Clinical research is necessary for an effective response to an emerging infectious disease outbreak. However, research efforts are often hastily organised and done using various research tools, with the result that pooling data across studies is challenging. In response to the needs of the rapidly evolving COVID-19 outbreak, the Clinical Characterisation and Management Working Group of the WHO Research and Development Blueprint programme, the International Forum for Acute Care Trialists, and the International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infections Consortium have developed a minimum set of common outcome measures for studies of COVID-19. This set includes three elements: a measure of viral burden (quantitative PCR or cycle threshold), a measure of patient survival (mortality at hospital discharge or at 60 days), and a measure of patient progression through the health-care system by use of the WHO Clinical Progression Scale, which reflects patient trajectory and resource use over the course of clinical illness. We urge investigators to include these key data elements in ongoing and future studies to expedite the pooling of data during this immediate threat, and to hone a tool for future needs.

No abstract

Due to numerous mutations in the spike protein, the SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern Omicron (B.1.1.529) raises serious concerns since it may significantly limit the antibody-mediated neutralization and increase the risk of reinfections. While a rapid increase in the number of cases is being reported worldwide, until now there has been uncertainty about the efficacy of vaccinations and monoclonal antibodies. Our in vitro findings using authentic SARS-CoV-2 variants indicate that in contrast to the currently circulating Delta variant, the neutralization efficacy of vaccine-elicited sera against Omicron was severely reduced highlighting T-cell mediated immunity as essential barrier to prevent severe COVID-19. Since SARS-CoV-2 Omicron was resistant to casirivimab and imdevimab genotyping of SARS-CoV-2 may be needed before initiating mAb treatment. Variant-specific vaccines and mAb agents may be required to treat Omicron and other emerging variants of concern.

Background Available data on the characteristics of patients with Ebola virus disease (EVD) and clinical management of EVD in settings outside West Africa, as well as the complications observed in those patients, are limited. Methods We reviewed available clinical, laboratory, and virologic data from all patients with laboratory-confirmed Ebola virus infection who received care in U.S. and European hospitals from August 2014 through December 2015. Results A total of 27 patients (median age, 36 years [range, 25 to 75]) with EVD received care; 19 patients (70%) were male, 9 of 26 patients (35%) had coexisting conditions, and 22 (81%) were health care personnel. Of the 27 patients, 24 (89%) were medically evacuated from West Africa or were exposed to and infected with Ebola virus in West Africa and had onset of illness and laboratory confirmation of Ebola virus infection in Europe or the United States, and 3 (11%) acquired EVD in the United States or Europe. At the onset of illness, the most common signs and symptoms were fatigue (20 patients [80%]) and fever or feverishness (17 patients [68%]). During the clinical course, the predominant findings included diarrhea, hypoalbuminemia, hyponatremia, hypokalemia, hypocalcemia, and hypomagnesemia; 14 patients (52%) had hypoxemia, and 9 (33%) had oliguria, of whom 5 had anuria. Aminotransferase levels peaked at a median of 9 days after the onset of illness. Nearly all the patients received intravenous fluids and electrolyte supplementation; 9 (33%) received noninvasive or invasive mechanical ventilation; 5 (19%) received continuous renal-replacement therapy; 22 (81%) received empirical antibiotics; and 23 (85%) received investigational therapies (19 [70%] received at least two experimental interventions). Ebola viral RNA levels in blood peaked at a median of 7 days after the onset of illness, and the median time from the onset of symptoms to clearance of viremia was 17.5 days. A total of 5 patients died, including 3 who had respiratory and renal failure, for a mortality of 18.5%. Conclusions Among the patients with EVD who were cared for in the United States or Europe, close monitoring and aggressive supportive care that included intravenous f luid hydration, correction of electrolyte abnormalities, nutritional support, and critical care management for respiratory and renal failure were needed; 81.5% of these patients who received this care survived.

In order to understand the kinetics, timing and persistence of SARS-CoV2 neutralizing antibodies (Nabs) we used a surrogate viral neutralization test to evaluate their levels in patients with varying severity of illness, in those with prolonged shedding and those with mild/asymptomatic illness at various time points. Patients with severe or moderate COVID-19 illness had earlier appearance of Nabs at higher levels compared to those with mild or asymptomatic illness. Furthermore, those who had prolonged shedding of the virus, had Nabs appearing faster and at higher levels than those who cleared the virus earlier. Although all individuals appeared to be antibody positive by end of week 5, the positivity rates declined thereafter, especially in those who had mild or asymptomatic illness.

SummaryBackground In the current epidemic of Ebola virus disease in western Africa, many aid workers have become infected. Some of these aid workers have been transferred to specialised hospitals in Europe and the USA for intensifi ed treatment, providing the potential for unique insight into the clinical course of Ebola virus disease under optimised supportive measures in isolation units.

Author Contributions: M.S. made a substantial contribution to the conception and design of the work and to the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data for the work; wrote the manuscript; critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content; and gave final approval of the current version to be published. F.v.L. made a substantial contribution to the conception and design of the work and to the interpretation of data for the work, performed statistical analysis, wrote the manuscript, critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content, and gave final approval of the current version to be published. P.R. made a substantial contribution to the conception and design of the work and to the interpretation of data for the work, critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content, and gave final approval of the current version to be published. C.L. made a substantial contribution to the conception and design of the work and to the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data for the work; wrote the manuscript; critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content; and gave final approval of the current version to be published. All other authors made a contribution to the acquisition of the data for the work, critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content, and gave final approval of the current version to be published. All authors agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

We discovered that values for 2 out of 79 antibodies have unfortunately been wrongly reported. For antibody FnC1t1p2_A5, the IC 100 is 50 mg/mL instead of 16 mg/mL; for antibody CnC2t1p1_B10, the IC 100 is >100 mg/mL instead of 12.5 mg/mL. For the latter antibody, binding characteristics were also corrected. As a consequence, the total number of neutralizing antibodies reported is 27 instead of 28. Changes affect Figures 3, 4, S3, S4, and S5, Tables S3 and S4, and text on pages 1, 3, 5, and 7. Importantly, the corrections have no impact on the conclusions in this paper. We apologize for any inconvenience that may have been caused by this error.