Recent calculations using coupled cluster on solids have raised the discussion of using a N −1/3 power law to fit the correlation energy when extrapolating to the thermodynamic limit, an approach which differs from the more commonly used N −1 power law, which is, for example, often used by quantum Monte Carlo methods. In this paper, we present one way to reconcile these viewpoints. Coupled cluster doubles calculations were performed on uniform electron gases reaching system sizes of 922 electrons for an extremely wide range of densities (0.1 < r s < 100.0) to study how the correlation energy approaches the thermodynamic limit. The data were corrected for the basis set incompleteness error and use a selected twist angle approach to mitigate the finite size error from shell filling effects. Analyzing these data, we initially find that a power law of N −1/3 appears to fit the data better than a N −1 power law in the large system size limit. However, we provide an analysis of the transition structure factor showing that N −1 still applies to large system sizes and that the apparent N −1/3 power law occurs only at low N.

We explore an alternative to twist averaging in order to obtain more cost-effective and accurate extrapolations to the thermodynamic limit (TDL) for coupled cluster doubles (CCD) calculations. We seek a single twist angle to perform calculations at, instead of integrating over many random points or a grid. We introduce the concept of connectivity, a quantity derived from the non-zero four-index integrals in an MP2 calculation. This allows us to find a special twist angle that provides appropriate connectivity in the energy equation, and which yields results comparable to full twist averaging. This special twist angle effectively makes the finite electron number CCD calculation represent the TDL more accurately, reducing the cost of twist-averaged CCD over N s twist angles from N s CCD calculations to N s MP2 calculations plus one CCD calculation.

Computationally efficient and accurate quantum mechanical approximations to solve the many-electron Schrödinger equation are crucial for computational materials science. Methods such as coupled cluster theory show potential for widespread adoption if computational cost bottlenecks can be removed. For example, extremely dense k-point grids are required to model long-range electronic correlation effects, particularly for metals. Although these grids can be made more effective by averaging calculations over an offset (or twist angle), the resultant cost in time for coupled cluster theory is prohibitive. We show here that a single special twist angle can be found using the transition structure factor, which provides the same benefit as twist averaging with one or two orders of magnitude reduction in computational time. We demonstrate that this not only works for metal systems but also is applicable to a broader range of materials, including insulators and semiconductors.

We recently developed a scheme to use low-cost calculations to find a single twist angle where the coupled cluster doubles energy of a single calculation matches the twist-averaged coupled cluster doubles energy in a finite unit cell. We used initiator full configuration interaction quantum Monte Carlo as an example of an exact method beyond coupled cluster doubles theory to show that this selected twist angle approach had comparable accuracy in methods beyond coupled cluster. Furthermore, at least for small system sizes, we show that the same twist angle can also be found by comparing the energy directly (at the level of second-order Moller–Plesset theory), suggesting a route toward twist angle selection, which requires minimal modification to existing codes that can perform twist averaging.

We introduce a straightforward Gaussian process regression (GPR) model for the transition structure factor of metal periodic coupled cluster singles and doubles (CCSD) calculations. This is inspired by the method introduced by Liao and Gr\"uneis for interpolating over the transition structure factor to obtain a finite size correction for CCSD [J. Chem. Phys. 145, 141102 (2016)], and by our own prior work using the transition structure factor to efficiently converge CCSD for metals to the thermodynamic limit [Nat. Comput. Sci. 1, 801 (2021)]. In our CCSD-FS-GPR method to correct for finite size errors, we fit the structure factor to a 1D function in the momentum transfer, $G$.We then integrate over this function by projecting it onto a k-point mesh to obtain comparisons with extrapolated results. Results are shown for lithium, sodium, and the uniform electron gas.