Background Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane (ILM)-flap technique would seem to lead to higher closure rate and better visual acuity than traditional procedure with ILM peeling for the treatment of large macular hole (LMH). Visual acuity recovery does not reveal many other functional changes related to surgical approach. Our purpose was to evaluate macular function and morphology over a 1-year follow-up after inverted ILM-flap technique for LMH by using microperimetry in order to predict visual prognosis. Methods This study was a prospective unrandomized single-center study. 23 eyes of 22 patients with idiopathic LMH, with a minimum diameter ranging from 400 to 1000 μm, were included. All patients underwent vitrectomy with inverted ILM-flap technique and gas tamponade. We analyzed macular hole closure rate and functional outcomes including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), macular sensitivity (MS) at central 12° and central macular sensitivity (CMS) at central 4°, and fixation behavior as bivariate contour ellipse area (BCEA, degrees2) at 68%, 95%, and 99% of fixation points measured by microperimeter, over a follow-up of 12 months. Results The macular hole closure rate was 98%. The BCVA improved from 20/230 (Logmar, 1.06 ± 0.34) to 20/59 (logMar, 0.47 ± 0.45) at last follow-up (p < 0.001). Retinal sensitivity and BCEA significantly improved (MS, p = 0.001; CMS, p < 0.0001; BCEA: 68%, p < 0.01; 95%, p < 0.01; 99%, p = 0.001). Multiple stepwise regression analysis showed the final BCVA was significantly associated with macular hole size (β = 0.002, p = 0.03), preoperative MS (β = − 0.06, p = 0.001) and BCEA at 95% and 99% of fixation points (β = − 0.12, p = 0.01; β = 0.06, p = 0.01). Conclusions Inverted ILM-flap technique for LMH results in good morphologic and functional outcomes. Macular hole size and microperimetric parameters as preoperative MS and BCEA have a predictive role on post-surgical visual acuity.

Background: Despite the high closure rate of large macular hole (LMH) after surgery, visual recovery is often worse than expected. Microperimetric biofeedback can improve visual function in macular pathologies. We evaluated the efficacy of biofeedback on macular function after successful inverted flap technique for LMH. Methods: In this prospective comparative study, 26 patients after LMH surgical closure were enrolled. The whole sample was equally divided into two groups. In Group 1 (trained), patients underwent a double cycle of microperimetric biofeedback, using structured light stimulus plus acoustic tone; in Group 2 (control), patients underwent scheduled visits. We analyzed visual acuity, retinal sensitivity at central 12° (macular sensitivity, MS) and 4° (central macular sensitivity, CMS), and fixation stability over twelve months. Results: Visual acuity improved mainly in the trained group, without any significant differences between the groups (p > 0.05). Only after training did MS significantly improve (p = 0.01). CMS more significantly improved in the trained (p < 0.001) than the control group (p < 0.01) (Group 1 vs. 2, p = 0.004). Only in the trained group did fixation significantly improve (3 months, p ≤ 0.03; 12 months, p ≤ 0.01). An equality test on matched data confirmed a greater significant improvement of CMS (p ≤ 0.02) at all follow-up and fixation (p ≤ 0.02) at last follow-up after training. Conclusions: Microperimetric biofeedback consolidates and increases the improvement of retinal sensitivity and fixation gained after successful inverted flap technique.

Background/purpose: Full-thickness macular hole is a complication of idiopathic macular telangiectasia type 2 with a low surgical closure rate and a poor functional recovery. We analyze morphologic and functional outcomes after an inverted internal limiting membrane-flap technique for full-thickness macular hole complicating idiopathic macular telangiectasia type 2 using optical coherence tomography and microperimetry. Case report: A 77-year-old man presented us complaining visual impairment in the left eye (20/40) due to a full-thickness macular hole complicating idiopathic macular telangiectasia type 2. The patient underwent vitrectomy with an inverted internal limiting membrane-flap technique and injection of 22% SF6 gas. Optical coherence tomography and functional analysis, including visual acuity test and microperimetry, were performed before surgery and over 3 months. Optical coherence tomography scans revealed macular hole closure at 1-month follow-up. Visual acuity and retinal sensitivity improved from 20/40 to 20/20 and from 13.1 to 14.9 dB, respectively. Fixation stability (bivariate contour ellipse area) improved from 2.02 to 1.58 deg2, from 5.44 to 4.24 deg2 and from 9.72 to 7.58 deg2, at 68%, 95%, and 99% of fixation points, respectively. Conclusion: Inverted internal limiting membrane-flap technique may be an alternative approach in patients with full-thickness macular hole complicating diopathic macular telangiectasia type 2, and microperimetry may be a useful tool to analyze related functional changes.

The authors describe the first case of eye amelanotic cellular blue nevus reported in literature and discuss the main differential diagnosis.