No abstract

BackgroundWide resection with tumor-free margins is necessary in soft-tissue sarcomas to minimize local recurrence and to contribute to long-term survival. Information about treatment outcome and prognostic factors of adult sarcoma requiring chest wall resection (CWR) is limited.MethodsSixty consecutive patients were retrospectively studied for overall survival (OS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Twenty-one prognostic factors regarding survival were analyzed by univariate analysis using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test.ResultsWith a median survival of 2.5 years, the OS was 46% (33%) at 5 (10) years. The LRFS was 64% at 5 and 10 years, and the DFS was 30% and 25% at 5 and 10 years. At the end of the study period, 26 patients (43%) were alive, of which 20 patients (33%) had no evidence of disease and 40 patients (67%) had no chest wall recurrence. In the group of 9 patients with a radiation-induced soft-tissue sarcoma, the median survival was 8 months. Favorable outcome in univariate analysis in OS and LRFS applied for the low-grade sarcoma, bone invasion, and sternal resection. For OS only, age below 60 years and no radiotherapy were significant factors contributing to an improved survival. CWR was considered radical (R0) at the pathological examination in 43 patients. There were 52 patients with an uneventful recovery. There was one postoperative death.ConclusionsCWR for soft-tissue sarcoma is a safe surgical procedure with low morbidity and a mortality rate of less than 1%. With proper patient selection acceptable survival can be reached in a large group of patients. Care must be given to patients with radiation-induced soft-tissue sarcoma who have a significantly worse prognosis.

Several factors leading to wound healing problems exist preoperatively. In a multidisciplinary setting, these factors should be weighed carefully against the possible benefits of an extended chest wall resection. Especially when ulceration of a tumor exists, or when omentum is considered for soft tissue reconstruction, increased risk on wound healing problems occurs. For the majority of patients chest wall resection will remain a safe and suitable procedure.

No abstract

BackgroundFull-thickness chest wall resection (CWR) is the preferred treatment for breast cancer (BC) patients with extensive isolated locoregional recurrence. It remains a challenge to select patients that will benefit most from this treatment. The aim of this study was to define prognostic factors in patients who undergo CWR with curative intent.MethodsBC patients who underwent a CWR with curative intent for recurrence of disease between 1986 and 2006 were included in this retrospective study. Twenty-two factors were studied in a univariate analyses, and multivariate stepwise Cox regression analyses was performed.ResultsSeventy-seven patients were included in this study. The 5-year overall survival was 25%. There was one postoperative death. Univariate analyses showed that three prognostic factors were significantly correlated with OS and disease-free survival: (1) interval between primary treatment and CWR (P = .02 and .004, respectively), (2) chemotherapy for recurrence (P = .05 and .05, respectively), and (3) resection specimen smaller than 150 cm2 (P = .03 and .009, respectively). An interval lasting >10 years between primary treatment and CWR remained statistically significantly correlated with better overall survival and disease-free survival after multivariate analyses.ConclusionsCWR is a safe treatment in patients who have isolated extensive BC recurrence. The best survival outcome was seen in patients after a disease-free interval of ≥10 years. Existing data show that adjuvant radiotherapy and adjuvant hormone therapy for estrogen-positive tumors improves overall survival. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy may be considered in individual patients.

Isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP) with melphalan with or without tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-a) is currently performed in clinical trials in patients with hepatic metastases. Previous studies led to the hypothesis that the use of TNF-a in isolated limb perfusion causes specific destruction of tumour endothelial cells and thereby induces an increased permeability of tumour vasculature. However, whether TNF-a contributes to the therapeutic efficacy in IHP still remains unclear. In an in vivo rat liver metastases model we studied three different tumours: colon carcinoma CC531, ROS-1 osteosarcoma and BN-175 soft-tissue sarcoma which exhibit different degrees of vascularisation. IHP was performed with melphalan with or without the addition of TNF-a. IHP with melphalan alone resulted, in all tumour types, in a decreased growth rate. However in the BN-175 tumour addition of TNF-a resulted in a strong synergistic effect. In the majority of the BN-175 tumour-bearing rats, a complete response was achieved. In vitro cytoxicity studies showed no sensitivity (CC531 and BN-175) or only minor sensitivity (ROS-1) to TNF-a, ruling out a direct interaction of TNF-a with tumour cells. The response rate in BN-175 tumour-bearing rats when TNF-a was coadministrated with melphalan was strongly correlated with drug accumulation in tumour tissue, as only in these rats a five-fold increased melphalan concentration was observed. Secondly, immunohistochemical analysis of microvascular density (MVD) of the tumour showed a significantly higher MVD for BN-175 tumour compared to CC531 and ROS-1. These results indicate a direct relation between vascularity of the tumour and TNF-a mediated effects. Assessment of the tumour vasculature of liver metastases would be a way of establishing an indication for the utility of TNF-a in this setting.

TNF-based ILP can avoid amputations in most patients with recurrent extremity STS in a prior operated and irradiated field.

No abstract