Background Food insecurity during pregnancy has important implications for maternal and newborn health. There is increasing commitment to screening for social needs within health care settings. However, little is known about current screening processes or the capacity for prenatal care clinics to address food insecurity among their patients. We aimed to assess barriers and facilitators prenatal care clinics face in addressing food insecurity among pregnant people and to identify opportunities to improve food security among this population. Methods We conducted a qualitative study among prenatal care clinics in New Hampshire and Vermont. Staff and clinicians engaged in food security screening and intervention processes at clinics affiliated with the Northern New England Perinatal Quality Improvement Network (NNEPQIN) were recruited to participate in key informant interviews. Thematic analysis was used to identify prominent themes in the interview data. Results Nine staff members or clinicians were enrolled and participated in key informant interviews. Key barriers to food security screening and interventions included lack of protocols and dedicated staff at the clinic as well as community factors such as availability of food distribution services and transportation. Facilitators of screening and intervention included a supportive culture at the clinic, trusting relationships between patients and clinicians, and availability of clinic-based and community resources. Conclusion Prenatal care settings present an important opportunity to identify and address food insecurity among pregnant people, yet most practices lack specific protocols for screening. Our findings indicate that more systematic processes for screening and referrals, dedicated staff, and onsite food programs that address transportation and other access barriers could improve the capacity of prenatal care clinics to improve food security during pregnancy.
Introduction and Objective: Food insecurity (FI) is associated with adverse health outcomes across the lifespan. Primary care and prenatal practices can identify and address FI among patients through screening and interventions. It is unclear how practices and communities responded to FI during the COVID-19 pandemic, and how the pandemic may have impacted practices’ FI strategies. We aimed to understand how practices providing primary care or prenatal care in northern New England experienced changes in FI during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: We conducted a web-based survey of clinicians and staff from 43 unique practices providing primary care or prenatal care in northern New England. Results: Most practices (59.5%) reported at least 1 new food program in the practice or community since the pandemic began. Practices reporting new practice- or community-based food programs were more likely to be rural, federally qualified health centers, and have greater confidence in practice and community capacity to address FI (chi-square tests, P < .05). Conclusion: Results suggest that practices and surrounding communities in northern New England responded to FI during the pandemic by increasing food support programs. Future work is needed to examine the impact of food programs initiated during the pandemic and determine optimal strategies for practices to address FI among patients.
Context: Primary care practices are well-suited to address food insecurity (FI) in patients by conducting routine screening, hosting practice-based food programs, and connecting patients to community resources. Rural practices face unique barriers addressing FI, which may have been impacted by changes in clinic processes, resources, and food needs due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Objective: We sought to understand the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on FI screening and interventions in rural primary care practices. Study Design and Analysis: We conducted thematic analysis of semi-structured qualitative interviews with practice staff using data from a larger mixed-methods study on FI in rural primary care during the pandemic. Setting: Rural areas of New Hampshire, Vermont, and Maine, USA. Population Studied: Clinicians and staff from rural (Rural-Urban Commuting Area Code >= 4) primary care practices in northern New England were recruited through three networks: a practice-based research network, a clinical and translational research network, and a practice-based network for federally qualified health centers. Instrument: A semi-structured interview guide created by the study team included questions regarding: 1) impact of the pandemic on FI screening and interventions; 2) changes to community resources and clinic-community partnerships; and 3) impact of the pandemic on patient food needs. Outcome Measures: Themes and exemplar quotes related to the impact of the pandemic on identifying and addressing FI in rural primary care were identified. Results: Thirteen staff and clinicians from unique rural primary care practices participated in interviews. Themes were organized around categories of Screening/Intervention Processes, Community Factors, Patient Factors, External Factors, and Practice Factors. Key themes included: 1) changes in screening and interventions due to telemedicine; 2) new and stronger connections between practices and community programs; 3) decreased patient stigma around accessing food resources; 4) new practice-based food programs facilitated by state and federal funding; and 5) greater practice prioritization of FI. Conclusions: Barriers to FI screening and interventions during the pandemic included geographic distance and loss of existing food programs. Facilitators included new community connections, decrease in stigma, and increased funding. Identifying and addressing FI was a priority for rural primary care practices during the pandemic.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.