Background VZV infection can involve every level of the neurologic system: from the central nervous system (CNS) to the peripheral nervous system (PNS), including aseptic meningitis. Prognosis seems to differ between these neurological involvements. Prognostic factors remain unknown. Methods This is a retrospective multicenter study including all patients with a positive VZV polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from eight centers in Paris (France) between 2011 and 2018. Unfavorable outcome was defined as mortality linked to VZV or incomplete recovery. Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) evaluated disability before and after the infection, with the difference designated as Rankin Delta. Results Seventy‐two patients were included (53% male, median age 51 years, median mRS 0). Immunosuppression was reported in 42%. The clinical spectrum included 26 cases of meningitis, 27 instances of CNS involvement, 16 of PNS involvement, and 3 isolated replications (positive PCR but no criteria for neurological complications from VZV). Antiviral treatment was administered to 69 patients (96%). Sixty‐two patients completed follow‐up. Death linked to VZV occurred in eight cases. Unfavorable outcome (UO) occurred in 60% and was significantly associated with a higher prior mRS (Odd‐ratio (OR) 3.1 [1.4–8.8] p = .012) and the presence of PNS or CNS manifestations (OR 22 [4–181] p = .001, OR 6.2 [1.3–33] p = .03, respectively, compared to meningitis). In the CSF, higher protein level (p < .0001) was also significantly associated with a higher Rankin Delta. Conclusions Neurological complications of VZV with evidence of CSF viral replication are heterogeneous: aseptic meningitis has a good prognosis, whereas presence of CNS and PNS involvement is associated with a higher risk of mortality and of sequelae, respectively.

The statements and opinions expressed in COVID-19 Curbside Consults are based on experience and the available literature as of the date posted. While we try to regularly update this content, any offered recommendations cannot be substituted for the clinical judgment of clinicians caring for individual patients.

Objective HCQ is an essential medication in SLE, proven to lengthen survival and reduce flares. Its use, however, is limited by its rare but severe ophthalmological complications. Here, we aimed to analyse factors associated with HCQ retinopathy including HCQ blood levels. Methods This case–control study compared SLE patients with and without HCQ retinopathy, defined by abnormal results for at least two of the following ophthalmological tests: automated visual fields, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) and fundus autofluorescence. We compared clinical and laboratory findings to assess risk factors for HCQ retinopathy. Results The study included 23 patients with confirmed retinopathy (cases) and 547 controls. In the univariate analysis, age (P &lt; 0.001), height (P = 0.045), creatinine clearance (P &lt; 0.001), haemoglobin concentration (P = 0.01), duration of HCQ intake, (P &lt; 0.001), higher cumulative HCQ dose (P &lt; 0.001) and geographical origin (West Indies and sub-Saharan Africa) (P = 0.007) were associated with the risk of retinopathy, while HCQ blood levels were not. In the multivariate analysis, only cumulative dose (P = 0.016), duration of intake (P = 0.039), creatinine clearance (P = 0.002) and geographical origin (P &lt; 0.0001, odds ratio 8.7) remained significantly associated with retinopathy. Conclusion SLE patients on HCQ should be closely monitored for retinopathy, especially those from the West Indies or sub-Saharan Africa, or with renal insufficiency, longer HCQ intake or a high cumulative dose. Although reducing the daily dose of HCQ in patients with persistently high HCQ blood levels seems logical, these concentrations were not associated with retinopathy in this study with controls adherent to treatment.

Objectives To provide insight into the safety of Recombinant Zoster Vaccine (RZV) in patients with Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases (IMID). Methods Patients who received RZV in a single center Rheumatology Department were retrospectively included. An IMID flare was defined as a) a documentation of flare in the office notes or patient portal communication or b) new prednisone prescription, in the 12 weeks after each dose. Results Six-hundred twenty-two patients were included (67% female, median age 67 years), 8.5% of them experienced AEs and HZ incidence was 0.6% after median follow-up of 36 weeks. Of 359 IMID patients: 88 had RA (25%), 50 vasculitis (14%), 29 PMR (8%). At vaccination, 35% were on glucocorticoids (GC). Fifty-nine patients (16%) experienced a flare, 18 flares occurred in temporal relation to a treatment change (31%). RA patients had the highest flare rate (n = 21, 24%), 25% of patients who flared required adjustment of immunosuppression. In a multivariate analysis, use of GC at time of vaccination was associated with flare after vaccination (OR 2.31 [1.3-4.1], p = 0.004). A time-to-flare survival analysis (Cox-model) showed that GC was a significant predictor of IMID flare after first RZV dose (HR 2.4 [1.3-4.5], p = 0.0039) and that a flare after the first dose was associated with flaring after the second RZV dose (HR 3.9 [1.7-9], p = 0.0015). Conclusion RZV administration in patients with IMIDs was generally well-tolerated, though mild flares were not uncommon in the first 12 weeks after vaccination. These data may provide useful information for patient education when considering RZV administration.