BackgroundAlthough the median age at diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is 70 years, a subset of patients with NSCLC present at a younger age (<40 years). Little is known about the time-trends in incidence of NSCLC in the young, their characteristics and outcomes.MethodsThe surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database was used to extract NSCLC cases from 1978 to 2010. Yearly incidence rates in various age groups, race, site of disease, histology, treatment patterns, and outcomes were assessed. We modeled Kaplan–Meyer survival curves stratified by age of presentation.ResultsYoung patients represented 0.6% of incident NSCLC from 1978 to 2010. The incidence of young NSCLC declined significantly during this time-period. Young NSCLCs had a higher proportion of women (51%), Asians or Pacific Islanders (14%), adenocarcinoma histology (59%) and were more likely to present with distant metastases (68%). The young had better all cause and lung cancer-specific survival than the older patients (median survival for localized, regional, and distant disease: not reached, 28, 9 vs. 46, 17, 5 months; p < 0.001 for all groups). Male sex, non-adenocarcinoma histology, and main bronchial primary were independent negative prognostic factors among the young. In contrast to the overall population, black race was a poor prognostic factor among the young.ConclusionThe incidence of NSCLC in the young decreased from 1978 to 2010. The clinical characteristics of NSCLC in the young, including demographic distribution, treatment, and outcomes are different from those observed in the older patients.
Although considered a disease of the elderly, a subset of patients with mesothelioma are young (<40 years). The goal of this study was to understand their characteristics and outcomes. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used to extract mesothelioma cases (1990-2010). We modeled Kaplan-Meyer survival curves stratified by site of disease, and age of presentation. 2% (207 of 12345) of mesothelioma patients are young. Sex distribution is comparable among the young (51% males, 49% females); males predominated (78%, 22%) in the older cohort. Frequency of pleural and peritoneal mesothelioma are similar in the young (47%, 48% respectively); pleural disease predominated in the old (90%, 9%). Cancer-directed surgeries are more frequent in the young. Regardless of histologic subtype, young patients with pleural (11 vs. 8 months) and peritoneal (not reached vs. 10 months) mesothelioma had significantly improved overall survival. In multivariate analysis, younger age was an independent prognostic factor. Although rare, mesothelioma do occur in the young; their characteristics are distinct from those of older patients. Further studies are needed to understand the interplay between genetic susceptibility and mineral fiber carcinogenesis in the pathogenesis of mesothelioma in the young.
A key component of personalized medicine is companion diagnostics that measure biomarkers, for example, protein expression, gene amplification or specific mutations. Most of the recent attention concerning molecular cancer diagnostics has been focused on the biomarkers of response to therapy, such as V-Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer, epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in metastatic malignant melanoma. The presence or absence of these markers is directly linked to the response rates of particular targeted therapies with small-molecule kinase inhibitors or antibodies. Therefore, testing for these markers has become a critical step in the target therapy of the aforementioned tumors. The core capability of personalized medicine is the companion diagnostic devices' (CDx) ability to accurately and precisely stratify patients by their likelihood of benefit (or harm) from a particular therapy. There is no reference in the literature discussing the impact of device's measurement performance, for example, analytical accuracy and precision on treatment effects, variances, and sample sizes of clinical trial for the personalized medicine. In this paper, using both analytical and estimation method, we assessed the impact of CDx measurement performance as a function of positive and negative predictive values and imprecision (standard deviation) on treatment effects, variances of clinical outcome, and sample sizes for the clinical trials.
TPS1096 Background: HER2-targeted therapies have improved survival in patients (pts) with HER2+ advanced/metastatic breast cancer (mBC) but challenges remain, including resistance to current HER2-targeted therapies. Also, additional treatment options are needed in pts with brain metastases (BM). In the phase 2 DESTINY-Breast01 trial, T-DXd demonstrated efficacy, with an objective response rate (ORR) of 61.4% and median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 19.4 mo in pts with previously treated HER2+ advanced/mBC (Modi SABCS 2020); data from an earlier cutoff of this trial supported approval of T-DXd in the US, Europe, and Japan. In a subgroup analysis of 24 pts with stable BM, T-DXd showed preliminary efficacy, with mPFS of 18.1 mo (Jerusalem ESMO Breast Cancer 2020). Here, we describe a phase 1b/2 trial evaluating the safety and preliminary antitumor activity of T-DXd monotherapy and combinations in pts with HER2+ advanced/mBC, including pts with stable and active BM. Methods: DESTINY-Breast07 (NCT04538742) is a global, multicenter, open-label, phase 1b/2 trial designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and preliminary antitumor activity of T-DXd monotherapy and combinations in pts with HER2+ advanced/mBC. This study consists of a T-DXd monotherapy module (module 0) and 5 combination modules of T-DXd plus (1) durvalumab, (2) pertuzumab, (3) paclitaxel, (4) durvalumab + paclitaxel, or (5) tucatinib, all in pts with no or stable BM. Two additional modules consisting of (6) T-DXd + tucatinib and (7) T-DXd monotherapy will include pts with untreated BM not requiring local therapy or previously treated BM that have progressed since local therapy (active BM). The need for chronic steroids or local therapy to manage BM symptoms is exclusionary. Modules 2 to 5 will each consist of 2 parts: dose finding (part 1) and dose expansion (part 2). Modules 0, 1, 6, and 7 will include part 2 only. Part 1 of individual modules will enroll pts who have had disease progression while receiving ≥1 prior line of therapy in the metastatic setting. In part 2, pts who have received no prior therapy (modules 0 to 5) or ≤1 prior therapy (modules 6 to 7) for metastatic disease will be randomized to receive a T-DXd combination regimen or monotherapy. The primary endpoints are determination of the recommended phase 2 doses (part 1 only) and safety and tolerability of T-DXd and combinations (parts 1 and 2). Secondary endpoints include ORR, PFS, PFS2, duration of response (DoR), and overall survival (all assessed in part 2 only) and pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity (parts 1 and 2). To assess central nervous system (CNS) activity, exploratory endpoints were added, including CNS-ORR, CNS-DoR, and CNS-PFS (by RECIST version 1.1 and RANO-BM criteria) as well as cognitive and symptom assessment using CANTAB, MDASI-BT, and NANO. Clinical trial information: NCT04538742 .
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.