BACKGROUND. Although BRCA1 and BRCA2 were identified in 1994 and1995,
Background:RAD001 is an oral inhibitor of mTOR, an intracellular protein kinase downstream of the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. There is evidence to suggest that Akt promotes breast cancer resistance to cytotoxic treatment and thus targeting this pathway with RAD001 may increase the efficacy of standard chemotherapy. We combined RAD001 in a Phase I dose escalation study with Capecitabine (oral fluorpyrimidine), as treatment of metastatic breast cancer. This study evaluated the oral combination for tolerability and safety. Pharmacokinetics of RAD001 was examined in all dosing cohorts.Methods:This was a single center, Phase I trial. Eligible patients had stage IV breast cancer, have not received endocrine or chemotherapy for 3 weeks prior to initiation and not receiving concurrent endocrine therapy. Patients must not have received prior therapy with capecitabine or an mTOR inhibitor and up to 3 prior chemotherapy regimens were allowable. Pharmacokinetic data are collected weekly for first 2 cycles.All patients received capecitabine (825 mg PO BID) and RAD001 in 3 dose-escalation cohorts: 2.5 mg every other day (Cohort 1), 2.5 mg daily (Cohort 2) and 5 mg daily (cohort 3). The primary endpoint is to determine the DLT of RAD001 + capecitabine, secondary endpoints include tumor response. Treatment continues until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Efficacy assessed every 6 weeks for first 4 cycles, then every 9 weeks until end of the 1st year of treatment, then every 12 weeks after.Results: As of April 2009, 12 patients with a median age of 58 years (range 34-75) have been treated at 3 dose levels: 3 in the 1st cohort, 6 in the 2nd cohort and 3 in the 3rd cohort. Toxicities in cohort 1 were generally manageable and expected. They most commonly consisted of nausea, hand-foot syndrome and elevated LFTs. 2 patients in cohort 2 had a grade 3/4 neutropenia and responded to dose reduction. 1 patient had a grade 3/4 elevated lipid panel. Other adverse events (all grade 1/2) included leukopenia, neutropenia, anemia, hypoalbuminemia, elevated LFTs, nausea, hand-foot syndrome, fatigue, sensory neuropathy, and thrombocytopenia. Of the 9 evaluable patients, the clinical benefit rate (CR+PR+SD ≥ 24 weeks) in this heavily pretreated group is 44%. No patient had DLT during cycle 1. 3 patients remain on treatment. Enrollment to the 3rd cohort continues.Conclusion:The all-oral regimen of RAD001 with capecitabine is well tolerated. The maximal tolerated dose (MTD) after 3 dose escalations was not reached. The maximal dose of 5 mg per day of RAD001 was well tolerated. Final toxicity data and preliminary efficacy will be presented at the meeting. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 6112.
After the first report of the ATAC (Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination) trial, adjuvant aromatase inhibitor use increased rapidly among National Comprehensive Cancer Network member institutions. Increased aromatase inhibitor use was associated with older age, vascular disease, overexpression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), or more advanced stage, and substantial variation was seen among institutions. This article examines adjuvant endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women after the first report of the trial, identifies temporal relationships in aromatase inhibitor use, and examines characteristics associated with choice of endocrine therapy among 4044 postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive nonmetastatic breast cancer presenting from July 1997 to December 2004. Multivariable logistic regression analysis examined temporal associations and characteristics associated with aromatase inhibitor use. Time-trend analysis showed increased aromatase inhibitor and decreased tamoxifen use after release of ATAC results (P < .0001). In multivariable regression analysis, institution (P <. 0001), vascular disease (P <. 0001), age (P = .0002), stage (P = .0002), and HER2 status (P = .0009) independently predicted aromatase inhibitor use. Institutional rates of use ranged from 15% to 66%. Adjuvant aromatase inhibitor use increased after the first report of ATAC, with this increase associated with older age, vascular disease, overexpression of HER2, or more advanced stage. Substantial variation was seen among institutions.
The benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, and trastuzumab therapy are well-established in patients with early breast cancer. Further, there are patient and tumor characteristics that can assist in predicting which patients are more likely to benefit from specific adjuvant therapies. For example, patients whose tumors express estrogen and/or progesterone receptors (ER/PR) derive significant benefit from adjuvant endocrine therapy, whereas those whose tumors do not express these receptors derive very little or no benefit from endocrine therapy [1]. Patients whose tumors overexpress HER2 experience profound benefits from treatment with adjuvant trastuzumab [2,3]. We have recently begun to understand that ER/PR-positive breast cancer also responds differently to chemotherapy than its hormone receptor-negative counterpart. This is not, however, entirely new information. As early as 1978, it was retrospectively observed that ER-positive metastatic breast cancer had lower response rates to a variety of older chemotherapy regimens than did ER-negative disease [4].
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.