Summary: Ethylene–propylene (EP) copolymerisations were performed with two sterically different metallocenes activated by methylaluminoxane (MAO) in an attempt to better understand the effect of catalyst structure on termination reactions and polymer microstructure. The metallocene precursors under investigation were rac‐dimethylsilylbis(2‐methyl‐4‐phenyl‐1‐indenyl)zirconium dichloride (1) and a more sterically hindered counterpart rac‐dimethylsilylbis(2‐isopropyl‐4‐[3,5‐dimethylphenyl]indenyl) zirconium dichloride (2). For both catalyst systems, the most common termination mechanism was chain transfer to aluminium. In addition, for polymer samples polymerised with 1/MAO, chain growth was terminated by chain transfer to Zr metal in propylene‐rich polymerisations and by chain transfer to ethylene monomer in ethylene‐rich polymerisations. The steric hindrance of 2 was able to suppress the chain transfer to the ethylene monomer, and chain transfer to Zr metal was also found in the ethylene‐rich polymerisations. The greater steric hindrance of 2 also affected the EP copolymer microstructure: regioregularity in the propylene‐rich copolymers was greater and isotacticity less with 2/MAO than with 1/MAO.

No abstract

No abstract

The activity of metallocene/methylaluminumoxane (MAO) catalysts in olefin polymerization is highly dependent on both the alkylation and activation of the complexes. The leaving ligands have an important role in the complex activation, influencing the activity of the system. The aim of this work was to study the reactions of complexes Me2Si(2‐Me‐4,5‐BenzInd)2ZrCl2 (A; BenzInd = benzindenyl) and Me2Si(2‐Me‐4,5‐BenzInd)2Zr(Cl)(NEt2) (B) with trimethylaluminum (TMA) and MAO. The reaction kinetics and products were studied by both ultraviolet–visible and NMR spectroscopy. In addition, the polymerization behavior of the different species was investigated in propene polymerizations. Complex B was more easily monomethylated by TMA than complex A and resulted in L2Zr(Me)(NR2)‐type species. Monomethylation of the complexes before polymerization enhanced the polymerization activity of both complexes. When complexes A and B reacted with MAO, similar cationic species were formed, giving equal polymerization activities. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 43: 6455–6464, 2005