentally infected with Brucella melitensis, and in serum from a dog experimentally infected with Brucella canis. Similar results were seen with sera obtained from cattle and dogs with naturally acquired brucellosis. The gene encoding the 60-kfla Brucella protein was localized to a 2-kb EcoRI fragment which was also reactive in Southern blots with genomic DNA from other strains of B. abortus as well as with genomic DNA from B. melitensis and B. canis. Nucleotide sequence analysis of the cloned EcoRl fragment revealed an open reading frame encoding a protein with a predicted molecular mass of 51,847 Da and an isoelectric point of 5.15. Comparison of the deduced amino acid sequence of the immunoreactive Brucella protein with the SWISS-PROT protein sequence data base revealed that it shares >40% amino acid sequence identity with the E. coli and Salmonella typhimurium HtrA stress response proteins. Computer-assisted analysis of this amino acid sequence also predicted that the putative Brucella HtrA homolog contains an export signal sequence and a serine protease active site, two structural features characteristic of previously described HtrA proteins. A potential SFE type heat shock promoter sequence was detected upstream of the cloned Brucella htrA gene, and Northern (RNA) blot analysis demonstrated that exposure of B. abortus 2308 to heat shock conditions resulted in a transient elevation of htrA transcription. These results strongly suggest that the immunoreactive 60-kDa Brucella protein is a member of the HtrA class of stress response proteins.