BackgroundUp to 30% of patients with food allergies have clinical reactivity to more than one food allergen. Although there is currently no cure, oral immunotherapy (OIT) is under investigation. Pilot data have shown that omalizumab may hasten the ability to tolerate over 4 g of food allergen protein.ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and dose tolerability of a Phase 1 Single Site OIT protocol using omalizumab to allow for a faster and safe desensitization to multiple foods simultaneously.MethodsParticipants with multiple food allergies received OIT for up to 5 allergens simultaneously with omalizumab (rush mOIT). Omalizumab was administered for 8 weeks prior to and 8 weeks following the initiation of a rush mOIT schedule. Home reactions were recorded with diaries.ResultsTwenty-five (25) participants were enrolled in the protocol (median age 7 years). For each included food, participants had failed an initial double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge at a protein dose of 100 mg or less. After pre-treatment with omalizumab, 19 participants tolerated all 6 steps of the initial escalation day (up to 1250 mg of combined food proteins), requiring minimal or no rescue therapy. The remaining 6 were started on their highest tolerated dose as their initial daily home doses. Participants reported 401 reactions per 7,530 home doses (5.3%) with a median of 3.2 reactions per 100 doses. Ninety-four percent (94%) of reactions were mild. There was one severe reaction. Participants reached their maintenance dose of 4,000 mg protein per allergen at a median of 18 weeks.ConclusionThese phase 1 data demonstrate that rush OIT to multiple foods with 16 weeks of treatment with omalizumab could allow for a fast desensitization in subjects with multiple food allergies. Phase 2 randomized controlled trials are needed to better define safety and efficacy parameters of multi OIT experimental treatments with and without omalizumab.

Background Peanut oral immunotherapy (OIT) is a promising approach to peanut allergy but reactions are frequent and some patients cannot be desensitized. The anti-IgE medication omalizumab (Xolair) may allow more rapid peanut updosing and decrease reactions. Objective To evaluate if omalizumab facilitated rapid peanut desensitization in highly allergic patients. Methods Thirty-seven subjects were randomized to omalizumab (n=29) or placebo (n=8). After 12 weeks of treatment subjects underwent a rapid one-day desensitization of up to 250 mg of peanut protein, followed by weekly increases up to 2000 mg. Omalizumab was then discontinued and subjects continued on 2000 mg of peanut protein. They underwent an open challenge to 4000 mg peanut protein twelve weeks after stopping study drug. If tolerated, subjects continued on 4000 mg of peanut protein daily. Results The median peanut dose tolerated on the initial desensitization day was 250 mg for omalizumab versus 22.5 mg for placebo treated subject. Subsequently 23 of 29 (79%) subjects randomized to omalizumab tolerated 2000 mg peanut protein 6 weeks after stopping omalizumab versus 1 of 8 (12%) receiving placebo (p<0.01). Twenty-three subjects on omalizumab versus 1 on placebo passed the 4000 mg food challenge. Overall reaction rates were not significantly lower in omalizumab versus placebo treated subjects (OR=0.57 p=0.15), although omalizumab treated subjects were exposed to much higher doses of peanut. Conclusion Omalizumab allows subjects with peanut allergy to be rapidly desensitized over as little as 8 weeks of peanut OIT. In the majority of subjects, this desensitization is sustained after omalizumab is discontinued. Additional studies will help clarify which patients would benefit most from this approach.

BackgroundThirty percent of children with food allergy are allergic to more than one food. Previous studies on oral immunotherapy (OIT) for food allergy have focused on the administration of a single allergen at the time. This study aimed at evaluating the safety of a modified OIT protocol using multiple foods at one time.MethodsParticipants underwent double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges (DBPCFC) up to a cumulative dose of 182 mg of food protein to peanut followed by other nuts, sesame, dairy or egg. Those meeting inclusion criteria for peanut only were started on single-allergen OIT while those with additional allergies had up to 5 foods included in their OIT mix. Reactions during dose escalations and home dosing were recorded in a symptom diary.ResultsForty participants met inclusion criteria on peanut DBPCFC. Of these, 15 were mono-allergic to peanut and 25 had additional food allergies. Rates of reaction per dose did not differ significantly between the two groups (median of 3.3% and 3.7% in multi and single OIT group, respectively; p = .31). In both groups, most reactions were mild but two severe reactions requiring epinephrine occurred in each group. Dose escalations progressed similarly in both groups although, per protocol design, those on multiple food took longer to reach equivalent doses per food (median +4 mo.; p < .0001).ConclusionsPreliminary data show oral immunotherapy using multiple food allergens simultaneously to be feasible and relatively safe when performed in a hospital setting with trained personnel. Additional, larger, randomized studies are required to continue to test safety and efficacy of multi-OIT.Trial registrationClinicaltrial.gov NCT01490177

BackgroundFood allergy (FA) negatively affects quality of life in caregivers of food-allergic children, imposing a psychosocial and economic burden. Oral immunotherapy (OIT) is a promising investigational therapy for FA. However, OIT can be a source of anxiety as it carries risk for allergic reactions. The effect of OIT with multiple food allergens (mOIT) on FA-specific health-related quality of life (HRQL) has never been studied in participants with multiple, severe food allergies. This study is the first to investigate the effects of mOIT on FA-related HRQL in caregivers of pediatric subjects.MethodsCaregiver HRQL was assessed using a validated Food Allergy Quality of Life – Parental Burden (FAQL-PB) Questionnaire (J Allergy Clin Immunol 114(5):1159-1163, 2004). Parents of participants in two single-center Phase I clinical trials receiving mOIT (n = 29) or rush mOIT with anti-IgE (omalizumab) pre-treatment (n = 11) completed the FAQL-PB prior to study intervention and at 2 follow-up time-points (6 months and 18 months). Parents of subjects not receiving OIT (control group, n = 10) completed the FAQL-PB for the same time-points.ResultsHRQL improved with clinical (change < -0.5) and statistical (p < 0.05) significance in the mOIT group (baseline mean 3.9, 95% CI 3.4-4.4; 6-month follow-up mean 2.5, 95% CI 2.0-3.0; 18-month follow-up mean 1.8, 95% CI 1.4-2.1) and rush mOIT group (baseline mean 3.9, 95% CI 3.1-4.7; 6-month follow-up mean 1.7, 95% CI 0.9-2.6; 18-month follow-up mean 1.3, 95% CI 0.3-2.4). HRQL scores did not significantly change in the control group (n = 10).ConclusionMulti-allergen OIT with or without omalizumab leads to improvement in caregiver HRQL, suggesting that mOIT can help relieve the psychosocial and economic burden FA imposes on caregivers of food-allergic children.

RATIONALE:We and others have previously demonstrated that SLIT can effectively desensitize peanut allergic children, albeit its molecular mechanism(s) is not elucidated. We hypothesized that SLIT acts, in part, by regulating transcription factors and interleukins that are critical to lymphocyte functions and allergic responses. METHODS: Peanut-allergic subjects (1.5-10 years old) were SLITtreated, with a brief escalating dose phase, and then maintained with a dose of 2 mg daily for 3 or 5 years. Subjects then were challenged with peanut, and clinically defined as non-sustained unresponsiveness (non-SU) or sustained unresponsiveness (SU). PBMC from the SLIT-treated subjects were contemporaneously obtained, cultured with the individual's own plasma; and their cryopreserved mRNA was RT-PCR analyzed. RESULTS: The abundance of mRNA for Foxp3, Blimp1, and T-bet in PBMC cultures derived from SU subjects (N55), who underwent 3 years of SLIT-treatment, was increased by ;500% (p<0.05), ;320% (p<0.05), and ;80% (p<0.05), respectively, as compared to their non-SU counterparts (N54). In PBMC from SU subjects (N54) treated for 5 years, ZNF90 mRNA abundance became moderately increased, being ;150% (p<0.05) of that in non-SU cultures (N59). However, the expression of GATA3 and Bcl-6 did not change. In contrast, IL-5 and IL-13 mRNA abundance was reduced in PBMC of SU subjects treated for 3 years, and further reduced and became statistically significant 5 years after SLIT-treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Peanut SLIT treatment up-regulates the expression of the transcription factors Foxp3, Blimp1, T-bet, and ZNF90, while downregulating IL-5 and IL-13, suggesting that these genes play an important role in SLIT-induced peanut sustained unresponsiveness.