The accurate segmentation and tracking of cells in microscopy image sequences is an important task in biomedical research, e.g., for studying the development of tissues, organs or entire organisms. However, the segmentation of touching cells in images with a low signal-to-noise-ratio is still a challenging problem. In this paper, we present a method for the segmentation of touching cells in microscopy images. By using a novel representation of cell borders, inspired by distance maps, our method is capable to utilize not only touching cells but also close cells in the training process. Furthermore, this representation is notably robust to annotation errors and shows promising results for the segmentation of microscopy images containing in the training data underrepresented or not included cell types. For the prediction of the proposed neighbor distances, an adapted U-Net convolutional neural network (CNN) with two decoder paths is used. In addition, we adapt a graph-based cell tracking algorithm to evaluate our proposed method on the task of cell tracking. The adapted tracking algorithm includes a movement estimation in the cost function to re-link tracks with missing segmentation masks over a short sequence of frames. Our combined tracking by detection method has proven its potential in the IEEE ISBI 2020 Cell Tracking Challenge (http://celltrackingchallenge.net/) where we achieved as team KIT-Sch-GE multiple top three rankings including two top performances using a single segmentation model for the diverse data sets.

When approaching thyroid gland tumor classification, the differentiation between samples with and without “papillary thyroid carcinoma-like” nuclei is a daunting task with high inter-observer variability among pathologists. Thus, there is increasing interest in the use of machine learning approaches to provide pathologists real-time decision support. In this paper, we optimize and quantitatively compare two automated machine learning methods for thyroid gland tumor classification on two datasets to assist pathologists in decision-making regarding these methods and their parameters. The first method is a feature-based classification originating from common image processing and consists of cell nucleus segmentation, feature extraction, and subsequent thyroid gland tumor classification utilizing different classifiers. The second method is a deep learning-based classification which directly classifies the input images with a convolutional neural network without the need for cell nucleus segmentation. On the Tharun and Thompson dataset, the feature-based classification achieves an accuracy of 89.7% (Cohen’s Kappa 0.79), compared to the deep learning-based classification of 89.1% (Cohen’s Kappa 0.78). On the Nikiforov dataset, the feature-based classification achieves an accuracy of 83.5% (Cohen’s Kappa 0.46) compared to the deep learning-based classification 77.4% (Cohen’s Kappa 0.35). Thus, both automated thyroid tumor classification methods can reach the classification level of an expert pathologist. To our knowledge, this is the first study comparing feature-based and deep learning-based classification regarding their ability to classify samples with and without papillary thyroid carcinoma-like nuclei on two large-scale datasets.

Cranial neural crest (NC) contributes to the developing vertebrate eye. By multidimensional, quantitative imaging, we traced the origin of the ocular NC cells to two distinct NC populations that differ in the maintenance of sox10 expression, Wnt signalling, origin, route, mode and destination of migration. The first NC population migrates to the proximal and the second NC cell group populates the distal (anterior) part of the eye. By analysing zebrafish pax6a/b compound mutants presenting anterior segment dysgenesis, we demonstrate that Pax6a/b guide the two NC populations to distinct proximodistal locations. We further provide evidence that the lens whose formation is pax6a/b-dependent and lens-derived TGFβ signals contribute to the building of the anterior segment. Taken together, our results reveal multiple roles of Pax6a/b in the control of NC cells during development of the anterior segment.

The Cell Tracking Challenge is an ongoing benchmarking initiative that has become a reference in cell segmentation and tracking algorithm development. Here, we present a significant number of improvements introduced in the challenge since our 2017 report. These include the creation of a new segmentation-only benchmark, the enrichment of the dataset repository with new datasets that increase its diversity and complexity, and the creation of a silver standard reference corpus based on the most competitive results, which will be of particular interest for data-hungry deep learning-based strategies. Furthermore, we present the up-to-date cell segmentation and tracking leaderboards, an in-depth analysis of the relationship between the performance of the state-of-the-art methods and the properties of the datasets and annotations, and two novel, insightful studies about the generalizability and the reusability of top-performing methods. These studies provide critical practical conclusions for both developers and users of traditional and machine learning-based cell segmentation and tracking algorithms.

Automatic cell segmentation and tracking enables to gain quantitative insights into the processes driving cell migration. To investigate new data with minimal manual effort, cell tracking algorithms should be easy to apply and reduce manual curation time by providing automatic correction of segmentation errors. Current cell tracking algorithms, however, are either easy to apply to new data sets but lack automatic segmentation error correction, or have a vast set of parameters that needs either manual tuning or annotated data for parameter tuning. In this work, we propose a tracking algorithm with only few manually tunable parameters and automatic segmentation error correction. Moreover, no training data is needed. We compare the performance of our approach to three well-performing tracking algorithms from the Cell Tracking Challenge on data sets with simulated, degraded segmentation—including false negatives, over- and under-segmentation errors. Our tracking algorithm can correct false negatives, over- and under-segmentation errors as well as a mixture of the aforementioned segmentation errors. On data sets with under-segmentation errors or a mixture of segmentation errors our approach performs best. Moreover, without requiring additional manual tuning, our approach ranks several times in the top 3 on the 6th edition of the Cell Tracking Challenge.

The virtually error-free segmentation and tracking of densely packed cells and cell nuclei is still a challenging task. Especially in low-resolution and low signal-to-noise-ratio microscopy images erroneously merged and missing cells are common segmentation errors making the subsequent cell tracking even more difficult. In 2020, we successfully participated as team KIT-Sch-GE (1) in the 5th edition of the ISBI Cell Tracking Challenge. With our deep learning-based distance map regression segmentation and our graph-based cell tracking, we achieved multiple top 3 rankings on the diverse data sets. In this manuscript, we show how our approach can be further improved by using another optimizer and by fine-tuning training data augmentation parameters, learning rate schedules, and the training data representation. The fine-tuned segmentation in combination with an improved tracking enabled to further improve our performance in the 6th edition of the Cell Tracking Challenge 2021 as team KIT-Sch-GE (2).

Motivation An automated counting of beads is required for many high-throughput experiments such as studying mimicked bacterial invasion processes. However, state-of-the-art algorithms under- or overestimate the number of beads in low-resolution images. In addition, expert knowledge is needed to adjust parameters. Results In combination with our image labeling tool, BeadNet enables biologists to easily annotate and process their data reducing the expertise required in many existing image analysis pipelines. BeadNet outperforms state-of-the-art-algorithms in terms of missing, added and total amount of beads. Availability BeadNet (software, code, and data set) is available at https://bitbucket.org/t_scherr/beadnet. The image labeling tool is available at https://bitbucket.org/abartschat/imagelabelingtool. Supplementary information Supplementary information is available at Bioinformatics online.

Supervised deep learning approaches for automated diagnosis support require datasets annotated by experts. Intra-annotator variability of a single annotator and inter-annotator variability between annotators can affect the quality of the diagnosis support. As medical experts will always differ in annotation details, quantitative studies concerning the annotation quality are of particular interest. A consistent and noise-free annotation of large-scale datasets by, for example, dermatologists or pathologists is a current challenge. In this paper, we categorize annotation noise in image segmentation tasks, present methods to simulate annotation noise, and examine the impact on the segmentation quality. Two novel automated methods to identify intra-annotator and inter-annotator inconsistencies based on uncertainty-aware deep neural networks are proposed. We demonstrate the benefits of our inspection methods such as focused reinspection of noisy annotations or the detection of generally different annotation styles using the biomedical ISIC 2017 Melanoma image segmentation dataset.