Echocardiographic determination of multicomponent blood flow dynamics in the left ventricle remains a challenge.In this paper, we compare contrast enhanced, high frame rate (HFR) (1000 frames/s) echo-particle image velocimetry (ePIV) against optical particle image velocimetry (oPIV, gold standard), in a realistic left ventricular (LV) phantom. We find that ePIV compares well to oPIV, even for the high velocity inflow jet (normalized RMSE = 9% ± 1%). In addition, we perform the method of proper orthogonal decomposition, to better qualify and quantify the differences between the two modalities. We show that ePIV and oPIV resolve very similar flow structures, especially for the lowest order mode with a cosine similarity index of 86%. The coarser resolution of ePIV does result in increased variance and blurring of smaller flow structures when compared to oPIV. However, both modalities are in good agreement with each other for the modes that constitute the bulk of the kinetic energy. We conclude that HFR ePIV can accurately estimate the high velocity diastolic inflow jet and the high energy flow structures in an LV setting. Index Terms-Echo-particle image velocimetry (ePIV), echocardiography, high frame rate (HFR) imaging, left ventricular (LV) flow, ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs), ultrasound imaging velocimetry (UIV).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.