A convenience sample of 110 registered nurses in four western states completed a demographic questionnaire and a 20-item medication calculation test to investigate errors in medication calculation that contribute to medication error rates. Intravenous questions were most difficult, then oral, then intramuscular/subcutaneous items. Nurses erred more when more than one calculation was required and when milligram to grain conversion was needed. Nurses who rated their skill and comfort with medication calculation above average scored higher. Yet 81 percent of the nurses were unable to correctly calculate medications 90 percent of the time and 43.6 percent of the test scores were below 70 percent accuracy. Strategies are suggested which may be used in staff development in identify registered nurse medication calculation abilities and to enhance these skills in practicing nurses.
This article describes the use of action research as an information base for policy formulation by a collaborative partnership in Spokane, Washington. Health and social service providers recognized access to care by uninsured persons as a major community issue. Little was known from the consumers' perspective about factors limiting access. No benchmarks existed against which to measure progress. Investigators collected mailed surveys from 475 residents of six Spokane neighborhoods and 97 persons participated in 12 focus group sessions. Income, education, and ethnicity were primary factors affecting perceptions of degree to which medical, dental, and mental health needs were being met. Many residents were unable to obtain needed health care; low-cost dental and mental health services were named as their highest priorities. Quality of care, relationships with providers, immediacy of access, and cost were important concerns. Major barriers were cost, length of time before one could get an appointment, lack of comfort with providers, and having to miss work for appointments. Consumer input is critical in understanding local issues in health care. Action research that combines qualitative and quantitative data enhanced practice/policy decisions through assuring ownership of the research and immediate use of findings by involved agencies.
Lack of access to health care is a concern in many communities. A group of representatives from health, social service, other community agencies and nursing education meet regularly to address issues in providing care to homeless, low-income, and uninsured persons in Spokane, Washington. This group's efforts has been hampered by lack of clearly identified factors that adversely affect access to care. One aspect of community analysis performed by this group used a collaborative community practice model. Community diagnoses were determined from information collected from service providers. Community health nursing faculty, as clinical specialists, can play a role in such a collaborative process.
Theoretical and experiential learning in community assessment are essential components of the preparation of first-level community health nurses. This article describes a collaborative community practice project in which faculty incorporated senior baccalaureate community health nursing students as participants. Students assessed availability and utilization patterns of health care services in Spokane, Washington. Data derived from the survey were used by community planners in addressing issues of access to health care by low-income persons. Learning outcomes of this experiential process are described within the context of Burnard's Experiential Learning Model and community health nursing course objectives. Recommendations for design of similar experiential learning opportunities are made.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.